Peanut Gallery Vancouver City Council
| | Est. 12,026 HE | |

Urgent Review Beach Parking Fees

Motion 9 · Park Board Meeting, May 4, 2026

Out of Order Location Jericho Beach, Locarno Beach, Spanish Banks Moved by Angela Kate Haer Watch recording

Summary

  • Proposed an urgent review of beach parking fees at Jericho, Locarno, and Spanish Banks on grounds of affordability and accessibility.
  • Ruled out of order on the basis that the commissioner moving it voted against the November 24, 2025 fees-and-charges decision; under the procedure bylaw, only a commissioner who voted on the prevailing side may move reconsideration.

Vote

Transcript

34 segments

to see you. Our next motion is titled urgent review of beach parking fees affordability and accessibility at Jericho, Locarno and Spanish banks. That motion was moved by Commissioner Hare. Commissioner Hare would you like to read your motion to the table?

Point of order. Yes, what is your, no, we have a point of order. Yes, Commissioner Christensen, what is your point of order?

My point of order is that this motion is out of order based on section 10. This is, we previously voted on this during the fees and charges.

We're listening, Commissioner here, you'll have to listen to the point of order.

Based on section 10 of our procedure bylaws, This motion is out of order because we've already voted on this during the fees and charges.

Thank you. This motion is likely out of order because the commissioner who's raising it voted against the substance of this motion on October 20th and the parking motion. But I'm going to ask the commissioner to read not the whereas clauses but the resolution clauses. Is the motion out of order or not? It may be out of order.

Can you rule if it's out of order or not, please?

Thank you. I run the meeting, and I'm going to listen to the motion, and then I'm going to rule on it.

I think you have to rule on it.

No, I chair this meeting, not you, Commissioner, so your microphone is off. Thank you. And Commissioner Hare can now read her motion.

Commissioner Hare is now allowed to read. Commissioner Hare had a point. Commissioner Hare had another point of order. Yes, what was it, Commissioner Hare?

Chair? I would like a chance to actually introduce my motion before there's a point of order.

Sorry, Chair, you just need to rule on that point of order or rule that it is not a point of order before we proceed. Thank you.

I am not accepting the point of order from Commissioner Christensen because I want to hear the motion before I rule on it.

Commissioner Hare has a point of order.

Thank you, Commissioner Digby and Chair Digby, for letting me introduce my motion, which I think is really important to the Vancouverites that live here and pay taxes and have to have...

Okay, keep it to the point. Your point of order is that you would like to...

I would like to actually introduce my motion...

Okay, thank you. We've heard that. Is there another point of order? Do you have a different subject, Commissioner Christensen? Please go ahead.

I'd like to challenge the ruling of the chair on my previous point of order.

Commissioner Jensen has ruled as a second challenge of the chair. So I would like to speak. No, you can't speak quite yet. There's a challenge to the chair, which means that we need a two-thirds majority to rule in favour of the chair. That means four out of six votes in favour in order that Commissioner Hare should be able to read her motion. All those in favour...

So are you saying that you guys are actually challenging a motion that I'm bringing forward and not able to actually introduce it?

You're not listening, Commissioner Herr. The ruling of the chair was that we would hear you read your motion. That's being challenged. And now we need four votes to support the chair in allowing you to hear this. So everyone who wants to hear the motion and support read out and to support...

No, the challenge to the chair can be brought at any time and it just needs to be moved and seconded.

So this vote right now, just to be clear, if I vote yes, that means I could read out and actually bring forth my motion?

No, it'll be ruled out of order. I'm giving you the chance, though, to read your motion and Commissioner Christensen doesn't want you to read your motion.

So if I want to make sure I'm able to read my motion, do I vote yes or no?

You vote yes.

And then is this normal procedure or is this something out of order that she's doing? Because I would like to do a point of order. This is normal procedure. I would like to do a point of order. No, that's not a point of order.

So I suggest you hold your socks because this is in your favor if you vote in favor of this. So all those in favor of sustaining the chair, please raise your hands. I see Commissioner Digby, Commissioner Verdi, Commissioner Hare. All those opposed to sustaining the chair, please raise your hands. I see Commissioner Basiwanski, Commissioner Jensen, and Commissioner Christensen. So the chair is not sustained on this. And unfortunately, Commissioner Hare, we won't be reading your motion because the substance of your motion, and this is my ruling that your motion is in fact out of order, is that you voted against a very similar, in fact, the identical motion on October the 20th. I remember time and time again. No, no, without talking, you're not allowed to talk back to me. I remember time and time again voting against parking raises and parking. If you speak against me, you're going to get turned off.

At Jericho and Spanish Banks. Clerk, I'm going to have to ask you. And I find that very interesting that you guys are doing this.

Clerk, I'm going to have to ask you to turn off the commissioner's mic.

You guys are doing something that's very uncomfortable.

Commissioner Verdi, what is your point of order?

There was no chance given to anybody to speak, so how is someone raising a point of order when the motion hasn't even been introduced yet?

There is a procedural ruling that Commissioner Christensen has enforced, which is that she should not be allowed to read her motion tonight.

So then you could just essentially block us from bringing any motion forward.

So I'm sorry, if commissioners don't understand what the rules are of this meeting, they can go back and study what they are. The ruling, as I was elaborating on, is that because you voted against the parking motion on October the 20th, and you also voted against the Spanish Bank-specific parking motion on June the... On June the 16th, it was where we approved the parking fees at Spanish Bank. So you voted against both of those. So under Section 10 of the bylaws, you're not allowed to move to reconsider the motion.

Correct. Correct.

Because that's what the rules are, Commissioner Hare. Okay, so we are moving on now.

commissioner I encourage you commissioner oh yeah don't commissioner I would encourage you and caution you at this table if you don't want to be thrown out of the meeting to mark okay okay all right we're gonna recess this meeting and commissioner here is going to cool down we're going to come back in five minutes and if the commissioner is cooled down we'll resume the meeting Thank you, the motion's recessed.