Updating Apartment Regulations
Motion 24 · Council Meeting, July 28, 2026
Summary
- Council approved updates to the Zoning and Development By-law to modernize and simplify apartment design regulations across Vancouver, aimed at improving housing livability while speeding up development approvals.
- A standardized unit mix requirement is introduced city-wide: at least 35% of units in new apartment buildings must have two or more bedrooms, with a minimum of 5% having three or more bedrooms, replacing a patchwork of different rules in various district schedules.
- Floor area exclusion maximums for residential amenities (such as balconies and common rooms) are removed, giving developers more flexibility in designing shared and private spaces without penalizing floor area calculations.
- A new minimum residential storage requirement of 2.3 sq. m (25 sq. ft.) per unit is introduced, replacing a more complex existing system, alongside a simplified floor area exclusion of up to 6% of residential floor area for storage space.
- The changes apply retroactively to 33 recently approved CD-1 rezonings in principle and 4 enacted CD-1 by-laws, ensuring in-stream projects can benefit from the updated rules without restarting approvals.
- These amendments are part of a broader City initiative to reduce construction timelines, support development viability amid high construction costs, and better serve the growing proportion of Vancouverites living in multi-family housing.
Report Images
Vote
Public comments
Read all 5 statements
Transcript
18 segments
Okay, good afternoon, Mayor and Council. I'm Edna Cho, Senior Planner in Housing Policy in PDS. I'll be presenting the work on updating apartment regulations.
I'll go over some background, the proposed changes, engagement findings, and our plan for implementation.
Policy direction for this work is from the Permit Improvement Program. Council approved simplified horizontal angle of daylight regulations last spring and directed staff to report back on options for allowing inboard rooms and ways to simplify storage and balcony requirements. As well, the December 2025 Development Viability Report directed staff to simplify apartment regulations and improve processing. This work focuses on apartments as it is the dominant form of new housing. Currently, apartments accommodate over 190,000 households, two-thirds of those households in the city, including singles, roommates, couples, families, and seniors. However, many current regulations are outdated, inconsistent, and complicated to implement. Our goal is to make it easier to build new housing and improve processing efficiency by setting minimum requirements that support the needs of a diverse range of households, while ensuring the requirements do not compromise the financial viability of new projects. So the changes proposed in this report... Specifically target apartments and townhouses with eight or more units. The key zoning changes are to remove FSR limits on balconies and shared amenities, standardized unit mixes, allow more flexible layout options like inboard rooms, and finally to simplify rules around residential storage while setting a clear baseline requirement. To make these changes, this report proposes to amend section 10 and 11 of the zoning and development bylaw, as well as a number of consequential changes to district schedules and policies. These zoning updates will work hand in hand with the new citywide design guide, which is the next item on the meeting agenda, ensuring our regulations and guidelines are aligned. So I'm going to go over the four changes, starting with the amenities and balconies. Our current regulations cap FSR exclusions at 10% for amenities and 8% to 16% for balconies, creating inconsistencies across zones. We heard from engagement that residents like and utilize these spaces and from industry that these rigid caps have actually forced poor design outcomes on some projects. To fix this, our proposed change removes these maximum limits entirely. This standardizes the review process and removes the restriction that makes it easier to build larger, potentially more desirable balconies and amenities.
The next change is standardizing our unit mix requirements. Our current regulations are highly inconsistent, varying across multiple policies, guidelines, community plans, and district schedules. While Strata and Broadway plan rental rezonings mandate a 35% two or more bedroom mix with 10% three bedrooms, other rental rezonings drop the three bedroom requirement entirely, and district schedules vary greatly, many with no mix requirements at all. Engagement highlighted a critical need for larger apartments, but severe affordability barriers persist in actually being able to afford those larger units. The average rent for a newer three-bedroom apartment has reached $4,000 per month, which requires an income of over $160,000 a year to afford, while pre-sale prices average $1.76 million, making three-bedroom units exceptionally difficult to afford.
So staff considered both short and long term implications of three bedroom requirements. In the short term, three bedroom units have become too expensive for most households to afford. In addition, industry feedback confirms that these larger layouts are harder to lease and less profitable than smaller studios or one bedroom units. And this is made worse by current market conditions where there is a need to support project viability so new developments and those within the existing pipeline can actually move forward and complete. However, looking at the long term, these units remain expensive precisely because they are so scarce. So while our three-bedroom rental stock has successfully doubled over the past decade, we are still catching up on decades of not building enough of them. So we must continue to increase this critical supply over time so we do not make the affordability crisis in these larger units even worse. So with that in mind, our proposed change introduces a simplified standardized unit mix across the city for all rezonings and development permits and will apply to all 10 years. So new projects must include 35% two-plus bedrooms with a minimum of five three-bedroom units. This update replaces messy rules with one simple and consistent one, making the application process more efficient and understandable. It also expands the requirement to some zoning districts in the city that aren't covered and have no mixed requirements at all. The 5% three-bedroom requirement strikes a careful balance. It allows us to continue growing our long-term supply of family apartments while directly addressing the reality that these units are exceptionally expensive for households to afford and highly challenging for builders to deliver. In addition, we will continue to have exceptions for seniors housing, supportive housing, housing in the downtown east side, and for constrained sites.
Next topic is inboard rooms. Under current regulations, all habitable spaces except washrooms, kitchens, and storage must have an exterior window. In 2025, Council approved changes to the horizontal angle of daylight to reduce regulatory complexity and directed staff to report back on the feasibility of allowing inboard rooms. Engagement revealed opposing viewpoints on the topic. Some people indicated they wouldn't want in-board rooms and were opposed to them, while others highlighted that these spaces are already being built and can actually improve livability, optimize layouts, and better utilize deep development sites.
So our proposed change allows more types of flexible inboard rooms for varied uses. However, we will continue to require a window for any bedrooms counted toward our unit mix requirement. So that means our two and three bedroom units will still require a window in each of the bedrooms.
The next topic is storage. Under current regulations, we incentivize storage with an FSR exclusion of up to 40 square feet per unit while securing a 25 square foot minimum through permit conditions. During engagement, we heard that dedicated storage remains highly desirable and important to residents. However, feedback also highlighted that the current rules are a great source of frustration for applicants because they're far too prescriptive, often leading to poor design outcomes that get used for other purposes after occupancy anyway. So our proposed change simplifies this by setting a flat requirement of at least 25 square foot of storage per unit located in or out of suite, counted directly in FSR. To offset this, we are introducing a standardized 6% FSR exclusion that can be flexible and used for any residential purpose. So the ultimate goal is to ensure residents actually get their storage while the industry maintains an exclusion they already rely on. As well, the change gives architects the creative flexibility to design better and more functional layouts.
As mentioned already, these regulatory changes will be paired directly with the updated guidance in the new CDDG, which is the next item on the council agenda. I've already covered the overall feedback by topic in the previous slides, but the next few slides will provide a brief summary of who we engaged with and how. So in fall 2024, we surveyed roughly 500 local apartment dwellers to understand their top priorities. Following that, in January 2025, we conducted technical interviews with industry stakeholders to see how our current regulations play out on the ground. Most recently, in March 2026, we hosted a dedicated session with about 30 developers, architects, and industry reps to gather direct feedback on these proposed regulations. Overall, our engagement highlighted some clear priorities and challenges. Apartment residents emphasized that unit size, layout, and outdoor spaces are critical, while those currently living with in-board rooms reported high satisfaction. Meanwhile, developers and architects emphasized that building under current market conditions is exceptionally challenging. They noted that our overly prescriptive regulations often conflict with consumer demand and hinder design flexibility, particularly regarding storage. So let's move on into implementation. So if approved by council, the new regulations will take effect upon bylaw enactment on October 27th, allowing for the intake of new and revised development permits. Additionally, active rezoning applications that have yet to be approved by council will be subject to the new rules at that time. To minimize disruption and respond to industry interest, recommendation B of the report retroactively applies the proposed updates to 37 active CD1 rezoning projects. This approach allows flexibility, enabling recently approved projects that have not yet reached the construction phase to either proceed uninterrupted under previous rules or voluntarily incorporate the new regulations. So looking ahead, staff will seek future opportunities to bring forward similar amendments to other existing CD1s. So in conclusion, this proposal accelerates housing delivery by introducing modernized apartment design requirements that meet the needs of a diverse population without compromising the financial viability of new construction projects. Thank you. That concludes the presentation. We have staff available to answer any follow-up questions you may have.
Thank you very much. Councillor Orr, you held this item, so you have up to five minutes to ask questions of team members.
I did, yes. And a lot of my questions were answered by that excellent presentation. I think mostly I was very confused by the inboard rooms. And so what you're saying is if it's a one-bedroom apartment, an inboard room doesn't count to that one bedroom.
That's correct. That's right. And it can't be counted as a two-bedroom.
So we're not talking about not having windows for one-bedroom apartments. This is just an extra flex room or something. Okay. That's very interesting. And for studios, you know, we're talking about, like, studio doesn't mean a one-bedroom. So studio, is there relaxations around that?
So it would just mean that you could enclose the sleeping area so your bed's not out in the open. So you could do that now. And it wouldn't be counted towards our bedroom requirement because we're only counting two and three bedrooms with proper windows.
Right, so studios currently don't have that one-bedroom designation. And so what you're saying, a studio could be two bedrooms because you could add an inboard? No.
No, like so a studio would stay a studio. It's just that now they could enclose like the sleeping area, which is commonly what people want to do. So your bed isn't out in the open with your living space.
Yeah, I live in one of those situations. And I was wondering, okay, so like you can't enclose it because then that would be a one bedroom.
You can't enclose it now. But now you would be allowed to under these new rules.
Councillor Domonato.
Yeah, just one clarifying question, and thanks, Ed, and I thought it was an excellent presentation as well. Just around, we've had a few experiences in the past where we've introduced changes, and unless we're kind of monitoring, you know, within a few years, sometimes we'll find that maybe what we intended isn't actually what's translating on the ground. I'm thinking about when we were dealing with... secondary suites and some changes we made over a decade ago. What's your thinking or staff's thinking on being able to sort of see this translated into action in terms of actually being implemented? Is there a way to kind of monitor or look at this in a couple of years and go, okay, what are we seeing in terms of actual final product? And I'm just curious about that. That's all.
Yeah, that's a great question. And it is something that we as staff are also really concerned about. So in the report, we've indicated that we're going to be monitoring the impacts and the outcomes of these changes every six months. As well, through our regular annual progress report, we are always reporting out on the family mix. So we're going to be including the in-board rooms in there as well to report out on. So we're going to be tracking that as part of these changes and reporting out and monitoring every six months to see what's happening.
Okay, that's great. Thank you for that. I don't see anyone else in the queue. I'm happy to move the recommendations.
Okay, great. Mayor? Is there a seconder? Councillor Klassen, sorry. Councillor Klassen, sorry, your hand first. Council, is there any discussion?
Since I'm still in the queue, I'll briefly say I really appreciate the thoughtful steps being recommended by staff, particularly because a number of these points are addressing issues that have been, at least I heard about this term, last term. And so I feel it's very responsive and offers some more flexibility. And so I'm happy to support them.
Thank you very much. Seeing no one else in the queue, I'm going to call the vote. If we can please go to the voting panel. Great. And that passes unanimously. Thank you.
Statement Watch
Yeah. Thanks very much. It's quite an honor for this to be marked. It's quite important for us to mark Emancipation Day as a community. I think it's wonderful that the City of Vancouver and the Mayor of Vancouver are marking Emancipation Day. I don't think we do enough in Canada to actually mark Emancipation Day. Juneteenth is very important for Americans, and we seem to latch on to some of that. But there's obviously a lot of work to be done. The history of the relationship between the city of Vancouver and the Black communities has been, at best, a complicated one. And we hope that there will be improvements. There's a reason why the United Nations decided to have another decade to mark black presence, black dignity, addressing anti-racism against black people. And some of this is reflected in the work that is done and hasn't been done in the city of Vancouver. So this is an important day. It's an important celebration. And we hope that the work does go with the words. Thank you.
Statement Watch
I'd like to say a few words. Good day. My name is Neville Thomas.
I would like to say thanks for having us here. The group has reduced considerably, but I'm happy to be here.
Also, the presence of Dr. Andrew Wright, nice meeting you. I would like to start by saying thanks to group for your contribution, participation over all these years. This occasion is a historic one.
And at the end of all year, 26, 27, I would like you to be assured that we, the members of the anti-racism group, greatly appreciate the contribution you have made, as well as the greater population. Thank you, and we look forward to continued relationships and your contribution as we move forward.
Statement Watch
First of all, I'd like to thank all the councillors in the city of Vancouver for recognizing the contributions of my father. He's quite humble, and he didn't even know about this. We just surprised him. He just found out right now. Yeah, so Connor's been very working with us on that end. But thank you very much, and I want to thank all the family members that are here today. You all mean a lot to my dad and us, and it's a great day for him. Thank you. I just told him he was coming for lunch at City Hall. And it would be a quick 15 minutes. And yeah, I don't know if he was playing along or if he actually knew, but I don't think he knew. Are you surprised? I think it is a great surprise for me. I would like to thank for recognizing me as the founder of the Punjabi market. So I'm very thankful for the city hall and all the city Councillors for recognizing my services for the senior society and as well as for the Punjabi market. Thank you.
Statement Watch
First of all, I'd like to thank all the councillors in the city of Vancouver for recognizing the contributions of my father. He's quite humble, and he didn't even know about this. We just surprised him. He just found out right now. Yeah, so Connor's been very working with us on that end. But thank you very much, and I want to thank all the family members that are here today. You all mean a lot to my dad and us, and it's a great day for him. Thank you. I just told him he was coming for lunch at City Hall. And it would be a quick 15 minutes. And yeah, I don't know if he was playing along or if he actually knew, but I don't think he knew. Are you surprised? I think it is a great surprise for me. I would like to thank for recognizing me as the founder of the Punjabi market. So I'm very thankful for the city hall and all the city Councillors for recognizing my services for the senior society and as well as for the Punjabi market. Thank you.
Statement Watch
Well done. Thank you.
Do we get, like, the group photo?
Yeah, for sure.
We've got one more. We've got somebody else who'd like to speak. Gentlemen, it's my pleasure to know Mr. Sutakale for a long time. And I found him such a nice person, so amicable, so friendly. And I have learned a lot from him. I have read some of his books. They were very inspiring. They reflect what the community is here. So it gives me inspiration as well as good guidance. And with his inspiration, I have also written two books. One is Life and Act of Art. and today I have another poetry in daily life. The first I have presented to your worship, Damir, and today I will again, if I meet him, I will present him the other book. So Mr. Suchas is still going well. He's so energetic, even, you know, all these, you know, health problems. So it is something which is working inside him, behind him, and of course, when we say behind him, Unfortunately, his better half is not there, but his family, it's a pillar for him. So I wish Mr. Sucha all the best in his life, and I wish all the best for the family. They must continue taking care of him. Thanks a lot.