Peanut Gallery Vancouver City Council
| | Est. 12,026 HE | |

All right, good morning and welcome to the Vancouver City Council meeting of Tuesday, July the 14th, 2020-26. This meeting is being held in person and by electronic means. Council members and the public may participate by either method. Any members joining electronically are reminded to enable their video to confirm quorum. This meeting is being live streamed on the city's website and YouTube. Meeting progress will be updated on X and threads at vancityclerk.ca. Though due to new posting limits, updates will only cover essential items such as vote results. Speakers are encouraged to monitor the live stream to track meeting progress, but please note there is a slight delay. Call in or arrive soon after receiving your reminder email so you are ready when your name is called. Now, in the case of an emergency requiring an evacuation, there are two exits located beyond the glass doors and to the left. If the glass doors are blocked, please use one of the four additional exits within the chamber, as you can see on the side here. Do not use the elevator. Use the stairs instead. If you do require assistance, please remain where you are, and one of our super-friendly security team members will guide you to a safe location. There's also a defibrillator located at the end of this chamber just down the hallway. I do want to acknowledge that we are hosting today's council meeting on the traditional territories of the Musqueam, Squamish, and Squalor Tooth First Nations, and I do want to thank them for their generosity and hospitality and love and care. They show this great land that we get to live, work, and play on. I also want to acknowledge and thank all of our team members throughout the city of Vancouver who, you know, work with incredible passion and purpose to make the city a better place for all of us. So with that, can we please have a roll call?

Clerk 10:31:57

Mayor Sim in the chair with a leave of absence for personal reasons from 1 to 4 p.m. Councillor Kirby Young.

Councillor Dominato.

Councillor Bligh. Councillor Fry. Councillor Montague.

Present.

Clerk 10:32:14

Councillor Klassen. Present. With a leave of absence for civic business from 4 p.m. to 6 p.m., Councillor Meiszner.

Present.

Clerk 10:32:22

Councillor Zhoul.

Present.

Clerk 10:32:23

Councillor Orr. Present. Councillor Maloney. This meeting has quorum, Mayor Sim.

Thank you. So the plan for today, we're going to break at noon for lunch, followed by the in-camera meeting, return... At 3 p.m. to continue to deal with the remainder of the agenda, adjourn or recess by 5 p.m. as we have a public hearing at 6 p.m.

Clerk 10:32:44

If we do recess, the reconvene date is Thursday, July the 16th, 2026 at 1 p.m. pending council approval of recommended changes to the council meeting schedule. Otherwise, it will be 3 p.m. as currently scheduled. Council is required to meet in camera later this week. The reasons and authority under the Vancouver Charter are listed in the agenda. Would someone like to move the motion to move in camera later on this week? Thank you, Councillor Klassen. I'm seconded by Councillor Meiszner. All those in favour, say aye. All those opposed say nay. The motion carries unanimously. Minutes one, or sorry, minutes. Minutes one are from the council meeting following the standing committee on finance and services on May the 20th and 21st, 2026. Are there any corrections to the minutes? Would someone like to move adoption? Great. Councillor Kirby Young seconded by Councillor Klassen. All those in favour say yay. All those opposed say nay. Great. The motion carries unanimously. Minutes two are from the council meeting on June the 2nd and 9th, 2026. Are there any corrections? Would someone like to move adoption? Great. Councillor Meiszner, seconded by Councillor Zhou. All those in favour say aye. All those opposed say nay. Great. The motion carries unanimously. Minutes three are from the public hearing on June the 2nd, 2026. Are there any corrections to the minutes? Great. Would someone like to move adoption? Great. I think that was Councillor Kirby-Young, seconded by Councillor Zhou. All those in favour say aye. All those opposed say nay. Great. The motion carries unanimously. Minutes four are from the council meeting following the Standing Committee on Policy and Strategic Priorities on June the 3rd, 2026. Are there any corrections? Would someone like to move adoption? Great, Councillor Meiszner, seconded by Councillor Montague. All those in favour, say aye. All those opposed, say nay. Great, the motion carries unanimously. Minutes five are from the Special Council Amend Election By-law number 9070 meeting on June the 9th, 2026. Are there any corrections to the minutes? Would someone like to move adoption? Councillor Zhou, thank you. Seconded by Councillor Meiszner. All those in favour, say yay. All those opposed, say nay. Great, the motion carries unanimously. Minutes six are from the business license hearing on June the 10th, 2026. Are there any corrections to the minutes? Would someone like to move adoption? Great, Councillor Meiszner. Seconded by Councillor Montague. All those in favour, say yay.

All those opposed say nay. Great. The motion carries unanimously. Minute seven are from the Mayor's Budget Task Force Implementation Oversight Committee meeting on July the 6th, 2026. Are there any corrections to the minutes? Would someone like to move adoption? I agree. Councillor Kirby Young, seconded by Councillor Montague. All those in favour say yay. All those opposed say nay. Great. The motion carries unanimously. Okay. Agenda variants. Due to the volume of council reports on today's agenda and the necessity of dealing with certain items today,

Clerk 10:35:33

Team members have requested that the order of business be varied to consider any held referral reports, bylaws 1 through 36, and the administrative motion immediately following matters adopted on consent. Team members have also requested that council consider bylaw 37 immediately following the completion of report 3 as bylaw 37 is subject to approval of report 3. Under Section 3.4b of the Procedure By-law, an agenda variance is not debatable and requires a two-thirds vote. Would someone like to move the motion to this effect? Councillor Montague, thank you. Seconded by Councillor Klassen. Great.

I am now going to call the vote. A reminder that the motion requires two-thirds support. All those in favour say yay. All those opposed say nay. Great.

The motion carries with the required majority and council will consider any held referral reports bylaws 1 through 36 and the administrative motion immediately following. Matters adopted on consent. Further, council will consider a bylaw 37 immediately following report three.

Okay, so we will now continue with matters adopted on consent.

Clerk 10:37:02

We have communications 1 and 2, reports 5, 6, 8, 10, 11, and 13 through 25, and 27, and 28, and referral reports 1 through 5 on the consent agenda for council's consideration. We will hold reports 1 through 4, 7, 9, and 12 to hear from speakers. We will hold report 26 at the request of team members to allow the applicant an opportunity to speak to council as staff are recommending that the application be referred back to staff for further consideration. Council may adopt the recommendations for communications 1 and 2, reports 5, 6, 8, 10, 11, and 13 through 25, and 27 and 28, and referral reports 1 through 5 on consent. Does any member wish to hold any of these items for questions to team members or debate? Please bear with me because there's a lot going on here.

Okay, Councillor Zhou.

Yeah, thanks, Mayor. Report number five, please.

Clerk 10:38:20

So report five, Councillor Zhou, thank you very much. Councillor Kirby-Young?

Yeah, thanks, Mayor. So trusting that report four has been held for speakers, I would also like to hold report 11, Community Economic Development Hub, at 188 Jackson, please.

Clerk 10:38:36

Sorry, I missed that. So you're just holding report number 11?

Yes, please.

Clerk 10:38:40

Yes.

Thank you. Councillor Montague?

Thanks, Mayor. Communications report one, please.

Clerk 10:38:49

Communication number one. Thank you. Councillor Bligh?

They've been held the Wednesday.

Clerk 10:38:55

Thank you. Councillor Orr?

Thank you.

Reports 13, 18, 19, 20...

25. 26.

Oh, right, that one's already done. 27. And referral report three.

Clerk 10:39:29

Okay, so, Councillor Orr, you're holding reports 13, 18, 19, 20, 25, 27, and referral report number three. That's correct.

Okay. Okay, before we consider the consent agenda, if anyone believes that the, sorry, Councillor Maloney.

Referral report number one, please.

Clerk 10:39:55

Referral report number one. Thank you. Okay. Before we consider the consent agenda, if anyone believes that they have a conflict of interest, now is the time to declare it. Does anybody have a conflict of interest they want to declare? Okay.

So just bear with me for two seconds here. Sorry, three minutes here.

So, Clerk, if you can make sure I have things correct here.

Clerk 10:41:31

We have communication number two, report number six, eight, ten. 14 through 17, 21 through 24, and 28. And then referral reports two, four, and five for the, to be approved on consent. Is that correct?

Awesome. Okay.

Clerk 10:42:01

Would someone like to move adoption of the recommendations before council contained in the reports? Councillor Kerby-Young, seconded by Councillor Montague. All those in favour, say aye. All those opposed, say nay. The motion carries unanimously. And so, give me two more seconds here.

I just want to make sure I get this right here.

17.

okay and clerk if you can correct me if I

Clerk 10:43:32

get this wrong here okay uh so the following has uh or have been approved on consent uh communication number two uh reappointment of vancouver city of vancouver representative to ubcm executive board report number six below market lease and grant to marple terrorist co-op at 8695 southwest marine drive Report number eight, Vancouver Heritage Foundation VHF Heritage Conservation Grants Program, annual report 2025 through to 2026 and grant release for 2026. Report number 10, consultation for rezoning applications to amend the Vancouver official development plan.

Report number 14 revision of approval in principle CD-1 rezoning 282 West 49th Avenue. Report number 15, revision of approval in principle, CD-1 rezoning 8080 Yukon Street. Report number 16, CD-1 rezoning 6212 through 6218 Ash Street. Report number 17, CD-1 amendment, CD-1499 East Fraserlands, Area 2 South, 3202 through 3270 Riverwalk Avenue, Parcel 11. Then we go to report number 21, CD-1 rezoning 466 through 476 West 27th Avenue. Report number 22, CD-1 rezoning 365 through 395 West Broadway. Report number 23, CD-1 rezoning 1088 West 12th Avenue. Report number 24, CD-1 rezoning 1618 through 1680 East Hastings Street. And then report number 28, CD-1 Then we go to Referral Report Number 2, CD-1708, Text Amendment 2538-2550, Birch Street and 1293-1298, West Broadway. Referral Report Number 4, Vancouver ODP Amendment and CD-1 Rezoning 2516, Commercial Drive and 1704, East Broadway. And then Referral Report Number 5, Vancouver ODP Amendment and CD-1 rezoning 6525 through 6577 Oak Street. Does that? Yes. Awesome. Great. Okay. So the first item of business is communication number one. Oh.

Okay.

Sorry. Two seconds.

All right, sorry about that. There are a lot of moving parts here. So we're going to jump to the referral report. So the first one is referral report number one. CD-1 rezoning, 111 East 5th Avenue and 2060 Quebec Street. Before we begin this agenda item, if anyone believes that they have a conflict of interest, now is the time to declare it. Does anybody have a conflict of interest to declare? Seeing none, this item does not have a team member presentation. And did someone? No one? Oh, Councillor Maloney. Councillor Maloney, you held this item. You have up to five minutes to ask questions of team members.

Thanks. I've asked that this... be withheld or not referred on the basis that I've moved a motion tomorrow, the purpose of which it's number five member motion addressing the risks of digital infrastructure. seeking that council direct staff to propose a regulatory framework that would ensure our city learns lessons from other cities that have allowed AI data centres to go ahead and proposing a public impact requirement for applicants.

Clerk 10:49:09

Thank you for the question. Templar Sanktranajstic, Director of Rezoning. So just for today, today's decision for council is whether to refer this to public hearing or a council for decision. That is the decision for today. I appreciate it's a day before your motion is considered. So council's options today are to refer and send it on word afters, and you can have the debate tomorrow at committee. or you can hold referral until after your debate and it can be referred at a subsequent date too. So it is really up to council how you'd like to move forward with this application, but the staff recommendations today are to refer to public hearing.

Thanks. I appreciate that. I would like to defer the referral of this until the following meeting. I'm aware that this means that it wouldn't be heard before the before Council breaks, but that would be my preference for this, given that I would like the body of work to be undertaken should Council pass my motion before consideration of that at public hearing.

Clerk 10:50:18

I'll just add as well for council's benefit just to council Maloney's point for us to meet our notice requirements under the charter we do need to get notice out for public hearing tomorrow if it's going to be heard on the 23rd for example we do have other dates available to us as well I think subject to comms report that was just adopted or has been held for debate too So there are other dates that we can pick. We just need to make sure we have sufficient time, minimum seven days notice. So that's usually like the Wednesday before a Thursday meeting or the Monday before a Tuesday meeting kind of thing. So there are options to pick that report for a later date up to the end of July. I think the 28th would be our last date. But I appreciate that there are implications for notice and whether or not it could be heard. Okay.

I've got a question. Do I need to propose a motion that this be considered for referral at the next round of council meetings or do I just vote against it and that will happen anyway?

Clerk 10:51:20

So if council were not to refer this today, we'd probably want some clear direction about what to do and whether to bring it back subsequently or whether you referred this to another date for consideration. So I'd maybe have to lean on clerks for some extra content on this. If it wasn't dealt with now... and was dealt with later in the agenda, whether it's later today or if this meeting is reconvened on another date, you could consider the report at that point. Again, we are just looking for a date where we have a public hearing. I believe our comms report number one seeks to cancel the July 28th public hearing date, which was our other council date backup. So there are some logistical challenges depending on what council chooses to do if you weren't to refer today. Okay. Yeah.

Perhaps is there any guidance from the clerks about that?

Sorry. Chair, if I could get guidance from the clerks about perhaps the wording of a motion to, because I don't want it to necessarily disappear. I'm just asking that it be referred to a future meeting for referral, consideration of referral.

Clerk 10:52:48

Sorry, clerks, do you guys need a recess for a couple of minutes?

Okay, I'm just going to stop the time here.

Councillor Maloney?

Sorry. I've sent around a, I guess it's an amendment or a motion. Okay.

So I'm just going to put you to the amendment queue, please.

Clerk 10:57:13

Please go ahead.

Thank you. I hope everyone's received that. And thanks to staff for helping me find the right words for it. It's that council refer referral report one to the Standing Committee on City Finance and Services on July 15, 2025 under reports. And that will give us a chance to debate the member motion that I have put forward prior to deciding whether it's an appropriate thing to refer this to public hearing. Thanks.

Clerk 10:57:51

Do you have a seconder?

Councillor Black. Okay.

Councillor Kirby Young.

I have a question to staff, if I might, and through you, Chair, and that is, what is the, if the Council does refer this as per the agenda prepared, what is the scheduled or anticipated public hearing date for the item?

Clerk 10:58:14

Thank you for the question. So if Council were to refer this item at today's meeting, the schedule for the public hearing would be on the 23rd of July. There are quite a few reports scheduled for the 23rd of July, so it'll be just a matter of capacity to get through that day, but it'll be scheduled for that day.

Okay. All right. Thanks for the answer that I am speaking to the referral amendment, the referral to refer the referral report. I'm going to vote in opposition. The referral, the consideration of public hearing anticipated date comes after the council meeting tomorrow. But regardless, it would be highly unusual procedure. to refer items based on theoretical policy that Council has yet to consider or adopt. And I don't think that that is a good precedent. I think Council can dispose of the business in the order that it has come forward. Thank you.

Clerk 10:59:02

Thank you very much.

Seeing no one else in the queue, we'll put Councillor Maloney's amendment to a vote.

All right, and that fails with myself, Councillors Kirby Young, Don Minato, Montague, Klaassen, Meisner, and Joe in opposition.

Um, so with that, um, would someone like, uh, to move, uh, the motion on the original great Councillor, Councillor Dominato, second by Councillor, um, Glasson, um, councillors during the discussion.

Yeah, I'm now going to call the vote.

Clerk 10:59:59

If you can please go to the voting screen.

and that passes uh with uh councillors fry and or in opposition and councillor maloney abstaining so that includes that would be referral report number one right

So now we're going to refer a report number three. And that's the Vancouver ODP amendment to 500 Dunsmuir Street, 619 through 655 Richard Street, 501 through 565 West Georgia Street and 388 Abbott Street and CD-1 rezoning. 500 Dunsmuir Street, 619 through 655 Richard Street, 501 through 595 West Georgia Street, and 620 through 698 Seymour Street, and 388 Abbott Street. Before we begin this agenda item, if anyone believes that they have a conflict of interest, now is the time to declare it. Does anybody have a conflict of interest? seeing none uh this item does not have a team member member presentation and i believe counselor or uh you held this item so you have up to five minutes to ask questions of team members

Clerk 11:01:43

Thanks.

Got that figured out. Yeah, so my question's pretty simple. It's just around the referral of this report before council has a chance to hear the higher buildings policy zoning and land use report that is coming. So this is... would be a very tall building, maybe the tallest in Canada, I believe. And putting this referral report to public hearing before we hear from the public on what they wanted to see on the high building review, I think that we're putting the cart before the horse here.

Clerk 11:02:20

So some clarity on that.

Thanks for the question, Councillor Orr. So the referral report does speak to this in some detail in the body of the report, as well as the resolutions. And without weighing into the merits of either path, staff acknowledge that that policy is underway and that work is going through public engagement right now. The report and the project is otherwise gone through our review and public engagement and staff reviews and is ready for consideration. We do acknowledge that again in the report, as I mentioned, which I won't speak to in detail, which does include two resolutions. One is the consideration of the project, and the other is to refer back pending the outcome of that. So those are all very much debatable items for the public hearing as well.

Okay. Thanks for that clarity. I appreciate it. Thanks. Thank you very much. Councillor Dominato?

Sorry. I actually had the same question, so I appreciate that that was asked. Thank you.

Thank you very much. Okay, seeing no one else in the queue, would someone like to move a motion? Great. Councillor Claston, I think Councillor Zhou seconded it before you. Council, is there any discussion? Okay, so I'm now going to call the vote. If we could please go to the voting panel.

Clerk 11:03:44

Great, and that passes with Councillor Frey abstaining.

Okay, and that concludes Referral Report Number 3.

Okay.

Clerk 11:04:09

We're going to go to bylaws now. We have 37 bylaws on the agenda for enactment. We will consider bylaws 1336 now and consider bylaw 37 after the completion of report number three.

Sorry, just bear with me for one second.

Clerk 11:04:43

Okay, before we begin this agenda item, if anyone believes that they have a conflict of interest, now is the time to declare it. Does anybody have a conflict of interest to declare? Seeing none. Council members who were present for the meetings related to public hearing enactment bylaws must confirm that they, sorry, council members who were absent for the meetings related to public hearing enactment bylaws must confirm that they have reviewed the proceedings of the meetings, including the video clip, to be eligible to vote. Bylaw 12 was from the public hearing. On February the 10th, 2026, Councillors Frye, Classen, Orr, and myself were absent for this item at the public hearing. Councillor Frye, have you reviewed the proceedings and will you be voting on the enactment? Councillor Klassen? I have and I will. Councillor Orr? And I have not and will not. Bylaw 13 was from the public hearing on February the 17th and March the 4th, 2026. Councillor Bligh and myself were absent for this item at the public hearing. Councillor Bligh, have you reviewed the proceedings and will you be voting on the enactment? And I have not and I will not. Bylaw 15 was from the public hearing on January the 16th and 18th, 2018. All of council needs to have reviewed the proceedings to be eligible to vote. Councillor Bligh, have you reviewed the proceedings and will you be voting on the enactment? Councillor Dominato. Great. Councillor Frye. Great. Councillor Kirby Young. Councillor Klassen. Having it, Will. Councillor Maloney. Great. Councillor Meiszner. Great. Councillor Montague. Great. Councillor Orr. Councillor Zhou? And myself, I have not and will not. By-law 16 was from the public hearing on October the 30th, 2025. Councillor Bligh and myself were absent for this item at the public hearing. Councillor Bligh, have you reviewed the proceedings and will you be voting on the enactment?

And I have not and I will not. By-law 17 was from the public hearing on March the 13th, 2025. Councillors Claston, Maloney, Orr, and myself were absent for this item at the public hearing. Councillor Klassen, have you reviewed the proceedings and will you be voting on the enactment? I have and I will. Councillor Maloney? Councillor Orr? And I have not and will not. Bylaw 18 was from the public hearing on June the 19th and 24th, 2025. Councillors Bly, Dominato, Orr, and myself were absent for this item at the public hearing. Councillor Bligh, have you reviewed the proceedings and will you be voting on the enactment? Councillor Dominato? Councillor Orr? Right, and I have not and will not. By-law 35 was from the public hearing on July the 10th, 2025. Councillor Montague was absent for this item at the public hearing. Councillor Montague, have you reviewed the proceedings and will you be voting on the enactment? Would someone like to move the motion to adopt by-laws 1 through 36? Great, great. I think that was Councillor Domenato and seconded by Councillor Klassen. Council, is there any discussion?

Clerk 11:07:45

All those in favor say yay. All those opposed say nay. Great, the motion carries unanimously. The list of approved bylaws can be found on the city's website.

Okay, the next item on the agenda is administrative motions. Number one, 2026 Finance Growth Update, Bill 16 Compliance Update to Density Bonus Provisions and Inclusionary Zoning. Before we begin this agenda item,

If anyone believes that they have a conflict of interest, now is the time to declare it. Does anybody have a conflict of interest to disclose? Okay. Council, are there any questions to the team members?

Great. Councillor Klassen, I think that was Councillor Kirby-Young. Thank you. Council, any discussion? All those in favour, say yay. All those opposed, say nay.

Clerk 11:08:38

Great. The motion carries unanimously.

We're back to communications.

Okay. Communication number one, changes to the 2026 council meeting schedule. Before we begin this agenda item, if anyone believes that they have a conflict of interest, now is the time to declare it. Does anybody have a conflict to disclose? Council.

Clerk 11:09:05

Montague, you held this item.

You have up to five minutes to ask questions of team members.

Yeah, sorry. I've actually put in an amendment to all of council. Everyone should have it by now. It's fairly straightforward. It's just that... Council changed the Standing Committee on Policy and Strategic Policies on July 29th to a meeting reserve. And I'm putting this forward because of, well, we've seen the report, the communications report that came out from staff. There was also a memo that went from the clerks to all of council. I guess about a week ago now, that basically says there just isn't enough time left in the current meeting schedule to deal with all of council business.

This report actually starts to include meeting reserves on Saturdays. And without sufficient meeting reserves, we will likely be required to do either more weekends or push council business into August. One of my concerns is that, again, we just don't have the sufficient time to finish what we need to do. And if we do push into weekends and into August, I would suggest that we will likely run into quorum issues as well. So the amendment is to add a K to the lengthy changes that staff and clerks have already proposed to council and to change the committee meeting on the 29th to a reserve. Thanks. I'm just going to pause for one sec here.

Clerk 11:10:51

Clerk. Okay. Yeah. Okay.

Okay, so Councillor Kirby-Young moved the motion. I think it was seconded by Councillor Klassen. And then, so council members, is there any discussion?

Clerk 11:11:31

Sorry?

Yeah, I don't think that this amendment is in order in terms of 8.7a. I would like the chair to roll this.

Okay, hold on. Before we go there, I just want to make sure we're in the right queue here.

Bear with me for one second here. Okay, so we're in the amendment queue here. We are in discussion.

we have to do a point of order right away that supersedes all the people in the queue okay sorry thank you okay so counselor or can you please go ahead

Thank you. Yes, I believe this is not compatible with the purpose and objects of the Vancouver Charter, including the good rule of government and the city. I don't know. I can't speak for everyone, but I know a lot of us have spent a lot of time making motions, consulting with community, consulting with stakeholders for the next standing committee. I believe that we owe it to the electorate to go through with those motions, and I don't believe that this is an order. Thanks.

All right, so I'm going to take a recess for a couple of minutes and get some guidance from the clerks and the city manager.

Okay, so I just spoke with the city manager and the team here, and I'm going to rule that this is in order. So council is authorized to council or change meeting schedules according to section 2.7 of the procedure bylaw. And given that the bylaw permits it, it is not out of order.

Clerk 11:16:02

Councillor Montague.

Oh, can we get a seconder, please? Great.

Councillor Dominato, thank you very much.

Clerk 11:16:19

Yeah, sorry. I don't think...

Otherwise, I'd just say that in addition to what I said earlier, is that we have one item today, later today, that's going to take three days. And I think council just simply doesn't have the time to get through our business this month.

Thank you very much. Councillor Bligh.

Yeah, thanks very much. I am just curious if our city legal was part of the consultation analysis of the point of order as previous. It's a question I have.

I know that the mayor and the city manager and the clerk, but I would like to know that legal has confirmed that it's not in violation of the charter because appropriate notice has not been given from my read on things.

Clerk 11:17:14

So through the chair to legal.

My time is going, so if anyone can just respond would be great.

Through the chair to the city manager.

Clerk 11:17:30

Can I have a timer stop, please?

Recess.

We're back.

Clerk 11:27:49

I'm going to start the timer. Okay.

So, Councillor Bligh.

So, one, the decisions around points of order are at the sole purview of the chair. Secondly, decisions on who the chair consults is also at the sole purview of the chair. In this case, legal was consulted on my decision. And finally, I do want to emphasize that points of order are not debatable, but there is a process for a councillor to challenge the chair's ruling under the procedure bylaw. So with that, I'm going to say this is an order.

Clerk 11:28:36

And here we go, councillor.

Thank you.

Yeah, I would like to challenge the chair. I think per Councillor Orr's original point of order and referencing the Vancouver Charter and the rule of law, under the Section 164 of the Vancouver Charter, Article D, it requires advanced public notice respecting the time, place, and date of council and committee meetings and established procedures for giving that notice. A, this does not meet the procedure for giving that notice, and I will note that the agenda for the 29th meeting is published online for all of the public, and these are established. So, in fact, I think you have misruled by not consulting the actual Vancouver Charter, which is the essence of good governance.

Clerk 11:29:29

All right, we'll take another recess.

Okay.

So we're back. We have quorum. Great. So Councillor Orr is appealing my decision. Is there a seconder? Great. Councillor Bligh.

Clerk 11:33:47

Is there any... That's right.

And so he's appealing my decision. And so he's appealed. Councillor Bligh has seconded this. So now we're going to discuss, like, the, you know, the motion to appeal. Is there any discussion?

Well, if it's necessary for me to reiterate the content of the Vancouver Charter that I had originally cited, if that's helpful, it's Section 164 of the Vancouver Charter, Article D, of course, Counselor Orr's reference to the procedure bylaw. specifically good governance under the Vancouver Charter. The Vancouver Charter 164 subsection D does require advanced public notice respecting the time, place, and date of council and committee meetings and establish procedures for giving that notice. The committee meeting that is scheduled for July 29th, for which there are... is likely official city business that our clerks and staff have scheduled, but also declarations that council members may indeed wish to introduce member motions for that same day, which is the scheduled and appropriate time. This does violate the basic tenet of the Vancouver Charter to establish those schedules and rules.

Thank you very much, Councillor Kirby-Yonk.

Yeah, thanks, Chair. I believe that in response to my colleagues' comments that the interpretation is incorrect. Council may resolve, and I'm paraphrasing, to change the time and date of any meetings of Council or Standing Committee at its discretion at any time. And that is exactly what we're doing today with this report. We're changing a number of the different committee meetings to accommodate the extraordinary volume of business that we have in front of us. And so this is no different. It simply is an addition to the date, but the very report itself. resolved to change any dates, which is the purview of council to do so. And so, to me, it's just illogical that a different... This is Councillor Frye. I'm speaking. I'll let you speak. To me, it is just illogical that we would apply a different interpretation and standard to one specific date versus the body of a reporter. Any other changes of dates that have come forth to this council, I'll also note that It's 15 days out and no agendas have been published for the public. So there are no expectations from the public's perspective of anything that happens at this meeting. And I think that from a governance perspective, the first responsibility in my mind of council. is to disclose the large volume of business that we have in front of us, which includes a number of fairly significant reports, a number of public hearings, some of which have an extraordinarily high level of public interest and are going to require a significant number of hours to complete. I've sat on council for two terms. I've been on councils that have also been very busy and logged an extraordinary number of hours. But we are really facing the clock down here, and we have a responsibility to finish the primary business of council. Thank you.

A point of information, if I may, Mayor, and perhaps I was mistaken.

Chair, if we're following procedure, I will just note that Councillor Fry does not have the floor, and there is a queue for any points of information or points of procedure. Thank you.

Councillor Dominato.

Thank you, Mayor. I have a point of parliamentary procedure to the clerks. And just to confirm, in voting, this is the challenge of the chair. Could you just affirm that if we're upholding the chair, which way, just to...

So in voting on... Chair is being challenged. Could you just confirm how we vote? Sometimes it's been confusing in the past. We're wanting to uphold the chair's ruling.

Clerk 11:37:40

Yes, those in favor of Councillor Fry's appeal would vote in favor, and those opposed to the appeal would vote in opposition. Thank you. And it would require eight votes in favor of the appeal or that to go forward. Okay, thank you.

Thank you very much. Councillor Bligh.

Yeah, thanks very much. I'm speaking in support of the challenging of the chair. Appreciate Councillor Fry's references to the charter. What I feel is more relevant in this situation, which may or may not be clear to the public, but what we're facing here is that procedurally members of this council have an opportunity to call notice on motions at council meetings to be heard two weeks later at the committee meeting. Every member here, all 11 of us, have been sort of following that as a procedural norm. And here we are two weeks out before the last round of meetings, and today being the last opportunity to call notice on a motion to be heard in the last standing committee meeting of this term, which is... the meeting that is essentially being proposed by Councillor Montague to be made a reserve, which will eliminate any opportunity for any member to bring a motion forward that meeting as is outlined in our typical procedure. I would be curious if this has ever happened before. I would probably bet, based on decades going back, that this is an unprecedented move. And rather than quote... The charter, I think, for me, it's more relevant to the local government oath of office regulation, which is that we all commit to acting and carrying out our duties with integrity, to be respectful of others, and to demonstrate leadership and collaboration. And I think what you hear here, and myself included, an intention to have... Only two motions that are timely and necessary before September 9th. I plan to call notice today. One was an opportunity for us to submit, ask staff to look at submitting a site, city-owned land, to Build Canada Homes as part of a portfolio approach that municipalities across the country are doing to access housing for non-market, sorry, funding for non-market housing through the Build Canada Homes initiative. It's called From the Ground. It's a campaign that's currently underway. And in a housing crisis and affordability crisis, I should say, more so than anything at this moment, I think it's a priority that we get that done before September 9th. And this would have been my only opportunity to do that. And this campaign really lifted off only in the last couple of weeks. We've talked about it at Metro Regional Planning. other municipalities in our region are working on it. This is called governance, and this is a very practical and normal application of our role here, regardless of the politics that can be played out in this chamber. So I think that... that anybody supporting this is acting in violation of the oath of office that they signed when they were inaugurated almost four years ago. And I think it's an egregious stretch of a dominating force in this chamber where a majority of people, counselors, members, know that they have the votes to move whatever they want and then interpret the charter and or the oath of office and so forth. I am vehemently opposed to this. I think it breaks all the rules of good governance. It breaks the oath of office. And I 100% support challenging the chair on this ruling as a result.

Councillor Frye. Yeah, just a point of information. We're still on the challenge of the chair. Councillor Kirby Young sort of suggested this was just a scheduling change and a rescheduling. Can I be clear? A, if this is a complete elimination of the scheduled any meetings, this means there will be no further standing committee meetings. And also, if I may, also as a point of information through you to the clerks, are there items that staff have anticipated and scheduled for the standing committee on July 29th? I would anticipate that typically there are, so...

Clerk 11:42:10

It is on our calendar as a set meeting for the public.

If there are reports that are on that agenda, which I don't believe there are yet, the agenda has not been created, reports could be moved to the council meeting the day before if there's a section of the order of business that it would fall under. And there are no more standing committee meetings.

So this would effectively eliminate any future standing committee meetings were this decision to go ahead? Okay, I'll speak more generally later, but that was my point of information. Thank you. Thank you.

All right, I'm going to call the vote. So I just want to be very clear. We are voting on the appeal. And so the chair's ruling was that Councillor Montague's... amendment would it be to um communication number one is in order and so a two-thirds majority is required to overrule it so if you are in support of uh councillor fry's challenge you would vote in favor if you are opposed to councillor fry's challenge you would vote opposed is that all clear it's a little all right thank you so we'll call the vote

Awesome. Okay. So Councillor Fry's appeal to the chair's ruling fails with myself, Councillors Kirby Young, Don Minato, Montague, Klaassen, Meisner, and Joe in opposition.

Clerk 11:44:31

We're back on the amendment queue.

Lost track of everything here. Okay, Councillor Bligh.

Yeah. Thanks. I... You know, I have made my considerations pretty clear on this. And just because you can doesn't mean you should is really what it comes down to. I wonder if this council is going to be amenable to any urgent motions today that may not be deemed urgent but have become urgent because of the elimination of the last standing committee of this term. And so I'm not asking for anybody to weigh in, but I'd ask you to consider that now in light of this. I'm obviously not going to support it, but it's obviously going to pass. It's anti-democratic from my perspective, but my ask is that there's a consideration for any last urgent motions that are moved this afternoon to make sure that things can be considered before this term ends. Thank you.

Thank you very much. Councillor Kirby-Young.

Yeah, I have a point of information through you to staff, if I might, just with respects to Jay and the staff memo. And it's regarding the cancellation of the scheduled public hearing on... July 28th and change to meeting reserve. Can you just advise if there are any, with that specific change, if there are any projects that were slated for approval, are they getting that will not be considered by this council or be delayed to future dates? Are they moving to other dates? Can I just get some color on that, please?

Clerk 11:46:14

Thank you for the question, Councillor. So the plan with the changes proposed in this comms report plus the referrals that you just had would be to schedule all of those on the 23rd and then rely on the reserve dates to get through them if we don't complete on the 23rd. So you'd have reserve dates on the 24th, 25th, 27th, and 28th to get through what we can through those dates.

Okay. So just to be very clear, we're not taking any projects off this council's docket. We're just simply changing the flow. Correct. Okay. Thank you very much.

Thank you very much. Councillor Frye?

Yeah, you know, I fundamentally oppose this, you know, because we did take an oath of office. We do have a job to do. I've been on council also like Councillor Kirby Young for two terms now, and we have had to extend past our. our comfort zone into our vacation time to dispense with council business. That's our job. And yes, sometimes we get extraordinary schedules and yes, that's our job and we have to do the work. We heard from the clerks on a point of information that in fact, any outstanding business that was otherwise anticipating to come forward. in the scheduled standing committee for July 29th, would likely be accommodated through other meetings that we have scheduled, i.e. the Council of July 28th. So that will add to our general time. Really, the only effect that this motion then brings about, this amendment, is to eliminate the opportunity for any council member motions to be introduced for debate and decision on the 29th, if we're assuming that any other... city business that would have been scheduled for the 29th will be redistributed to some of our existing council meeting, which would be the 28th. So I do feel this is really wholly undemocratic approach to change the meeting schedule, knowing full well that we have no opportunity to advance council member motions, that we are denying the public the scheduled meetings that we do have on the books, and I would counter that, in fact, it is an obligation that we have to adhere to that schedule. It's published well in advance. Anybody can look at our public meeting schedule right now, and where the agendas aren't published, the days certainly are, and they go well into after the summer break and into the election period. We continue to do the business of counsel. I think this is an incredibly poor form, and it really does eliminate our democratic process. And it's very unfortunate that it would be coming down to such a partisan approach to that.

Councillor Orr. Thanks. Yeah, just addressing sort of the question of, you know, we're not going to have enough time. I mean, just looking at the recommendations here. Council add a meeting from 1 to 5. Council add a meeting reserve 9.30 to 5. Council change the start time for an extra two hours here on D. Council add a meeting reserve 9.30 to 4. Council change the time 3 to 5 from 9.30 to 5. Council, add a meeting reserve 5 to 10. Council, add a meeting reserve 9.30 to 10. Council, add a meeting reserve 9.30 to 10. That is, I don't know, I'm not really good at quick math, but that's 60 to 70 extra hours that we have to do this business. We have enough time to do this. That's not even including the meeting reserves that are already on the schedule, which is another probably 30 hours. That's over 100 hours that we have to do to finish the rest of the business before we go, I guess, on holiday in August. I don't know what we all have planned. I don't have anything planned yet. I'm ready to do the work, do the work that I was elected to do and sit and finish all of the business that we have in council meetings. And this seems inherently political. This seems like a political move. This doesn't seem like a practical move or anything. This seems that it's about limiting debate and limiting motions that are coming forward to the floor. It's also a waste of taxpayer money in the sense that we've put in hours of work crafting motions. I have five actually that I wanted to bring forward. I have a political assistant who I've hired. The taxpayers hire, who has put in, I don't know, I don't have his timesheets, but... tons of hours on these motions that are now just going to hit the floor and sit in dust. This is a waste of taxpayers' money. It's democratically egregious. It's politically motivated. And I'm shocked, honestly, that we're doing this. And hopefully, you know, the public probably doesn't pay too much mind to procedural things like this, but hopefully they do because this is egregious in my mind. Thanks.

Alistair Maloney.

Thanks. I am firmly opposed to this and I also want to be very clear about what's being proposed. The majority already has the votes to make this happen and it looks like the majority are choosing to stop members of council, opposition members, from bringing forward work that's taken weeks in collaboration with community. And it has been just confirmed that that is the only thing it does. It stops opposition council members from moving member motions. It's very clear that no members of the majority are contemplating moving member motions because otherwise why would they be voting to put this through? So Councillor Montague's amendment takes away the ability of opposition council members to bring any more... member motions. Today we would have had the opportunity to call notice on our draft motions that were submitted yesterday. This has been distributed with no prior notice and I think it's important to point out that Councillor Montague could have chosen to eliminate or defer until after the new council is in any of the other matters. that council is considering. But instead has chosen to deprive opposition council members of the opportunity to bring their motions.

There are no other standing committee meetings and we're in the lead up to an election. So we were expecting, it's been on the list of the schedule that we would have this meeting on the 29th. We've been planning towards it. we haven't hurried the things that we were going to cover. As a result, we're having that opportunity and it's being withdrawn without notice. And I agree that it is political and it's unfair. It's a waste of taxpayers' money and really shameful.

Clerk 11:53:17

Mr Montague. Yeah, I'll just end by saying...

Councillor Maloney, I appreciate that you can assume that other councillors from ABC don't have motions that they want to put forward. I can actually tell you I had a motion on board that I was planning on, one that you would have loved. So it's unfortunate that I don't get to put that forward as well, but not the case. So I just suggest that Councillor Maloney not... assume that we didn't have motions we wanted to put forward um and i would i'm sorry i'll supply would you like to add something or just talk under your breath next to me so unusual um and i would note that uh that counselor or did uh he talked about the additional time that was in the report he also forgot to mention the sentence from the clerks in the report that talks about that. Even if the council were to resolve all these additional changes, that there may not be able, it says, may not be able to complete all the agenda items in the time allotted, including the changes that are being suggested.

Thank you. Councillor Kirby Young.

Yeah, thanks. I'll be brief because I know we have a lot of business to get through, and this has taken quite a bit of time. But I will note that I actually did have a motion I wanted to bring forward. It's been super busy, and I would have liked to have done it. But I recognize that, as I said earlier, we have an extraordinary amount of business. And I considered it, and I heeded the clerk's note, as Councillor Montague referred to, around... some doubt as to whether or not we'll get through the business and that really does have to take Preston in my mind hence my question earlier by changing the public hearing on the

to another date that one that was looking for assurance, we're not taking any of the sort of material business of council, including housing development approvals and a number of the other important reports off the docket.

So I just wanted to share that. Thanks. Thank you very much. All right. We're going to call the vote. And this is on Councillor Montague's amendment.

Great and that passes with Councillors Bligh, Frye, Orr and Maloney in opposition.

All right and so now we're going to bring the motion as amended or communications one as amended to a vote.

Clerk 11:56:13

Councillor Maloney?

Great. And that passes with Councillors Bligh, Frye and Orrin opposition and Councillor Maloney abstaining. That completes item number or communication number one.

Okay, so the next item on the agenda is report number one, the 2026 Community Services Child Care and Other Grants. Before we begin this agenda item, if anyone believes that they have a conflict of interest, now is the time to declare it. Does anybody have a conflict of interest to declare? Okay, seeing no one there. This item does not have a team member presentation. Council, you have up to five minutes to ask questions of team members.

Seeing no one in the queue, we are now going to go and hear from registered speakers for this report. Public speakers should state whether they support or oppose the recommendations and may only speak once. I will also ask speakers if they are residents of Vancouver, if it's not noted on the speakers list.

Clerk 11:57:35

Our first public speaker is Percy Wong.

Yes, thank you. Good morning, Mayor and councillors and city staff. My name is Percy Wong and I'm the Executive Director of Kaya Community Care and Wellness Society. First, I want to sincerely thank the City of Vancouver for considering to support our program at the Community Hub. We are grateful that every dollar will be carefully and directly to support seniors in our community. And Guy applied for $100,000 because our goal was to operate a community hub five days a week. But I don't think we can get it. Hopefully, we can get a 20%. Then that means that we can serve the senior at least once a week. And without your support, I don't think this program can continue. So perhaps we can say that the city has found, hopefully, one very good day for the seniors. But our seniors still have needs for the rest of the week. More than 500 seniors in the downtown Eastside and surrounding community through proactive outreaching approach. We provide fall prevention, service navigation, light housekeeping, professional counseling, professional physiotherapists, health education, and some emotional support. All of our seniors we serve are low-income, socially isolated, and face significant language barriers. Too often, support comes from only after crisis, after a fall, after a serious decline in health, or after an emergency room visit. But our organization Gaia Cares believes in reaching seniors before the crisis. Our community hub has become much more than a social center. We provide talks on Chinese medicine, legal rights, service navigation, personal safety, free cultural appropriate lunch, free haircut. We offer fall prevention exercise, art therapy, and music therapy groups, table tennis activity, and a place where seniors know they can come when they need help. We record approximately 400 seniors attendance every month in four days, right? And if the city grant give us $20,000, it works out approximately about $1,670. That means $4.20 per senior. And the most important impact cannot always be measured by dollar attendance. But through our service, we help seniors feel accepted. And we always speak about building an inclusive city. But inclusion is not only a policy. It's a statement or a slogan. It's really the care and the service for the senior. Thank you.

Thank you very much.

If you have any questions, you can ask with my colleague.

Okay. Awesome. Thank you. Speaker number two, Raphael Aquino.

Clerk 12:01:20

Is Raphael on the line?

Speaker two is not on the line. Speaker number three, Jeanette Mujar.

Not here.

Okay, so that is the end of our speakers list, and I do want to thank everyone for coming to speak to council. So would someone like to move a motion? Thank you. Councillor Claussen, seconded by Councillor Herbie-Young. Council, is there any discussion?

Councillor Meiszner. Yeah, thanks. I'll be quick. I just want to thank Percy and Eva for coming in. You're one of the many great organizations recommended in this report for funding. And I think the seniors community hub is very worthwhile. And I know that you're doing lots of great work in the community to help reduce isolation for seniors and help them have access to activities. So I just want to say that I'm very much in favor of you receiving funding as well as the other organizations in this report. So thanks for being here. Thank you very much. Counselor Orr.

Thanks. Yeah, I guess in lieu of a report from counsel, maybe just a question to staff. Just on sort of some, if you could go over some of the applicants that met the eligibility requirement. but funding was not recommended as grants budget is limited and other applications were rated higher. I mean, there's some pretty well-known organizations in here, Champlain Heights Community Association, Food Stash, Rainbow Refugee, Lookout Housing, Filipino BC. I was wondering if we could just sort of go over that. Is this a question to the staff?

Clerk 12:03:38

Thank you for the question. Margaret Whitkins, General Manager, Arts, Culture, and Community Services. If I could clarify the question, are you seeking kind of a one-by-one overview or more thematic?

Yeah, I don't think, I mean, I don't think that would be fair as there's, you know, other organizations too that probably want answers. I think more of a general sort of overview for why essentially, you know, the budget is limited. You know, is this a relative zero means zero budget kind of thing? We just don't have enough. Is it... a combination of that and sort of an increase in, you know, grant requests as well? Is there, is it a combination of the two or, you know?

Clerk 12:04:15

We certainly see that demand for the grant programs exceeds available funding, as Council is aware. Typically, we see applications that may align with the grant program objectives but don't perform as strongly as part of the interdisciplinary adjudication process. So it is somewhat case by case, but alignment with the objectives and kind of Council priorities is one of the key factors.

Thanks. Yeah, and then just could you refresh just for the public maybe. These organizations are all sort of given a heads up before this meeting. They're told as to why and perhaps how they could make their application stronger.

Clerk 12:04:59

There certainly is proactive communication with each organization, and staff welcome opportunities for individual debriefs on any particular application.

Okay, thanks.

Clerk 12:05:11

Thank you.

Councillor Kirby Young.

Yeah, speaking to the report, I just want to appreciate all the work that was done here. It's pretty significant to know that there's 132 organizations that are receiving $11.254 million in grants from the city of Vancouver. There's a lot of phenomenal nonprofits in our communities and neighborhoods that are doing great work, including child care, the neighborhood houses. social policy grants, a lot of organizations like Yo Bro, Yo Girl, and others that are supporting after-school programs, intervention for youth, things that I think are really aligning with this council's vision to have a safe, caring, and inclusive communities and neighborhoods across the city. I know it's a tough process to adjudicate because there's so many deserving applicants. But I do think that it's really noteworthy about just the scope of allocations that are being made here and the good work that is being done, Recovery Club, Dudes Club upgrades, things like there's facility upgrades, there's some operating grants to close gaps, particularly for infant child care. There's a lot of really great work here, and I'm really happy to see that we're able to support a lot of that. Thank you.

Thank you very much. Okay, seeing no one else in queue, we're going to call it to a vote. Please go to the voting panel.

Clerk 12:06:40

And that passes unanimously.

And that concludes report number one. Thank you very much.

Okay. Report number two. Vancouver General Hospital VGH Campus Broadway Plan Policy Update. Before we begin this agenda item, if anyone believes that they have a conflict of interest, now is the time to declare it. Does anybody have a conflict of interest to declare? Okay. Seeing no one in the queue, this item does have a presentation, and we do have team members to present the item. So please go ahead.

We're all set eyes are visible great

Clerk 12:08:12

Good morning, Mayor and Council. My name is Ken McDougall from the City's Special Project Office. I'm here to present the Vancouver General Hospital Broadway Plan updates.

Shown here is an aerial photo highlighting generally the VGH area in red. The site is a large and unique site located in the Fairview neighborhood, and it's generally bounded by the lane between Broadway and 10th Avenue to the north, 13th Avenue to the south, Oak Street to the west, and Ass Street to the east.

The VGH area is designated institutional in the Vancouver Official Development Plan, which are lands reserved for essential community-serving institutional uses such as major hospitals. VGH is located within the MetroCorp Broadway area, which is the principal center of business, employment, cultural, and entertainment activity in the city and region.

Under the Broadway plan, the VGH institutional area includes broad policy direction to support the expansion of VGH to meet long-term institutional and health care needs. Current policy generally supports building heights up to 350 feet or up to the underside of the Queen Elizabeth Park view cone, and we're not restricted by helicopter flight paths. It seeks improved walking, rolling, and cycling connections, significant public open space, and active ground floor uses are strongly encouraged.

Within the VGH institutional area, Vancouver General Hospital, through Vancouver Coastal Health Authority, or VCH, is the primary landowner. These lands constitute the VGH campus area and are the focus of the policy updates brought forward today. This is an aerial view of the campus as it currently exists. VGH has evolved into a nationally significant referral, teaching, and research hospital whose layered campus reflects more than a century of incremental growth. It remains the largest hospital in BC, providing acute and trauma care, serving as the provincial referral center for many adult programs and specialist services, while also acting as Vancouver's community hospital. Looking ahead, VGH finds itself at a critical juncture in the provision of provincial health care services. With a largely built out and landlocked site, new development requires the demolition of existing buildings to make space for new facilities. THESE NEW FACILITIES MUST BE OPERATIONAL BEFORE OLDER BUILDINGS CAN BE VACATED TO ENSURE CONTINUITY OF PATIENT CARE.

VGH CAMPUS BUILDINGS AND INFRASTRUCTURE ARE AGING WITH 80% OF IMPATIENT BEDS LOCATED IN FACILITIES BUILT BETWEEN 1953 AND 1989. THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT BUILT IN THE MID-1970S IS TOO SMALL FOR CURRENT NEEDS. IMPATIENT AND EMERGENCY BED SHORTAGES CREATE DAILY OPERATIONAL CHALLENGES. WITH A GROWING AND AGING POPULATION IN VANCOUVER, THE REGION AND THE PROVINCE, DEMAND FOR HEALTH CARE SERVICES IS PROJECTED TO INCREASE BY 25% BY 2035, WITH EMERGENCY VOLUMES RISING WHILE AGING BUILDINGS AND LIMITED LAND RESTRICT EXPANSION AND MODERNIZATION.

ACKNOWLEDGING THE CRITICAL ROLE THAT VGH PLAYS IN DELIVERING HEALTH CARE TO ALL BRITISH COLUMBIANS, THERE IS AN OVERWHELMING NEED TO EXPAND AND MODERNIZE HEALTH CARE FACILITIES AT THE CAMPUS AND REDEVELOPMENT IS A KEY PROVINCIAL, REGIONAL AND MUNICIPAL PRIORITY.

Clerk 12:11:24

IN RESPONSE, ACHIEVING HEALTHCARE OBJECTIVES HAS BEEN A PRIMARY DRIVER OF THE CITY PLANNING PROCESSES AND STAFF ARE WORKING TOWARDS DEVELOPING A MORE FLEXIBLE FRAMEWORK OF POLICY AND ZONING THAT PRIORITIZES HEALTHCARE DELIVERY AT THE CAMPUS.

An example of the flexible approach being taken, staff received a rezoning application for the VGH campus in fall of 2025. This application, as well as ongoing collaboration and discussion with VGH, led to three concurrent work streams being undertaken to assess and support VGH in the goal of modernization and expansion of the hospital. First is the development of site-specific policies to guide the long-term redevelopment of the VGH campus. These policies, in the form of Broadway plan updates, are the subject of this report. Second is a requested text amendment to the site's existing zoning to pursue a new emergency and inpatient care building along West 10th Avenue. This application was approved on consent earlier this morning. Finally, staff are assessing a VGH campus-wide rezoning application proposing long-term phased redevelopment to modernize and expand the hospital. This work is ongoing and would come forward in 2027.

The VGH campus policy statement, which in the form of a Broadway plan appendix, is a long-term vision for the campus to enable renewal, growth, and modernization of healthcare facilities. It aims to provide a clear and robust framework of planning principles and design parameters while maintaining flexibility for VGH. Direction includes departures from past policies, approvals, and obligations in recognition of current challenges and future needs. I will now provide an overview of the proposed policy direction, highlighting key elements.

STARTING WITH RECONCILIATION, WITH THE AIM TO FOSTER CULTURALLY SAFE AND WELCOMING ENVIRONMENTS THAT VISIBLY AND RESPECTFULLY REFLECTS LOCAL NATIONS' VALUES, HISTORIES, KNOWLEDGE, LANGUAGES AND ART, ENSURING THEIR PRESENCE AND PERSPECTIVES ARE EMBEDDED THROUGHOUT THE CAMPUS. KEY POLICY DIRECTION SEEKS OPPORTUNITIES TO COLLABORATE WITH LOCAL NATIONS ON CULTURAL VISIBILITY IN THE PUBLIC REALM AND OPEN SPACES. AS WELL, LOOKING FOR BUILDING DESIGN TO CONTRIBUTE TOWARDS CREATING CULTURALLY SAFE HEALTH CARE ENVIRONMENTS.

In terms of land use and density, the policy promotes a mix of land uses and development density that supports and expands on the site's core healthcare functions with appropriate flexibility for the site to adapt to evolving service needs. Key policy direction includes flexible mix of healthcare-related land uses appropriate for a campus environment and for density to be determined through zoning based on healthcare requirements and the ability to achieve high-quality built form, site design, and open space outcomes.

Policy includes direction on built form and site design to enable a coherent and high-performing health care environment that balances the complex functional requirements of a hospital campus with good urban design to improve the experience of patients, staff, visitors, and the broader community. Key policy direction includes accommodating large, efficient building forms for health care functionality while respecting protected public views and helicopter flight paths.

Clerk 12:14:33

Policies promote a high-quality design leading to a more legible, coherent, and accessible campus with a strengthened public realm and improved integration with surroundings.

One of the key areas of departure from past policies and approvals is for the approach to open space. Under existing approvals from the 2000s, the VGH campus is obligated to provide approximately nine acres of public open space, illustrated in the top right of this slide. Some portions of this concept have been implemented, including portions of an open space corridor along Willow Street, a plaza south of 12th Avenue. These examples are highlighted in the photos along the bottom. Space constraints on the campus and increased healthcare demands dictate a different approach with reduced open space requirements.

THE KEY POLICY DIRECTIONS INCLUDE LOOKING TO ESTABLISH A CONNECTED OPEN SPACE NETWORK WITH A SYSTEM OF LINEAR CORRIDORS AND NODES BRINGING STRUCTURE TO THE CAMPUS. RATHER THAN THE EXISTING NINE ACRES OF PERMANENT OPEN SPACE EXPECTATION, THE NEW POLICY WOULD TARGET FOUR ACRES OF PERMANENT OPEN SPACE THROUGH LINEAR AND NOTAL SPACES. AS WELL THE POLICY SETS A TARGET FOR 30% OF THE CAMPUS AS PUBLIC OPEN SPACE THROUGH A MIX OF PERMANENT AND INTERIM SPACES THAT EVOLVE THROUGH PHASE DEVELOPMENT. The interim spaces would consist of large sites cleared for redevelopment, which are to be put into public use on an interim basis.

The policy also looks to establish a continuous wellness walk circuit along streets and corridors linking buildings and open spaces.

Another area of departure from existing obligations is regarding the approach to heritage. Through past approvals, portions of the Heather Pavilion, a building on site, are municipally designated and protected through a heritage revitalization agreement. However, the building has not been used for patient care in over 20 years and is functionally obsolete for modern health care uses. Retrofitting it to meet contemporary standards would be complex, prohibitively expensive, and suboptimal compared to new purpose-built facilities. Recognizing these challenges, plus growing healthcare demands and campus space constraints, the Heather Pavilion is proposed for demolition.

In response, the proposed key policy directions look to establish a Heritage Conservation Management Plan to inform the future phased redevelopment of the VGH campus. This would enable consideration of interpretation as the primary conservation approach as an alternative to preservation and rehabilitation of the Heather Pavilion. The approach would include a review of existing heritage agreements, identifying modifications and council approvals needed for contemplated demolition. Proposed policy looks to advance substantive and meaningful strategies to commemorate the heritage value of the campus, including reuse of salvaged materials and heritage elements into new buildings and landscape. The VGH campus was presented to the City's Heritage Commission in March of this year, receiving support and principle for the redevelopment of the campus, subject to further work on conservation approaches for the Heather Pavilion.

Clerk 12:17:44

The VGH campus policy statement contains guidance on transportation, looking to strengthen connections to and through the campus, supporting diverse mobility needs unique to a health care environment. KEY POLICY DIRECTION AIMS TO IMPROVE SAFETY AND COMFORT FOR ALL ROAD USERS, REDUCE CONFLICTS AND SIMPLIFY VEHICLE MOVEMENTS AND SUPPORT EFFICIENT HOSPITAL OPERATIONS, ENHANCE WALKING, CYCLING AND ROLLING THROUGH ACTIVE TRAVEL LANES SUCH AS THE TENTH AVENUE GREENWAY, SUPPORT FOR WIDER SIDEWALKS AND HIGH QUALITY PUBLIC REALM. THE POLICY ALSO SUPPORTS CLEAR WAYFINDING STRATEGIES AND STRENGTHENING INTERNAL CAMPUS CONNECTIONS.

THE POLICY INCLUDES GUIDANCE RELATED TO SUSTAINABILITY AND RESILIENCE, TO PURSUE LOW CARBON DESIGN STRATEGIES AND VISIBLE GREEN ELEMENTS WHERE FEASIBLE, AND TO DESIGN BUILDINGS, INFRASTRUCTURE AND SYSTEMS TO MEET POST DISASTER STANDARDS TO MAINTAIN CONTINUOUS OPERATION AND CRITICAL SERVICES.

Redevelopment of the VGH campus is subject to development cost levies and where applicable amenity contributions. Regarding amenity contributions, large employment hubs such as hospital campuses do come with growth costs to serve new employees. Although not fully covering the cost of growth, city policy looks to secure a nominal contribution, typically in kind. The determination of public benefits is subject to the rezoning process. However, the policy direction points to an in-kind contribution, such as child care or flexible office spaces for nonprofits or health-related community uses as potential contributions. The policy also encourages a community benefits agreement to advance local employment inclusion and procurement.

Finally, the policy includes a flexible approach to phasing to meet expansion and modernization needs of the hospital over a 30-year time frame. Bases would include construction of new clinical health and support buildings and demolition of older buildings while maintaining operations. Sites cleared for future redevelopment are to be landscaped and programmed for public use in the interim.

THROUGH THE WORK BEING UNDERTAKEN ON THE VGH CAMPUS, STAFF HAVE ENGAGED WITH LOCAL NATIONS THROUGH MEETINGS AND WRITTEN UPDATES. WE'VE INCLUDED POLICY DIRECTION RELATED TO CULTURAL VISIBILITY AND CREATING SAFE HEALTH CARE SPACES. FURTHER DISCUSSION IS ANTICIPATED AS PART OF THE ONGOING CAMPUS WIDE RESONING PROCESS. Staff have also sought public input online via Shape Your City and through an in-person information session. Comments received in support noted support for the modernization and expansion of the hospital, addition of more hospital rooms, retention of green space, and provision of multimodal transportation options. Comments of concern noted impacts from the size of new buildings, concern over the proposed demolition of the Heather Pavilion, impacts on privacy for neighboring residential properties, and for VGH to adhere to previous agreements with the city. Staff considered this feedback as well as feedback from advisory boards in the policy development.

In conclusion, the two images here illustrate the VGH campus as it exists today on the left and a conceptual illustration of the potential cumulative change enabled through the policy on the right.

Clerk 12:20:47

THE POLICY, SORRY, THE HOSPITAL MODERNIZES AND EXPANDS SHIFTING FROM WEST TO EAST ON THE SITE CREATING A MODERN AND COHERENT CAMPUS WITH A NETWORK OF LINEAR AND OPEN SPACES AND A LARGE INTERIM PUBLIC SPACE WHICH FURTHER UNLOCKS THE CAMPUS AND ALLOWS FOR FLEXIBILITY TOWARDS MEETING FUTURE HEALTH CARE NEEDS.

THANK YOU. I WILL NOW HAND OVER TO REPRESENTATIVES FROM THE VANCOUVER COASTAL HEALTH AUTHORITY AND VANCOUVER GENERAL HOSPITAL FOR SOME REMARKS.

Thank you. Good morning, Mayor and Council. My name is Dr. Vinay Dhingra. I'm a critical care physician and senior medical director at Vancouver Acute, which includes Vancouver General Hospital. Thank you for your time. This is an exciting day for us at VGH, really. There are four individuals who will be speaking this morning to the VCH application before you. I'll be speaking about the clinical imperative. Fernando Pica will be speaking to you about business demands. Don Kazian will speak about phased redevelopment approach. And Addie Price will speak to you about the importance of reconciliation and culturally safe spaces. I've spent more than 30 years caring for people at VGH. My deepest commitment is to ensuring people continue to receive safe, seamless, quality care as their needs evolve. Every day, I see the extraordinary commitment of our healthcare teams, but I also see the growing pressures they are under. Annually, VGH care teams see more than 93,000 emergency visits, half a million outpatient visits, and perform more than 21,000 surgeries. These numbers have grown and will continue to grow. Our regional population is grown by 18% by as early as 2035, and those over the age of 70 who need more medical care by 47% in that same period. Every day, our teams are managing the effects of emergency department crowding, inpatient shortages, aging infrastructure, and infrastructure resulting in patients being seen and cared for in hallways, delayed admissions, longer waits, stress and strain on both families as well as healthcare providers.

Supporting our vision for the future of VGH campus, this policy statement supports the kind of healthcare environment Vancouver residents need. Modern emergency care, better inpatient environments, clearer way finding, improved access, more resilient infrastructure and spaces that support patients, families and our staff. Our proposed campus redevelopment allows us to continue providing care throughout construction without losing beds or interrupting clinical services. We recognize the historical role of the Heather Pavilion and we're committed to a conservation management plan to honor that heritage. The Heather Pavilion, as you heard, has not provided patient care for more than 20 years and cannot be retrofitted or adapted to meet today's clinical standards. The other legacy that we carry with us is that of providing outstanding patient care. It's fundamental to the culture of Vancouver General Hospital. The ability for future generations of doctors, nurses, researchers, and healthcare professionals to provision that in facilities designed for modern medicine is a clinical imperative. Looking ahead, this policy gives Vancouver Coastal Health the ability to responsibly plan the next generation of healthcare infrastructure while maintaining uninterrupted care throughout its redevelopment. Mayor and Council, on behalf of the healthcare professionals, patients, and families, and generations who will depend on this hospital in the future, we respectfully ask for your support. Thank you, and I'll pass it on to my colleague, Fernando Pica.

Thank you, Doctor. Good morning, Mayor, Council. My name's Fernando Pica. I'm a Chief Financial Officer for Vancouver Coastal Health and also VP of infrastructure. As you heard in the intro, you got a good summary of our VGH campus and our policy statement in front of you. What I'd like to do today is just for you, highlight a few of our, what we think are salient points for the policy statement for our campus.

First, our campus is large and really complex. Many of you know it, we drive it every day. On any given day, depending on our patient census, BGH is on the top three largest campus in our country. It's BC's largest hospital site and the one of only two adult trauma centers. As you've seen our chopper fly to and from our hospital, it is the destination of some of the most complex patients in our province and one of the city's largest employers. Second, many of our buildings are quite dated. In particular, our Heller Pavilion dates back to 1903. Today it occupies almost 40% of our campus. As our doctor said, hasn't seen a patient or had any meaningful clinical activity in over 20 years.

Most of our buildings on our campus do not meet census standards, sorry, seismic standards. And they struggle to deal with the new demands of extreme heat and cold and the power supply that we must draw on that campus. We are also in need of Buildings that can better withstand the effects of wildfire, of smoke, of heavier rainfall, and poor air quality. Third, our campus has limited space to grow. The campus is landlocked, making it near impossible for us to meaningfully expand. The reality is that VGH cannot grow without creating open space. The proposed policy statement that Council has will facilitate these conditions for us. Lastly, an expanded campus and all the activity that it will bring, must be safe for those that travel to and from it every day. We have been and will continue to be an avid supporter of cycling for the many thousands of employees that cycle to and from work. It is why we are requesting that Council support relocation of the West 10th Avenue bike lane to bi-directional lanes on the north side of the street. We're also requesting that the final configuration, including possible conversion of West 10th Avenue to one-way vehicle traffic, be assessed through the full campus rezoning process, with the goal of making West 10th safer for everyone. This will provide a much safer environment for cyclists, given the increased vehicle traffic we will have on that street, as ambulances, supply trucks, patient and staff vehicles on the south side of West 10th will travel. Thank you for your consideration. Pass this on to our Don Casian. Thank you.

Thanks, Fernando. Good morning, Mayor and Council. My name is Don Casian, Principal of Casian Architecture and Interior Design and Planning. Today, I ask you to look beyond a single building, beyond a single block of land, and consider what the Vancouver General Hospital campus must become over the next century. I'm going to speak about three things very briefly. One is designing a world-class hospital campus, creating exceptional public spaces, and ensuring there's enough land to redevelop the campus while it continues caring for patients. One of the biggest misconceptions is that a hospital campus should be planned like a university campus, with buildings separated by generous lawns and open space. Modern hospitals simply do not work that way. Across the world, Acute care hospitals are becoming larger, taller, and more integrated because their physical form is driven by medicine and not by conventional urban development patterns.

A quaternary acute care hospital functions as one interconnected system. And because healthcare today depends on highly integrated clinical services, modern hospitals require exceptionally large floor plates. We measure them at football fields. Our second phase and third phase of this project are the size of two, three, four, five football fields. Hospitals also need healing landscapes where patients, families, staff, and neighbors benefit from gardens, walking routes, sunlight, and places for reflection. The challenge is creating those spaces while keeping the clinical heart of the hospital connected. That is exactly what this policy achieves. It replaces the idea of one large, isolated open space with a connected network of healing gardens, wellness walks, public plazas, and green spaces that will evolve as the campus evolves.

Over the past several years, we carefully tested many redevelopment scenarios while ensuring that the hospital could remain fully operational throughout construction. One conclusion became unavoidable, that the Heather Pavilion site is the key that unlocks the orderly phased redevelopment of the campus. It provides the opportunity to construct the future replacement for the Blackmoor Pavilion while the existing hospital continues operating. In turn, that preserves the space required to eventually replace the Jim Pattison Pavilions and allows each subsequent phase of redevelopment to proceed without interrupting patient care. As was mentioned, the Heather Pavilion cannot meet the demands of modern health care. Its layout and billing systems are functionally obsolete. The structure and form are impossible to retrofit for modern health care delivery. And it remains vulnerable to seismic risk, resulting in a retrofit that would be prohibitively expensive while still delivering a compromise below standard facility. This does make it one of the most difficult decisions, but ultimately necessary decision, a planning decision before you. The building is an important part of Vancouver General Hospital's history, and it deserves to be commemorated. The policy commits to exactly that through a comprehensive conservation management plan and meaningful commemoration.

Mayor and Council, hospitals exist for one purpose, to care for people. Every generation before us has adapted this campus to meet the healthcare needs of its time. And today it's our responsibility to ensure Vancouver General Hospital can continue adapting to meet healthcare needs for the next 100 years. This policy does provide that planning framework to make that possible. Thank you. And I'll hand over to my colleague, Addie Price.

Good morning, Mayor and Council. First of all, I'd be remiss if I didn't thank you for your commitment to reconciliation, as was evidenced by your land acknowledgement this morning and the beautiful artwork you have throughout your building. My name is Addie Price. I'm the Vice President for Indigenous Health at Vancouver Coastal Health. The Vancouver General Hospital, as you know, is located on the traditional ancestral and unceded territories of the Musqueam, Squamish, and TTsleil-Waututh nations. As we plan the future of this campus, our responsibility extends beyond clinical capacity. We must also create a space where Indigenous patients, families, and communities feel respected, welcomed, and culturally safe. For too many Indigenous people, healthcare institutions have historically been associated with exclusion, discrimination, and trauma. At Vancouver Coastal Health, our responsibility is to acknowledge that history while creating spaces that better support healing for future generations. The physical environment matters. Buildings, public spaces, and the overall character of a campus all contribute to whether people feel safe seeking care. This redevelopment gives us an opportunity to create a healthcare environment that better reflects Indigenous values, supports healing, and strengthens relationships with the communities we serve. In that context, the Heather Pavilion deserves thoughtful consideration. While the building has historical significance, its institutional architectural expression also reinforces memories and experiences that some indigenous people associate with historical trauma at residential schools, my family included. Our responsibility is to acknowledge that history while creating spaces that better support healing for future generations. This policy provides the opportunity to respectfully commemorate the past, while creating a campus that reflects today's values of inclusion, reconciliation, and culturally safe care.

Thank you.

Thanks, Mayor. And thank you for the presentations and updates. I principally have two questions. One is around the Heather Pavilion and appreciating the comments that hasn't been used for medical care for many years and the challenges of retrofit to bring it up. I'm just curious if there was any exploration of and recognizing the prohibitive nature of this in terms of financing is the retrofitting, but also building around it as we've seen with some other heritage structures in the city. We've got some number of examples downtown where we've been able to maintain a site, a building, and then build above and around. I'm just curious if that was contemplated or if you could just comment on that given the nature and the interest in the Heather Pavilion.

probably every possible option on the planet, including that one. And we tried different ways to move around it, with it, incorporate it. The first big issue was we need a couple thousand stall parkade underground. because we're very short of parking. And then when you realize the... So we can't go under it. When you realize the floor plates of modern health care are just jammed with technology that needs to change with big high ceiling heights to get service, all of this equipment, and then the changes that happen on an annual basis to move these facilities around inside... It's really, it just didn't work, basically.

Okay. The report mentioned in the presentation around commemorative efforts, and so what does that look like in a more tangible way if there's no way to preserve the building in any fashion or parts of the building?

There's quite a range of possibilities. St. Paul's Hospital, for example, has taken parts of some of their old buildings. Probably not to the extent that we will, but we can use portions of the building. because the granite is granite. It is stable. It just needs to be taken apart and reconstructed, as well as in the landscape. There's lots of ways to incorporate the building in the landscape, the towers, the granite. There's a great piece of signage across the entry of the Heather Pavilion that would be great to preserve as well. We're thinking inside the building or outside the new buildings that happen. But those are all, the next couple of months we'll be studying those possibilities. And actually we're pretty excited about it.

Okay, thank you. I know others may have questions on that, but I just want to move to another question.

VGH referenced the interest around the 10th Avenue bikeway, particularly having a bi-directional route on the north side of the street and also one-way traffic. I'm just curious, what kind of conversations have happened, and staff can obviously comment as well, is like what kind of conversations have happened around that? It is a very busy area, having walked it and ridden it and I'm thinking with all the paramedic vehicles and so on and so could you comment on is that something that you need direction on today or is that something that will be contemplated as this evolves in the first phases?

WE HAVE HAD A NUMBER OF DISCUSSIONS AND WE WOULD ANTICIPATE HAVING ONGOING DISCUSSIONS WITH THE APPLICANT TEAM. I THINK HAVING TENTH AVENUE FUNCTION SAFELY AND FUNCTIONALLY IS THE CORE GOAL BOTH FOR VGH AND THE CITY. BEYOND THAT, WHETHER WE REQUIRE EXPLICIT DIRECTION IN SUPPORT OF ANY ONGOING DISCUSSION, WE INTEND TO DO SO AND WE'VE SIGNALLED THAT IN OUR REPORT TO DATE. Okay, so it sounds like this is an active conversation recognizing holistically we want this to be a safe place for whether it be visitors, patients, cyclists, pedestrians, and so you'll be continuing that. It doesn't sound like you need directions specifically, but this is going to be an ongoing conversation. That's our intention from a staff team. And there would be a report back to council as this progresses? Because I know it's a very long-term project. Yes, it would come forward with the rezoning, the campus-wide rezoning, which is an active application, which would be the next piece that would come forward in 2027. Okay. I'll leave it there because others have questions. Thank you.

Thank you, Councillor Meiszner.

Yeah, thanks. And thanks for being here. I actually had two similar questions, so maybe I'll just follow up for a bit more clarity on both of those. And I'll start with the 10th Avenue bike lane as well. Was there ever consideration of moving the location of the emergency room exit or entrance for the new emergency room to West 12th, for example, or a different street to reduce conflicts with that bike lane?

In the future future, once the Jim Patterson building comes down and gets reconstructed, emergency will come off at 12th. Okay. So, but that's... That'll be 20, 30 years from now. In the meantime, we're going to be adding a couple thousand cars onto 10th and Heather and 12th. And so there's lots of activity. Along 10th, we have many curb cuts to access arcades, as well as loading and supply chain stuff. So there's going to be a lot of activity. And during construction, we'll likely have to even move those bike lanes to the north side of the street anyways, because there's going to be lots of construction trucks for many, many years along 10th Avenue.

Okay. Thank you for that. Just to follow up on that, can I ask staff if that will be viable or possible to move that existing, I guess, unidirectional bike lane on each side of the street to the north side? of 10th during the construction. Is that the plan that we're contemplating or anticipating?

Clerk 12:39:44

Why don't I take that? Paul Storer, Director of Transportation. Yeah, thanks for the question. We haven't worked through construction phasing yet. There are different options with construction to look at how you, you know, build up so you construct the site, but we know it is going to be a difficult one to build off of the 10th Avenue bikeway. You know, 10th Avenue is a super complex corridor. It took us many, many years of conversation with the hospital and persons with disabilities and the other institutions along the corridor to land on the current design. So we're going to need to look at it really closely, both in terms of what we do in terms of facilities over the longer term, but also in terms of that construction phasing and impacts.

Okay. And do you know offhand how much that cost? Because that was a fairly recent project, the bike lane.

Clerk 12:40:32

Yeah, so the current lanes were, I think, about 10 million total, a little bit more. If we looked at doing that work now, you know, construction costs have gone way up. It might be double that or something like that. Okay, thank you.

Appreciate that, Paul. For the applicant, I understand, obviously, from your perspective, there is conflict existing there currently, and that will increase with this new development. Are you proposing to make any sort of contribution financially in order to help relocate that bike lane that was recently constructed to the north side of 10th, for example? Is that part of your plan or proposal?

Yes, it is.

To make a financial contribution towards that?

Correct.

Okay. And are you able to share what you're proposing?

In terms of financial contribution? Yes. Well, the cost isn't figured out yet. This will all be in the spirit of major construction going on and major budgets to do that. And safety is critical here.

Okay, that's good to know that you're open to that.

I'm Shelley Fleck. I'm also representing Vancouver General Hospital in this file. I would like to add that we have consulted with EHS, VPD, our internal stakeholders, our emergency department. you know, users of the facility as well when it comes to the 10th Avenue bike lane and really have received some feedback what would work and what would not work. As a piece of this work, we also consulted with Lunt, who is a local transportation company here in Vancouver. We worked with them on what the possibilities might be to revise the 10th Avenue bike lane and then also the one-way or two-way traffic along there as well. So we are looking for some direction today from Council. to continue this conversation formally as we work over the next six months for the final rezoning obligation document that's gonna come before you in early 2027. We understand that it is a conversation and it is something we have to work through with Paul and Kent and our city colleagues, but it is something that we really do want the opportunity to have some earnest conversation around. We will also consult with cycling community as well. As Fernando indicated, we have an active cycling community at Vancouver Coastal. We are going to continue to support cycling. We will engage with our community.

I'm sorry to interrupt, but just to be clear, you want direction today?

Yes, we do.

On the bike lane. Thank you.

Thank you. Councillor Zhou.

Yeah, thanks, Mayor. Thanks to our city staff and also Vancouver Coastal Health for all the work for this project. I think it's arguably, not arguably, I think it's the most important healthcare expansion project in the province in the next 10 years. So my question is about the capacity for the new hospital. So I've been involved in many... hospital redesign, a redevelopment project, BC Children's Hospital, my previous career at Fraser Health for the Cedar Memorial and also Opsford Regional Hospital. I think one of the challenges, when we build a hospital, we realize we should build bigger. There's not enough capacity. So my question first to our staff is, does this policy provide Vancouver Coast Health with enough flexibility in responding to the changing healthcare needs, technology, and population growth?

Clerk 12:44:05

Thank you for the question, Ken McDougall, Special Projects Office. I would say that we believe that it does. The intention of the policy statement is to provide some guidance and guardrails specifically around elements of public realm, safety on 10th Avenue and other streets, around direction for heritage, how to continue that conversation, open space. But outside of those pieces, I think we're intending to have large tracts of land available for the hospital that can be flexible and meet their needs.

Okay, so for instance, if in 10 years, we say you want to further expand the hospital, building a higher building or bigger building, does that policy provide that flexibility?

Clerk 12:44:44

The policy provides that flexibility, yes. And we intend to carry that forward into rezoning as well.

Okay, so I'll ask the same question to my Coastal Health team. Do you think this policy provides you that flexibility in terms of meeting the demand, the growing demand in the future?

Yes, it will.

Thank you. Good. The other question is about the child care space. So that's another challenge facing by the hospital operations. A lot of frontline nurses, doctors, they cannot find the child care space. I know it's briefly mentioned in this document, but it didn't mention how many more child care space it will create. Do you have any idea about child care?

Clerk 12:45:23

IN TERMS OF THE PUBLIC BENEFITS AND COMMUNITY CONTRIBUTIONS WHICH WOULD BE DRIVING THE CHILDCARE CONTRIBUTIONS FROM THE CITY PERSPECTIVE, WE DON'T HAVE A FINAL NUMBER. THE POLICY PROVIDES DIRECTION OF WHAT TO LOOK FOR. WE THINK CHILDCARE WOULD BE A GOOD PRIORITY, A GOOD THING TO LAND ON A HEALTHCARE CAMPUS SUCH AS THIS. BUT OFFICE SPACES ARE ALSO COULD BE CONSIDERED. PERHAPS VGH, I DON'T KNOW IF THERE'S ANYTHING TO ADD TO THAT.

No, to answer your question, no, we don't have a number. That is something that we would take under advisement as we're planning each building and starting to develop the campus. Child care, as you indicated, is very important to us as well. We have staff that work 24-7 and we are looking for a new model of child care that can provide that. spaces 24-7 as well, but that will be worked out as each building is developed.

Okay, including 24-7's childcare space as well.

That is something that we would want to pursue to see if it's something we could see happen.

Okay, great. Thank you. So the other question is about, I know the Oak Ridge, Oak VGH Station, Skytrain Station will be opening very soon. So I know this will improve the walking, cycling, transit access, also the emergency vehicle moment. But there are patients and visitors, they rely on driving to the campus. It's very important for people with mobility issues. How can we make sure that people rely on cars have reliable access to the campus?

That's all part of the planning that we've done with the buildings and the landscapes and the site work. It's a critical part of design, and so it will be incorporated.

Clerk 12:47:05

Yeah. Okay. Any things on planning? Yeah. Special projects office. We've heard through our processes that definitely driving, particularly those in moments of crisis or needing health care services, that's one of the primary ways that they would access the hospital. So it is one of the focuses. OF THE CAMPUS ULTIMATELY SUPPORTING ALL MODES OF TRANSIT BUT ACKNOWLEDGING THAT VEHICLE TRAFFIC WOULD BE A COMPONENT TO THIS. I THINK IN THE NEW BUILDING THEY'RE INTENDING AND PLANNING FOR UNDERGROUND PARKING TO COME ONLINE AS WELL AS THE PARK AID ON 12th AVENUE WHICH REMAINS IN PLACE FOR SOME TIME WHICH CURRENTLY PROVIDES OVER 2000 PARKING SPACES. SO IT'S ONE OF THE CHALLENGES ON THE SITE THAT WE'RE COGNIZANT OF AND CONTINUE TO WORK ON.

Okay, so my last very quick procedure questions. So this plan does not make sure that, I mean, for the future redevelopment project, we still need to approve on a case-by-case basis, right? Approve this plan does not guarantee we approve every single project in the future. Is that right?

Clerk 12:48:05

Correct. This is the policy framework that informs where we intend to go from a rezoning perspective, but ultimately in 2027, the work on a campus-wide rezoning, which would come back with the specific land use, the density, and other provisions would be included at that time. Thanks.

Councillor Bligh.

Thanks very much. Just a follow-up question to staff in terms of the reference to a wellness walk. Could you just share a little bit more about what that meant as one of the policy statements?

Clerk 12:48:39

Sure. It is a conceptual idea that's put in place. When we think of the hospital as a campus, to use an example, if people are familiar along 12th near Oak, there is an enhanced setback with an extra row of trees that currently exist there. If features like that were to be extended around the campus and connect and link through plazas and other things, that those features would accumulate into a wellness walk. as a key feature around the hospital, but we haven't pinned down specific details of exactly where just promoting the aspiration to work towards that.

Yeah. Okay. No, I really appreciate that. And given it's a hospital, of course, wellness walk is makes sense in that context. Um, And maybe to the applicant then, how does it extend to connecting, allowing connection between communities given the proximity to the rapid transit line on Broadway there and the hospital's sort of footprint is so, in the grand scheme of the plan, whether it's in the next few years or in 20 years, I have a keen interest in pedestrianizing this redevelopment vision to make sure that people see it as that public amenity that allows them to access a high rapid transit corridor like we are building on Broadway. So your sort of high-level vision of how you see that coming to fruition would be really helpful.

Wellness Walk and other pedestrian walkways and areas are really about the people feeling really great as they move through the spaces. And so, yes, there's linearity to the pathways, but there's also landscaping, and there's pockets of landscaping, and there's places to sit or to... step aside and look at something, look at something commemorating the Hilla Pavilion, for example, or another place to sit in the sun and just relax and chill after hearing some bad news or good news. And so basically be animated all the way, not just a bunch of row of trees and away we go, but it has to be animated so that people feel something along the way and feel good about it.

Yeah, and to be very clear, just given the configuration of the roads and streets in and around the hospital, my real interest is actually that it's seen as a bit of a cut through, if you will, than sort of walking along the sidewalk to the intersection and down that prevents pedestrianization rolling and walking. So not for necessarily patients or people accessing the hospital, but for people who see that it's been designed with pedestrianization in mind.

Well, the pathway will be clear, and there's lots of space for that for people. If you're busy and you just want to go straight through, then you're going straight through. Yeah, okay. You have the option to pull aside and linger. Yeah. But it's definitely a go.

Okay, I see someone else, and I do have one more question, so if you can be brief.

I just might add one little comment to that. You know, having worked there for a long time, I see lots of patients, families, but also staff in very intense times. And actually having areas like this to be able to get a breather, walk through, it is so healing, whether it's been a crisis that you've just heard or others. But for staff as well, it's very important.

Yeah, no, I appreciate that. That's a really important additional piece of context. Thank you. So on the bike lane, just to switch gears for a quick second, because it has been talked about in terms of moving it to the other side of the street. I've also heard mention of potentially additional traffic lights where there are now four-way stops. But one of the things I... haven't heard is what has the engagement been like with the medical facilities on the other side of tent? Because there are also, you know, skin cancer clinics, BC Cancer Agency that A lot of, every single one of those buildings has a parkade. There's many people coming and going every day. So I'm just wanting to make sure we're having the question asked here. Are we just going to potentially move the problem to the other side of the street and have someone else deal with it? Have we talked to them? Let's make sure we don't have this conversation in a vacuum. Any comments you have? I have about 30 seconds.

Just a quick comment about that is what we really want to do today is get into setting a goal for with transportation planning that during the coming months, we actually study the entire situation for the future, not just today. and talk to all the stakeholders and involve everybody that's required and do a thorough analysis and study of everything. Okay, but it hasn't been done yet. We've done a lot of it. We have talked to people across the street. We've talked to many people, but we need a goal here is what we're looking for.

Okay, that's my time.

We're at time. And so can we get a motion to extend this meeting until to hear final council questions? Councillor Klassen, seconded. Councillor Meiszner, council, is there any discussion? Great. All those in favour say yay. All those opposed say nay. Sorry, clerk, should I make this announcement now or after? Okay, thank you. Okay, great. Councillor Klassen.

Thanks very much. And first of all, I'll just start off by congratulating members of the foundation, physicians, and all the partners involved in this. I think there's been an incredible amount of work to get to this place, and so I'm very much looking forward to seeing the work advance. Don, you made a comment. about the campus development design being driven by medicine. And I want to sort of take issue with that comment because largely I've seen hospitals with their gigantic HVAC systems and ducting and what have you start to look like oil refineries rather than actually sort of great buildings. And so I wanted to just sort of talk to you a little bit about some of the things that can be done to try and make sure that this becomes a long-term, like this is going to be a building that's going to be around for 50 years. And it's a very important central part of our neighborhood. So I'm kind of curious to know how you intend to make this a beautiful part as much as a high-functioning part of our city.

Fortunately, we do more than just hospitals in our practice across the country in the Middle East. And so our objective is to take the functionality, because basically health care is inside-out design. But the architecture around it, et cetera, can be whatever it needs to be, to be inspiring, to reflect VGH's values, the city's values. and to address the goals. So it can be anything we want it to be. It's not designed yet, but there's no reason it needs to be a machine with oil refinery stuff sticking out.

Yeah, it becomes sort of less about being how many stories or how many beds, but about what the experience is around the building. I'm curious as to how you can... Our aging demographic is something that we have to live with right now and understand, and over at least the next 25 years, we're going to see that age advancing. So how is this campus going to respond to the need for being age-friendly? Being which friendly? Being age-friendly.

Yeah, so maybe I'll take that one. So what we are going to do in our design of new buildings is we will look to design them to be elder-friendly. There's a lot of best practice designs that really speak to creating spaces that are safe and healing for our geriatric population as well, knowing that, you know, we are a very busy campus, as you heard. We are going to create universal spaces. So if we get... more elderly people in a day than we accounted for in design, they can always go into another room that's equally designed the same way. So our approach to designing new buildings is going to be about universality and adaptability, and we will create design features that are elder-friendly in either the materials we use, the lighting we use, the colors we use, et cetera, and really look towards Don and his team to support us in that as we work with our stakeholders on that as well. I wanna talk about one fact that we are actually doing right now. is the emergency department. There's a way to certify for geriatric emergency sections of it. So we've actually got a clinical team that's doing that as we speak because that's very important.

Thanks very much. I am surprised with the kind of urgency that the Heather Pavilion components are being sort of dispensed with. Knowing fine architecture can sometimes incorporate. You have office space. You're going to need places to dine. or cafe to recreate people who are not going to be in their hospital rooms or the beds all the time. They want to meet with family members. The granite exterior of that building has something that's very sort of native to our region, and it also does give that life to it. So I'm just curious, is there not been even a portion of the building or something that could represent something very exciting on that sort of north side of the campus?

We would have to move it. Because the unfortunate part, the Headland Pavilion is right in the middle of the future. And as I said, we have big floor plates that need to sit on top of that site.

So just for time, Don, I heard you before respond to that about potentially taking some of the aspect of it. I just want to mention, because councillors always ask questions about child care, I know that... The 13th and William is the, we move forward with the idea of a 24-7 child care there. I remember getting excited response from members of the BCNU when we saw them at an event not long after. So clearly this is an area that we've done some actually really good work between that developer and VGH to try and make that happen. So that's exciting. I'm out of time. So thanks very much.

Thank you, Councillor Klassen. Councillor Frye.

Yeah, thank you. Great presentation, and thank you for all the work that you've been doing collectively. I want to just touch a little bit on the engagement. We talked about how a lot of the patients will be arriving by car, but I imagine a lot of patients will be arriving by subway soon enough once that's built. And I'm curious, lots of mentions of the Oak Street VGH station. I guess that's going to be the name, Oak VGH. And how folks are going to access. I know that there's mention here of like pedestrian ways along Laurel and Willow, both of which have more of an elevation gain. And I'm thinking about patients who may be less ambulatory, but, you know, still taking the train. How do we anticipate connecting folks from the SkyTrain to the hospital, especially if they have mobility challenges?

Thanks for the question. Kent McDougall, Special Projects Office. We don't have it in any detail. It is something we're aware of and putting forward in the policy is the potential of a tunnel connection. But that's more than just the Vancouver Coastal Health VGH itself as a landowner to make that connection. So it would involve other sites between the station. as well, potentially. So it's something we would continue to explore as an idea.

But I am correct in that Willow and Laurel are both more elevation game, and those are the streets that are identified for pedestrian, but they also have the most elevation relative to, say, Oak Street. Correct. They are uphill. Okay. But we're still going to prioritize the pedestrian... INTERFACE ON LAUREL AND WILLOW?

LAUREL AND WILLOW WITH THE GENERAL ALIGNMENTS OF THOSE STREETS AND STILL LEAVING LARGE CONTINGUOUS PARCELS AVAILABLE FOR HOSPITAL REDEVELOPMENT IS THE PATH PROPOSED IN THE POLICY. I THINK WE WOULD LOOK TO IMPROVE CONNECTIONS TO TRANSIT IN ANY WAY WE COULD, WHETHER THROUGH AN UNDERGROUND TUNNEL OR OTHER MEANS.

And I would love to replicate Councillor Bligh's shifting gears conversation around cycling. Do we anticipate that this might actually look to expanding cycling network maybe down the hill on Broadway to anticipate the kind of issues we're contemplating along 10th?

Great, thank you. Yeah, so we have direction from council to continue to plan for a future with bike lanes on Broadway. That wouldn't, like in terms of our analysis, that wouldn't replace the need for 10th Avenue. 10th Avenue has been a longstanding corridor even before it was a bikeway that was well used by people cycling. So what Broadway would do would be to provide an additional corridor for cycling and better access to the businesses and Broadway subway and things like that.

And now turning over a leaf to talk about pops and parks. Sorry, this is a bad pun. And I appreciate that some of the charm of VGH is the access to green space and the wellness. And how does the management of these public open spaces work? Is this going to be entirely the responsibility of Vancouver General Hospital? Or is it a mix of park board? How do we anticipate some of this will play out?

Thanks for the question. Ken McDougall, Special Projects Office. That is a good question. It's a topic of discussion that I think we're continuing to have, exactly how the mechanics, how these would be secured, how they are managed. VGH does have a desire to maintain ownership of many of these spaces, particularly the large interim spaces proposed, which allow for future redevelopment. in another generation, if you will. It allows a fallow field approach where they could contemplate what that next phase looks like into the future. So it is that next step of the conversation, I think, for us that would come forward with the rezoning application in 2027 would be details about how these spaces, their management, and how that would work.

And any tree canopy, of course, would remain park board, that kind of maintenance as far as public trees? Correct. Yes. Okay. Great.

Thank you. Thank you.

Thanks very much. Councillor Orr.

Thanks, yeah. Counselor Klassen asked a few of my questions around the pavilion. I know we've had conversations around this, but I think in terms of a way to balance kind of memorializing the heritage aspect of the pavilion with, of course, the traumatic experiences of our First Nations and a way to do that sort of in a kind of a sensitive way I think I mentioned sort of how the woodlands development kind of preserved a part of the building materials, actually the granite, and used that granite as a sort of a marker. I was wondering what kind of approaches that you've explored around finding that balance.

We've started exploring. The detailed work is going to be done this fall prior to the actual rezoning in the new year. So a few more months of work to do.

But is that something that you're going to sort of explore, like keeping some of the materials and the character without sort of, you know, relitigating that past?

Yeah, absolutely. And there's lots of great examples around the country, the continent. And so we're going to be exploring that with VGH and with our our partners at the city as well.

Okay, thanks. And then following on from Councillor Fry's talk around transportation and that connection, I know I imagine that the connection would be you'd have to look at other properties, but also funding, I would imagine, would come from, would that be TransLink? Would that be private funding to build that tunnel?

Yeah, thanks for the question. Like, conceptually, it's a difficult connection to make from the hospital to the station at Laurel and Broadway, just given the grades for people with mobility issues. So, like, conceptually, it's an idea we want to continue to explore and then look at how we might be able to connect that in with future hospital development and with the SkyTrain station, where funding would come from that's, you know, still very much available.

While I have you up, obviously we have the new SkyTrain and obviously we also have 24-7 bus service east-west on Broadway. What about north-south, like 24-7 bus service on Oak? Has that been contemplated by the city and TransLink?

Yeah, in TransLink's Access for Everyone plan, they do locate expanding the night bus system to try to hit more of the region, connect people, particularly people who have off-hours jobs, to be able to kind of come and go. Somewhere like the hospital is really important for people to access kind of off-hours. So we continue to talk to TransLink about that.

Great, thank you.

Councillor Malooney.

Thanks very much. My questions are for the Director of Transport. Can you run us through what the significance is of 10th Avenue for cyclists and what alternative routes there are for cyclists?

Yeah, so 10th Avenue is one of our busiest bikeways within the city. It's kind of our major east-west connection through the center of the city. It connects in major employment centers with a lot of the rest of the city. So VGH itself and the City Hall Precinct. Central Broadway is just one of our biggest employment centers. So it really is a... critical routes and we saw that again even before it was a bikeway we saw a lot of people cycling on 10th avenue so we as part of the 10th avenue bikeway we are also trying to we agreed that we would be also trying to improve parallel corridors so 14th avenue we implemented the first phase of it at a similar time are going to continue to expand that out planning for bike lanes on broadway off Broadway routes, planning for improvements there. But just in terms of 10th Avenue, there's a lot of demand that the corridor serves really well.

And can you run us through what consultation was undertaken in settling on the current configuration?

Yes, we had a multi-phase engagement process, kind of three phases plus an additional phase where we hired an independent consultant to work with us and the Hospital of Vancouver Coastal Health and BC Cancer to kind of work through all of those issues. There are a ton of issues along the corridor, including, you know, obviously emergency access and loading on the corridor and cycling through the corridor on people with disabilities, mobility impairments. travelling across 10th Avenue. So it was a lot of engagement to land on the concept that's in place right now. So if we're considering something different, we'd also want to consider how we engage the various communities who would have an interest in this.

Okay. And obviously safety considerations are paramount when reconfiguring transport routes. Council, doesn't conventionally provide specific direction on the design of cycling infrastructure, do we?

Not typically. Sometimes we will bring really tricky challenges to council. So a really important facility like a recent one would be Granville Connector where there were a lot of different options about how we could move forward with a lot of different trade-offs and interests. But, yeah, quite often we implement it based on council policy.

All right. And just perhaps remind me, so the cost of that, the current configuration, was it $20 million?

It was about $10 million, more or less.

And then you said it would probably be...

Just ballpark, like we haven't done any design, but construction costs have gone up and we'd be having to essentially move the whole roadway over. There would be more tree impacts, you know, different impacts in terms of access to driveways and other streets and things. So there'd be a lot of work that we'd need to do to even get a really good ballpark of what the cost would be. But I expect it would be more than what we spent already, probably significantly more.

And who would be responsible for that expenditure?

Yeah, I think that's a question we'd want to continue to talk to the hospital about. If we see an option that would improve safety on the corridor for everyone, we'd want to talk to them about that. We've seen a big safety improvement since we implemented the bike lanes. We saw transportation injuries drop by about 60% along the corridor, which was a great outcome. So in terms of city funding, unless we saw something that would dramatically reduce collisions, like I would struggle to invest a lot of city funding into a reconfiguration of 10th Avenue.

Okay, and perhaps my next question is for planning. Can you remind me of what the amenity contributions that are likely to come out of the redevelopment of VCH?

Sure, Ken McTugall, Special Projects Office. We're still very much dealing with the plan and not the rezoning, so this is probably a very high-level estimate, but based on the floor area proposed, it's in the $7 million to $9 million from a CAC, which for facilities like this, we pursue a nominal rate. There are high rates for residential developments that you would see. So it's in that range that we would estimate at this point, and it would come forward with the rezoning.

Sorry. And that would be dealt with during the design?

Correct.

Right. That suits me. Thanks very much. Councillor Kirby Young.

Yeah, thanks. I have one question following up on that. And previous councils, I believe it was two councils ago if I'm correct, had a fairly, I think, vigorous debate with respects to the bike lane changes at that time. Did VCH have a position on that at that point? My question is to VCH.

BCH was involved in the original plan that was subsequently implemented. We got to a point where we could negotiate some of the things that were important to us. It was clear at the time that the bike lane was going in. There was no ability to push back on that it was going to be unidirectional. And I think one of the things we would like to point out, we are not asking that the bike lane move off of 10th completely. We understand. It's a busy bike thoroughfare. We simply want it moved off the south side of 10th where we have two entrances into Emerge. We have two loading docks. We have a very busy street coming off of Laurel that separates the Diamond Centre and the Research Pavilion with the Jim Pattison Pavilion. It's just a very busy avenue for bikes. And so what we're asking is that the south side bike lane be moved, and we moved to a bi-directional bike lane on 10th Avenue. What we landed up doing, getting back to your initial question, is when we did agree on the design that went in there, one of the things VGH was able to negotiate was more drop-off spaces in front of the eye care centre and more drop-off spaces around the corner from the eye care centre. We were able to get some additional short-term parking along 10th Avenue because, as we've talked previously, we have a lot of patients that are not going to take transit. They are not going to take their bike. They are going to drive. Dropping patients off in the emergency department, if I'm bringing someone there, I'm going to drop them off. Then I have to go find someplace to park because there isn't long-term parking there. So it's just a very busy, busy roadway. begin with and a busy cycling roadway so we just feel strongly that we need the south side bike lane moved to the north and we are willing to do the work that we have to do with our city colleagues to come up with the safest plan possible and we will engage the stakeholders Okay, so globally, we're probably, it's extremely rare to have a bike lane in front of an ambulance entrance. I think we're one of the only hospitals in the world, maybe a couple others, but we did a search. But it's very, very unusual to have bike lanes right in front of ambulances trying to come into hospitals.

I would imagine, so just reflecting back, you are wanting to have this discussion, and tell me if I'm phrasing this correctly, not just from a safety perspective, but also for patient care, given the nature of what people are attending the various facilities for, correct?

Correct. And one of the things I think is a challenge for us is we aren't able to produce the data to show that it actually is still a dangerous bike lane. We had one of our senior VGH employees actually hit a cyclist. We had an ambulance three weeks ago where a cyclist ran into an ambulance coming out of the emergency department. So we just feel there's a safer option for the 10th Avenue bike lane. That's what we're asking.

Thank you. I appreciate this perspective. Thank you. Thank you. Counselor Orr.

Thanks. Just following on that discussion with my remaining time, are my bidirectional bike lanes generally more safe?

so typically we don't like to install bi-directional bike lanes on two-way streets the added conflicts that that creates tend to make them less safe we've seen that where we have done it so it is one of the things that we'd want to consider continue to talk about if we did look at bi-directional bike lane typically those can work well on a one-way street. Kind of regardless of where the bike lanes are on 10th Avenue, there's going to be a lot of vehicles crossing over those bike lanes and a lot of pedestrians crossing over those bike lanes. So whether they're crossing from, kind of coming from Broadway, crossing the bike lanes or turning off of 10th Avenue onto one of those streets, we would want to be sure that what we landed on was overall at least as safe as what's out there. So that's what we'd want to look at.

And in terms of liability, if there is a sort of a council direction around the bike lanes, what sort of legal opinions have either the city or VGH sort of explored?

Well, I guess council...

Council has the ability to make decisions like this from a policy perspective. So I don't know. I wouldn't expect there to be a significant liability issue if we're acting in good faith. Okay. And with 30 seconds left, have you explored the liability of that?

We have not. We are looking for the opportunity to work with the city on what a safer option might be, at which time we will do full due diligence on that component as well.

Clerk 13:16:34

Thank you.

Okay, thank you, Councillor. Okay, that concludes our questions. So just a couple of items before we adjourn, or not adjourn, rather recess until three o'clock when we will hear from speakers and then have a final debate and decision on this item. Staff have advised that report number nine, 122 East Hastings Liquor License Amendment, Permanent hour change is no longer required and will be withdrawn from today's agenda. The report is no longer required at the request of the license holder. So we will, again, recess council until 3 p.m. and we will start in camera at 1.15 p.m.

Clerk 13:17:27

Thanks very much.

The meeting is in recess.

Clerk 13:34:29

Thank you.

The meeting is in recess.

Thank you.

Clerk 13:50:50

The meeting is in recess.

The meeting is in recess.

Thank you.

The meeting is in recess.

Clerk 14:35:57

The meeting is in recess.

Thank you.

Clerk 14:50:59

The meeting is in recess.

The meeting is in recess.

Thank you.

The meeting is in recess.

Clerk 15:36:06

The meeting is in recess.

Thank you.

The meeting is in recess.

Welcome to TELUS conferencing. Hello, Tamara. Can you hear me?

Yes, I can hear you. Can you hear me? Echo, echo, Charlie. I can hear you. Thank you. Okay, perfect. Okay.

Welcome back, everyone. So we are on item two again, and we will now hear from registered speakers for this report. So public speakers should state whether they support or oppose the recommendations and may only speak once. I will ask, I'll also ask speakers if they are residents of Vancouver, if it's not so noted on the speakers list. So our first public speaker is Andrea. Thank you.

Good afternoon Mayor and Council. My name is Andrea Bizayon and I'm an operations director at Vancouver General Hospital and a registered nurse by background. I am not a resident of Vancouver. Thank you for the opportunity to speak to the Vancouver General Hospital campus rezoning plans from the lands of the Coast Salish people, the Musqueam, Squamish, and TTsleil-Waututh nations. As a longstanding employee of Vancouver General Hospital, I'd like to express my strong support for this application and the future vision it sets out for the campus. The proposed rezoning is essential to supporting the continued advancement of patient care through innovation, modernization, and the ability to recruit and retain highly skilled and diverse health care workforce. As health care delivery continues to evolve, it's critical that the physical environment of our hospital campus enables us to deliver safe, contemporary, and culturally responsive care for the communities we serve. I'm aware that some members of the community have advocated for the preservation of the Heather Pavilion due to its historical significance and its role in education and learning. As a graduate of the Vancouver General Hospital School of Nursing class of February 1987, I have deep personal and professional connections to the campus and completed many clinical rotations within the Heather Pavilion, including D8-9, A5, C5, and others. However, I can say with confidence that my most meaningful learning experiences were not defined by the building itself. They were shaped by the mentors who guided me, the teachers who challenged me, and more importantly, the patients and families who entrusted me with their care. It's these human connections rather than the bricks and mortar that form the true legacy of learning at BGH. As I continue my own journey in reconciliation, I believe it's important to thoroughly consider what our physical spaces represent. In this context, I support the removal of outdated infrastructure and the opportunity to replace it with facilities that more clearly acknowledge the complex histories of healthcare delivery, including the experiences of our Indigenous patients. New development should intentionally support Indigenous-led culturally safe and culturally responsive models of care while also advancing medical excellence and innovation. Replacing aging structures with purpose-built facilities that reflect these values is an important step towards reconciliation and towards creating a healthcare environment that's inclusive, respectful, and forward-thinking. Thank you again for the opportunity to provide input to this important initiative and for considering the perspectives of those that have dedicated their career to serving patients and the broader community at Vancouver General Hospital. Thank you.

Clerk 16:03:42

Thank you very much. Our next speaker is speaker number two, Philip Sweeney.

Good morning, Mayor and Councillors. My name is Philip Sweeney. I am a resident of Vancouver. I am also an Operations Director for GF Strong and Ambulatory Care at VGH, working for Vancouver Coastal Health. Thank you for the opportunity to speak to the Vancouver General Hospital's campus rezoning plan and the lands of the Coast Salish peoples, the Musqueam, Squamish, and TTsleil-Waututh nations. As a longstanding employee of VGH, I would like to express my strong support for this application and for the future vision it sets out for the campus. I also believe that the proposed rezoning is essential for the ongoing advancement of patient care, allowing us to continue to innovate and modernize our services for decades to come. This work will further support our ability to recruit and retain our ever-growing, highly skilled, diverse healthcare team. It is crucial that the physical environment of our hospital campus facilitates public safety externally while continuing the evolution of providing culturally safe, contemporary, and responsive care for the communities we serve. I am speaking today about my experience, not as an operations director of VCH, but rather as an avid cyclist and commuter, having commuted to and from VGH by bike for the last 18 years, using Vancouver's usually excellent cycle pathway network. My concerns relate specifically to the cycle pathways along 10th Avenue, which run through the northern edge of the proposed rezoning plan. The section of 10th Avenue bike route from Oak to Heather is, to be frank, extremely dangerous and very scary. I actually avoid it at all costs. The current setup puts cyclists in harm's way seven times between Oak and Heather when you're heading east. The intersection at Laurel Street, two entrances to emergency, the loading bay for the Jim Patterson Pavilion, the loading bay exit and the thoroughfare for the Leon Blackmore Pavilion. and the parking lot between Blue Sun and the Old Heather Pavilion. These are all high-risk areas for cycle-versus-car or cycle-versus-pedestrian incidents. To highlight the magnitude of this issue, in addition to what we heard this morning, I have seen ambulances have to wait for cyclists to zip by before being able to enter the VGH emergency area ambulance bay. Westbound cyclists only has three potential issues in comparison. I am also a pedestrian who regularly crosses 10th Avenue to check in my programs on the north side of 10th Ave. It is just as dangerous. Cyclists, e-scooters, e-bikes are careening along the bike path, weaving in and out as they follow the path. For an analogy, it's like playing a real-life game of Frogger, trying to avoid all the vehicles, bikes, and scooters crossing 10th Avenue, only with no second chances. The buildings on the north side of 10th Avenue care for patients with vision impairment and arthritis. Many of these patients park in the VGH parkade on 12th Avenue, and then they walk over to their appointments. This population has difficulty navigating fast-moving objects and slow reaction times. So unfortunately, it's an accident waiting to happen. I strongly encourage the City of Vancouver to consider revising the 10th Avenue cycle route to put both of the east and west on the north side. Thank you very much for considering my input.

Clerk 16:06:55

Thank you very much.

And as an aside, thank you for the work you do at GF Strong. On a personal note, my mom got really sick with encephalitis, and she spent 11 months at GF Strong. And I fully understand the impact that you have on a lot of people. So thank you. Speaker number three, Anthony Robert Norfolk.

Thank you. Thank you, Mayor and Council.

Excuse me. Too bad. I'll try not to get myself all choked up. I don't know why.

Oh. I wasn't speaking, so I didn't know that I was in need. My apologies.

Thank you.

I've never done that before.

I'm being served by the mayor. Wonderful. My name's Anthony Norfolk. I live in Vancouver. I have, as my message to you all, which I hope you received, as you will gather, I have been involved in advocating for the Heather Pavilion for decades. But I think we need to start off with clearing up one misunderstanding. The Heather Pavilion is not designated. It is a portion, the original portion of the pavilion, the Fairview building, that is what has been designated. So when someone says that 40%, the Heather Pavilion takes up 40% of the site, of the VGH site, What are we talking about? What is 40% of what?

Because the much, much smaller Fairview building is what is in play here.

The staff report is correct in saying it's a portion of the Heather Pavilion. So let's start talking about the Fairview building. not the Heather Pavilion. So the Fairview building is not 40% of anything, let alone the fact that I suspect that 40% is wrong. Now, don't get me wrong. At the age of 84, I am a consumer of services from VGH, which I much appreciate. They are super. Absolutely. But I don't see why... the Fairview Pavilion, the Fairview building, has to go to achieve all that VGH would like to achieve. It is a minuscule portion of the site. Its value has been spoken to and passed on by previous council when designating it. That is rare. It's been through all the processes. And it may not have been used for care for a long time, but it is still occupied and used.

I did precipitate the production for the city quite a while ago of a report by Richard Henriquez that lists the uses to which that building can be put ancillary uses to the broader uses of the hospital.

There are, as someone this morning pointed out, there are examples where heritage buildings have been enclosed, enwrapped in larger buildings. There is absolutely no reason why the Fairview building cannot be treated in the same fashion.

And in fact, Vancouver Coastal Health itself commissioned a report in detail about restoring the building. Detailed report.

I have it. I'm sure it's available to staff.

Because I certainly have Richard Henriquez's report here. You know, it's yay thick.

There is no real valid reason for destroying a designated building. I don't know that it's ever been done. demolishing a designated heritage building. So when I look at the report, I'm simply asking you not to consider the repeal of the designation bylaw. Just simply refrain from supporting this part of the council report. That's my request.

Clerk 16:12:39

Thank you very much. Okay. Speaker number four, Angus Thompson.

Speaker four is not on the line.

Clerk 16:12:50

Not on the line. Okay. Speaker number five, Brianne LaPierre.

Hello, Mayor and Council. My name is Brianne, and I'm speaking today in support of the Vancouver General Hospital Campus Renewal Project. I'm also a member of the Vancouver Heritage Commission, although I'm speaking today in my personal capacity. BGH is one of the most important public institutions in our province. Every day it serves not only Vancouver residents, but patients from across BC, and this proposal establishes a thoughtful, long-term framework to modernize and renew the campus over the coming decades. As a member of the Vancouver Heritage Commission, I know we all bring different perspectives on how to best support our city. We share a commitment to preserving Vancouver's history while ensuring it continues to evolve to meet the needs of future generations. When this project was brought to the commission, I advocated in support of this proposal because I believe heritage conservation and responsible city building goes hand in hand. Heritage is about more than preserving individual buildings. It is about preserving the stories and places that have shaped our city. The Heather Pavilion has served Vancouver with distinction for more than a century and its legacy deserves to be recognized. But we also have to be honest about the reality of the building today. The Heather Pavilion has not been used for patient care for more than 20 years and VCH has determined that its floor plans, circulation systems, and mechanical infrastructure are functionally obsolete. It was built in 1906 for a completely different era of medicine. At some point, preserving a building for its own sake began

I believe our responsibility is to honor its history while ensuring VGH has a modern facility needed to save lives and provide patients and healthcare professionals with the standard of care they deserve. This proposal thoughtfully balances those objectives. It creates a pathway to replace modern aging healthcare infrastructure with modern facilities while improving accessibility, creating new open spaces, and strengthening climate resilience. The population is growing and health care demands are increasing, and facilities built decades ago need to be renewed to meet modern standards. This project does just that. The decision Council makes today will have an impact for generations, and I respectfully encourage Council to support this application. Thank you very much.

Clerk 16:15:04

Thank you very much. Speaking number six, Elliot Klein.

yeah hi my name is ellie klein i'm a resident of east vancouver i live near uh and bike through the develop the general area of vgh pretty regularly once or twice a week um i strongly support this uh this motion i think that plan to modernize and replace any of these uh facilities is definitely beneficial given the growing health care demands that our city faces as it grows and as the population generally is aging And I think the part that I am most interested in is just the general revitalization of the campus area. Now, one thing I would just kind of want to draw some emphasis to, I've heard this brought up already a few times today, but I just wanted to get my own experiences as a cyclist regularly biking through West 10th. My experience heading West, not much of a problem. You're on the North side of the street and you're not generally interfering with any of the access the emergency or hospital spaces. But when I'm biking east on the south side, I'm constantly worried about kind of like crashing into or hitting anybody who's coming in and out of the hospital emergency areas. The biggest problem being is because the bike... lane heads downhill from the east side. So you're catching a lot of speed coming from Oak and you are heading down in the first building that you pass by on the south on the south bike lane is the emergency building or the emergency entrance. as well as other buildings that come up later on, and lots of pedestrian crosswalks. And this just does not really create a conducive environment for cycling, and it makes it more dangerous for any of the hospital services, emergency vehicles, even just people who are maybe walking out of the hospital, nurses who are leaving for break. It's just a dangerous environment. And so I've heard a lot of people propose something that I do believe also is a very good solution, is a bidirectional bike lane on the north side of 10th. I think that this would be beneficial because there's less general vehicle traffic coming in and out of properties on the north side, and also it creates less directions people need to look in when you've got the vehicle traffic traveling on that street. I know whenever I get to any intersection on my bike, you've got cars that are looking one way for the cars on the other way. They're looking for bikes coming from two directions on two sides of the street. It's just incredibly confusing. And I go through the 10th Avenue bikeway all the way out to Kitsilano, all the way out to Commercial. There are many parts of this bike lane that are bidirectional, and they work where the bidirectional is on one side of the street. It works very effectively. It's much safer, and it's a much more conducive way to bike. And I think that if we are looking to revitalize this area, I think that... reshaping and redesigning the bike lane to be bi-directional on the north side should be the main priority but apart from that i agree and support this development thank you very much speaking number seven daniel and then good afternoon mayor and council my name is daniel i'm not a resident of vancouver i reside on the uel and i'm here today to speak in support of the vgh campus renewal proposal thank you for your time TGH is one of the most important healthcare facilities in BC. It serves not only Vancouver residents, but patients from across the province who require specialized and lifesaving care. At the same time, our population is growing and aging. The healthcare infrastructure we rely on today was built for a different era. If we want our healthcare system to continue meeting the needs of future generations, we need to invest in modern facilities now, other than waiting until buildings become inadequate. According to the staff report, FGH campus buildings and infrastructure are aging, with 80% of inpatient beds located in facilities built between 1953 and 1989. Major infrastructure projects require thoughtful planning, but delaying renewal will only make future challenges more difficult and more expensive to address. I encourage council to support this renewal proposal so this essential hospital can continue providing world-class care for decades to come. Thank you very much for your time.

Great, thank you.

Clerk 16:19:15

And finally, speaker number eight, Neil Wiles.

Apologies, can you hear me?

We can hear you great, Neil. Please go ahead.

excellent excellent thank you good afternoon mayor and council uh my name is neil wild i'm with the mount pleasant business improvement association i will do my best to be very very brief i'm here to speak in support of the amendments uh to the broadway plan with regards to the vancouver general hospital campus Sadly, I don't think it'll be the last time that we'll be looking for amendments to the Broadway plan. On the city's own website, Broadway plan states that the area can see up to 64,000 new residents and 45,000 additional jobs. We are in this area, and this area has already seen dramatic growth for the past decade. With that said, expanding services, especially in some of the aging facilities at VGH, seems only logical. The campus can only get as big as it can get because that's the size that it is. We do respect heritage aspects. We do respect them in our own neighbourhood, but I think sometimes the needs of the hospital and the greater community are going to outweigh that. With that said, we fully support this and look forward to seeing these changes over the next 40 years to help the community of Mount Pleasant. Thank you very much and have a great day.

Thank you very much. Okay, and so that's the end of our speakers list. I'd like to thank everyone for coming to speak to council. Would someone like to move a motion? Great, I think that was Councillor Kirby-Young, seconded by Councillor Klassen. Council, is there any discussion?

Clerk 16:21:05

Councillor Domenato, please go ahead.

Thank you. I've circulated an amendment to the report, and so I was trying to log in here. And it is in response to considerations raised earlier on with respect to West 10th in particular. Sorry, can I put you on pause for one second?

I'm just going to restart your timer in the amendment queue. Please go ahead. Sorry about that.

So simply, it's a resolution to address considerations raised about mitigating pedestrian cyclists' vehicle conflicts within the VGH campus, in particular with consideration to West 10th and looking at a bidirectional bike lane as well as one-way vehicle traffic. And so I've circulated that to all of council for consideration. I think it responds to... Questions and concerns that we heard raised and I think an earnest desire to continue that dialogue around how we ensure safety for all in this area that is very very busy and will be probably busier in the future with the expansion of the campus so That's for count That's it council any discussion on the amendment Seeing no one in the queue I'm

Clerk 16:22:34

Ah, okay. So, Councillor Maloney, please go ahead.

Thanks. Yeah, I'm uncomfortable constraining staff with this direction. But really, this whole situation puts this council's decision, I think 2023 decision, not to put bike lanes on Broadway, particularly between Yukon and older streets, look even more unfortunate. We've heard today that a great deal of consultation took place in coming up with the current configuration, which has reduced crashes by 60%, according to ICBC statistics, not personal anecdotes. According to ICBC data, there are far more traffic incidents on both Broadway and 12th than on 10th in the VGH area. Staff have advised that bi-directional bike lanes are more dangerous when the street is not one way. And our staff have reservations about this. They're paid by the city to provide non-partisan expert advice. And with respect, the traffic engineering consultant hired by the hospital was hired to provide advice about how to move the bike lane to the far side of the road, taking into account the interests of the hospital primarily. An unprotected bike lane has been in front of St Paul's emergency entrance on Burrard Street for a long time. It does get less traffic because there are options. It has an unprotected bike lane in front of it, but there's an alternative safer bike route, 1 Street over on Hornby Street. We have a bike route four blocks away on 14th that doesn't go as far as 10th does, so it doesn't attract as much traffic. traffic because of the inconvenience for cyclists. And unfortunately, we don't have a bike lane on Broadway, again, thanks to a vote of this council, which would have been a good idea given that cyclists are going to have to put up with at least a decade of construction at VGH affecting their safety and convenience on 10th.

Thank you very much. Okay. Seeing no one else in the queue.

Clerk 16:24:54

Right. Sorry. Do we know who's on the queue? Because I'm not seeing anyone on here right now.

We need a couple of minutes or.

only have councillor dominato on the main queue oh okay okay well i'll take a two-minute recess just to okay yeah thank you thank you

Okay.

Can I get started, though? Is Councillor Meiszner the first one? Great. Thank you. Okay. Sorry for the delay. Councillor Meiszner, please go ahead.

Yeah, thank you. I am going to support this amendment from Councillor Domenato because we've heard clearly from VGH staff that are there, gosh, probably every day of the year. I know how hardworking you all are. and about the conflicts that are occurring with the current configuration of the unidirectional bike lane. And I think exploring moving the bike lane to a bidirectional format on the north side of 10th is certainly worth exploring, and I think those discussions should be part of this conversation. So I appreciate this amendment, and I'm very supportive of it. to reduce those conflicts between emergency vehicles and cyclists, as we've heard from some of our speakers today. Thanks. Thank you, Councillor Kirby-Young.

Yeah, thanks, Mayor. I'll be brief, and I think that it's incumbent on Council to look at exploration for this. It's struck by the irony and also how sad it is that a VGH employee, who I know healthcare professionals are in the business of saving, and supporting the health of people coincided or collided with a cyclist. Like that is troublesome, and I'm sure it was pretty traumatic for the staff person as well to have that experience. And it was also quite compelling. I think we heard that in some of the research there wasn't an example identified where there is a major hospital that has a bike lane running, a separated one running directly across where we have an emergency situation. Department so I think that's fairly compelling I know that this was a really live debate a couple of councils ago because of the nature of not just VGH but the adjacent facilities and you've got a lot of folks in there that are going for fairly significant treatments or may have mobility issues the arthritis center spinal cords skin care PC cancer and others and I know there was concern at the time and it You know, I'd sort of try to apply the, I'm not a medical professional or a transportation engineer, but I try to apply the common sense perspective. And when you have vulnerable populations that are in and around an area and you know that your population is going to be growing and medical services will only continue to increase in importance, it doesn't make a lot of sense to put something in that's going to create conflict. So I think there's enough of a grace of time here, I think, to explore and look at this option and see if it's viable. And I also think it might be helpful to inform future City of Vancouver transportation planning. It's great to have separated bike lanes and have them on both sides of the street where space allows, but we also want to increase our cycling infrastructure in general in other areas in the city, and we don't always have space on all of our roadways to do that, fully separated on both sides necessarily. We've done it, for example, it's been a priority for Council on the Granville Street Bridge and... other areas in key infrastructure where we can, but I think this may actually potentially open up other opportunities to do it in space-constrained areas. So I think it's a good exploration to look at, and I support doing that. I do think it's very important to sort of get that work underway and provide the direction because it will help with the planning. And we know that... having some sort of key parameters defined around projects is really important in major capital projects today because they are increasingly complex to deliver and they become increasingly expensive over time. So I think an early exploration of that actually should hopefully help the finances as opposed to trying to deal with something down the road and not sort of like tackling it up front. So I appreciate Councillor Dominato bringing the amendment and I do support it. Thank you.

Thank you, Councillor Zhoul. I think I'm on the main queue, not amendment queue. But I support this amendment. Thank you, Councillor Maloney.

No, I've already spoken to the amendment.

Thank you, Councillor Claston. Sorry, I'm supposed to be on the main queue. Okay, Mayor. Councillor Bligh.

Yeah, thanks very much. Sorry, I had to just step out during that recess. But a point of information through you, Chair, to staff on this amendment. I just want to clarify, it seems like the language is pretty open-ended in this. It's not saying, Paul, I can see you. Maybe, Paul, to you. I can see your head peeking over there. Look, there's been lots of discussion about this. I think it's worthy of continued conversation. There's obviously significant cost in the multimillion dollar range for movement of this, the spike lane, if that becomes the optimal decision, as well as one way on 10th has a number of considerations. So I guess I'm just asking in the language provided here. To me, the key words are to continue discussions, essentially, with options and then the consideration of. So they're all pretty like noncommittal, open-ended. Is that the kind of direction you think is helpful?

Yeah, that's how I would read that. And particularly, you know, looking to mitigating conflicts, whenever there's a conflict point, there's never, it's never 100% safe. It's something we wanted to do anyway, was look at how through development we can improve the bike lane. And we want to continue to talk to VGH about what those options are. So this leaves it quite open, I think, for improvements.

Yeah, okay. Okay, thank you. That's helpful. I'm willing to support this because I do think we're in very early stages and we should continue the conversation. You know, it's not lost on me the amount of calls we actually are hearing about these days in terms of injury with Lime scooters. I have to say in this emergency room is probably dealing with a significant spike in whether it's to do with the recent tourism summer, what have you. But it's not lost on me how much you're dealing with active transportation accidents that are had traumas and things like that unrelated to this bike lane. So it just seems like there's a lot happening in this space. We should keep the conversation going. But I think we have to recognize that cycling is actually maybe not the biggest risk right now in terms of active transportation across the city. We're hearing more and more that scooters are eclipsing cycling accidents. I think we do need to keep this conversation going and maybe there's a future decision actually around the choices we've made in regards to what we allow on our streets, not just how they move across the city. So I'll leave it there. Thank you.

Thank you. Councillor Maloney.

Thanks. I'm sorry, I'm not quite sure how much time I have left, but I just have a question for Paul through point of information.

So the capital, I want to know about the effect on staff resources in terms of this area of expertise in our city because I understand that we're only planning to undertake 20 kilometres of both new cycling routes and upgraded cycling routes in our capital plan over the next four years, which is a disappointingly small amount. And I understand that one of the constraints is staff capacity. So if we redesign this, how does that affect staff capacity and potentially put back other projects that might improve the safety of cyclists within our city?

That's a good question. With this direction, like in the plan, we'd identified that we hadn't gotten to the end of our conversation with VGH and had proposed that we would continue to work with them on it. It will take some staff resources. We'll hopefully be in a place where we can deliver the capital plan fully and do this work. But we haven't fully scoped out what this investigation is going to look like.

Okay, thanks very much.

Thank you. Okay, seeing no one else in the queue, we will put Councillor Domonato's amendment to vote.

Clerk 16:35:32

If you can please go to the voting panel.

Great, and the amendment passes with Councillors Maloney in opposition and Councillor Orr abstaining. So, Councillor Domonato.

I have nothing further at this time. Thank you.

Thank you. Councillor Meiszner.

Nothing further either. Thank you.

Councillor Maloney.

Thanks. Is this my last opportunity to speak to the motion?

Yes, unless there's another amendment.

I'm sorry?

Unless there's another amendment or whatever.

I don't have another amendment. I contemplated one about putting bike lanes on Broadway, but I'm holding my fire on that. I just wanted to express my enthusiastic support for the alteration of the Broadway plan to include the rebuild of VGH. I think that it's incredibly important that we get this going as quickly as possible because I'm deeply uncomfortable about the condition of the buildings. given that if we have a big earthquake, hopefully that won't happen any time in the next few decades so that we can have a suitable set of emergency services buildings where we can properly respond instead of having those buildings in danger as well. I think that... Obviously, the conditions that staff are working in and the conditions that patients have to deal with are very poor and very difficult. So it's with, yes, great enthusiasm that I'll be voting in favour of this. Thank you.

Councillor Clarson.

Thanks very much, Mayor, and I just want to thank staff. for bringing forward this important long-term vision for the Vancouver General Hospital campus. This is really one of the most important institutions in our city, and I think we as a city should be grateful for both the employment and also the health care services that it brings to our city. And I know that it serves patients from both Vancouver and across BC, and is a place where thousands of families experience life's greatest joys and its greatest challenges. In fact, Vancouver General Hospital was where I was born in the early 1960s, and my parents had their first apartment on 12th Avenue nearby the hospital. So I have a fairly long connection to the place. We heard a comment today that the hospital design is driven by medicine, and that's important. Clinical care, research, and patient outcomes must always come first. But I also think the great hospitals help shape great cities. And VGH is more than a collection of buildings or beds. It has to be seen as a part of Vancouver's urban fabric. The streets, the public spaces, the landscaping, and architecture all contribute to the experience of patients, families, visitors, and healthcare professionals, of course, who work there every day. Thoughtful urban design can contribute to healing, create a welcoming environment, and strengthen the surrounding neighborhood. And this is what I believe we should be aspiring to. Vancouver Coastal Health plays an extraordinary role in delivering world-class care, and as I say, we're very lucky to have it. But the conditions in the hospital today, as we know, are not conducive to providing quality care or even a happy workplace. So I'd like to acknowledge the VGH and UBC Hospital Foundation for its leadership in securing the philanthropic support that helps fund new equipment, research, and future facilities. And your collective work will help to build one of Canada's leading health care campuses. So looking ahead, we know that the Broadway Subway is an incredibly exciting part of this community that will help transform access to the campus. It will become even more connected for patients, health care workers, researchers, students, visitors, and strengthening its role as one of Canada's premier centers for health care and innovation. I also recognize the concerns that have been expressed, including myself, regarding the Heather Pavilion. I have a genuine appreciation for Vancouver's architectural heritage, and I regret that we could be losing that. But I'm heartened by the fact that we're having conversations about recognizing that heritage in some way. And we talked about the granite blocks, of course. I understand that the campus must continue to evolve to meet the health care needs of future generations, and I believe this framework strikes an appropriate balance. This policy positions the campus well and adds to Vancouver's health care needs for decades to come. So thanks to everyone who contributed to this work, and I'll be very pleased to support this. Thank you. Thank you, Councillor Kirby-Young.

Yeah, thanks. I'll be brief because I know we have a lot of business. I just want to express gratitude for the plan. I know it's almost 125 years ago now that the original facility was developed and it's gone through upgrades and iterations over that time. But this is a substantive vision that will be built out over 30 years, so literally the next generation. So people will see their kids and grandkids being serviced here. And we have very acute pressures in our city, not just for housing, but for taking care of the folks that we have here in the city, and that's a really important part of it. So the city's role really is to try to be a good partner to create the right conditions that will enable sort of a world-class healthcare facility to be built. I also do want to recognize and appreciate the speakers, including the gentleman that spoke about and called it the Fairview building as well. There are trade-offs. These are not always easy ones to make. But I do think that there will be a very positive legacy, not just for health care, but hopefully creation of a real wellness environment in this area. Thank you.

Thank you very much, Councillor Zhou.

Yeah, thanks, Mayor. Also, I'm wholeheartedly supporting this report today. I'm actually so glad to see this plan finally come to council. It's been like a long overdue project, I think, for our city. As someone who spent 15 years working in operations in healthcare, I have a first-hand understanding. of the complexity of hospital operations. Hospitals never stop. They operate 24-7 while balancing patient care, emergency response, research, education, because you are teaching hospital and thousands of staff working together. I also understand how difficult it is to modernize an aging hospital while continuing to provide uninterrupted care. Unlike many other developments, you can't simply close a hospital for renovations. Every decision has to prioritize patient safety, continuity of care, and operational efficiency. That's why I believe this policy framework is so important. This report also makes very clear that the VGH campus has reached a very critical point. As we saw from this report, approximately 80% of inpatient beds are located in buildings constructed between 1953 and 1989. The ED was built in 1970s and no longer large enough to meet demand. And the healthcare demand is expected to grow by 25% by 2035. So clearly status quo isn't an option. So what Council is considering today is to establish a long-term policy framework that allows Vancouver Coastal Health to plan for the next 30 years while ensuring that future rezonings will still come back to Council for public review and approval. So there is a transparency and accountability there. And also for my question, I'm also really like the flexibility provided in this policy. I remember when I was supporting the Surrey Memorial Hospital, the redevelopment project there, the next day after the opening, the occupancy rate in the emergency department was already at 100%. So we need to really think about 30 years, even 50 years down the road. And I really appreciate the staff have worked to balance multiple objectives. And also, we need to give our healthcare system the flexibility to grow and adapt. We need to improve access for patients, visitors, staff, emergency services. We need better public space, stronger walking connections, and improved integration with the surrounding neighborhood. And I also appreciate this policy recognizes the unique transportation needs of a major regional hospital. It supports walking, cycling, transit improvement, while maintaining flexibility needed for ambulance, patient drop-off, deliveries, hospital operations, and also people who rely on driving to the hospital because of the mobility issue. Yeah, with my previous experience, I know that good hospital design isn't just about constructing something bigger. It's about creating space that helps doctors, nurses, and healthcare professionals deliver best patient care, reduce operational challenges, improve patient outcome, and prepare our healthcare system for the future. So ultimately, this report is about ensuring Vancouver General Hospital can continue serving British Columbians for generations to come. It provides a very thoughtful framework that balances healthcare needs, neighborhood integration, transportation, public space, sustainability, and heritage, while preserving council's oversight through our accountability and transparency mandate. So for this reason, I am pleased to support the recommendations, and also I want to express my deepest appreciation to staff, to the Vancouver General Hospital, and the Vancouver Coastal Health. Thank you for everything you have done for our province, for our city. Thanks.

Thank you, Councillor Bligh.

Thank you, and thank you, Councillor Zhou, for articulating all that is important about what...

our health care system and hospitals do locally. And I think this is an exciting time for our city, of course, with St. Paul's and then with the VGH precinct sort of revitalization, if you will, for the future. So happy to be supporting. I'll just be very brief. We have a lot on in the next day and a bit. But really, I just want to highlight the opportunity I feel like we have to connect through this redevelopment plan. And so I think I've made that pretty clear so far. And it's because of what's south of this massive block and then, of course, what's north of it is just a major transit corridor. And so it's both what's happening in the hospital, but also how the surrounding communities relate to it. And I really see that as an opportunity to have a really robust, well-planned, cohesive sort of urban center hospital that really drives walkability and safety, as well as, of course, the existing active transportation law. West 10th. There are parts of our city that I think are incredibly walkable because somebody thought of something at some point, whether it's a little walkway in between two buildings. Human nature is we're looking for the shortest path to get somewhere and people are more likely. to access mainly active transportation over their vehicles if they perceive they can get there faster by walking. And I think that's what the high speed subway line does on Broadway and why it's such a unique benefit to the hospital. So whether it's people who are accessing the hospital for work or visiting people or their own healthcare appointments, as well as how the surrounding residents view the hospital as a link to the rest of the city, not something they have to sort of get around. And so if we're talking about big picture planning on this site, that's what I'm quite excited about. I will say it's regrettable that we have to deal with the building that's designated as heritage. And I can appreciate the cost and the seismic and all the pieces that have made that building, unfortunately, something that... needs to be considered. But I just want to recognize the speaker who did come to speak and holds up the value of heritage across our city. I do think that that is incredibly important. And, you know, if there are ways to preserve that in whatever form that looks like, I suspect everybody will be working together to make sure that that happens. But it is regrettable, but I will support everything that's sort of come forward today as well as, of course, the amendment that was moved and look forward to a future clearer vision in 2027 in terms of what that looks like.

Thank you.

Thank you. Councillor Frye. Yeah, thanks. Also happy to support the report and the policy update. VGH may be named for our city, but really, and it seems like it's our backyard, but really this is an important institution for the entire province. And I think this ensures that it will continue to be, and it will be the hospital of the future and for the future. And, you know, I spent a fair amount of time at VGH as a patient, as a supportive friend and family member during some dark times, but also as a really bored kid when my families who were... called to work but stuck for a sitter would drag me to VGH and have to wait around. And what struck me from our recent visit in behind the scenes and under in the tunnels was how little some of the aspects had really changed and how aged the facilities were and recognizing that that really does require that big picture long-term framework to renew the facilities, to expand the facilities, to modernize the facilities, and making all of that happening of course, while you're maintaining a continuity of care for patients who are so reliant on the services at FGH.

I'm also disappointed that we didn't see an opportunity to integrate the original Heather Pavilion, but I recognize that these are... challenging uh constructs within a pretty confined space i also would have liked to see more purposeful integration with the new transit infrastructure this new transit spine that we're going to be putting in along broadway and and recognizing those great channel challenges we talked about just getting from broadway subway up the hill but i'm confident that those will probably come at some point and um And I'm also hoping that this project will actually catalyze more work towards a Broadway cycling path because I think we are seeing where the challenges with West 10th may be more apparent. And indeed, some of the challenges with West 10th as we go east are also pretty challenging. And I think this all calls for more decisive action on delivering. significant cycling infrastructure along Broadway, especially as we see the emergence of the subway will reduce traffic.

But on the whole, I'm very supportive of this, and I really appreciate that we are making this move forward and those critical investments in health care infrastructure that we need. And I'm very hopeful for the future of EGH. And I really thank everybody for the work going into this.

Thank you very much. Seeing no one else in the queue, I'm going to call the vote.

Clerk 16:51:42

Please go to the voting panel.

Great. And that passes unanimously. So congratulations. Thank you for all your hard work.

Thank you.

One, two, three. We have a comment. So, Council.

Sir, guys.

Clerk 16:53:00

Councillor Zhou, guys.

Okay. So, after a discussion with the clerks and due to time-sensitive LOA requests, would someone be willing to move a motion to vary the agenda to consider item one under new business to deal with the LOAs? Once we have considered the LOAs, we will follow the regular agenda and consider report number three.

Great.

Clerk 16:53:26

Councillor Meiszner, seconded by Councillor... Go ahead.

Will we be returning to new business after that one item? Okay, so we're just doing the LOAs.

Just the LOAs because it's time sensitive. Yeah, happy to support that. Thanks, Mayor. Any other discussion around that? Okay. All in favor say yay. All those opposed say nay. Great. We will vary the agenda.

So... Mayor, can I... I'm on the queue for another point of procedure. Would you like to deal with it after the LOAs? I just want to deal with it before we start the next item. I said I'm on the queue for another point of procedure. Would you like to do it after the LOAs? I just want to do it before the capital plan.

Thank you very much. Okay, so we're going to deal with the first issue of new business, and that's requests for leaves of absence. This motion has been circulated to council at the beginning of the meeting and is available on the screen.

Okay, so the most recent version has just been emailed in the last few moments, so that should be the working copy.

At 307.

Is version something now?

Great.

So has everyone had a chance to review it? Okay. Counsel, is there any discussion?

Oh, we haven't moved the motion.

Happy to move it.

Great. Thank you, Counselor Bly, seconded by Counselor Klassen. Any discussion?

Seeing none, all those in favor say yay. All those opposed say nay. Great. The motion carries unanimously.

Sorry, Chair, for the interruption, but there is a couple of folks who have let me know that it's frozen online, the video, for about the last four minutes. So I just want to make sure that our IT team are on it. Thank you. That's all.

Thank you very much. Okay. So now we are going to go back to – actually, sorry, Councillor Kirby-Young, you had a question around –

I do. I have a point of procedure, and I just wanted to inquire, given where we are on the day, if we're able to provide some information in terms of to folks that are waiting on the other items, what we think our pacing will be. I note that we're scheduled to finish at 5. I'm just noting the capital plan is a pretty robust item, and we reconvene on Thursday from 1 to 5. That might take the majority of the time. I'm just wondering if you can confirm through the clerks that... any remaining items capital plan and the others will either go to Thursday 1 to 5 or to the following Monday reserve from 1 to 5 I know there's a number of folks that are looking to get a sense of when their items will be heard and I'm guessing that between today and most of Thursday I'll take capital plan and other items may go over to Monday is that correct just looking to give some information to people that have been waiting

Clerk 16:58:18

This will, the reconvene date right now is Thursday, this Thursday at 1 p.m. And I'm just checking with, oh, and on the 21st at 9.30 a.m.

Okay. So not on the afternoon of the 20th?

Clerk 16:58:35

No. 1 to 5 where we have a reserve? No.

So any items that don't get dealt with Thursday 1 to 5 that are on this agenda after the capital plan will go to Tuesday the 21st. Correct. At 9.30. Okay. Can I ask a follow-up question then? Sure. No, that's fine. That answers my question. Thank you.

Okay. Thank you very much. Councillor Domonato.

Yes. There's a point of information in varying the agenda to deal with the LOAs. Did we vary it to address inquiries in new business?

We're going to go back to that.

Clerk 16:59:15

Only item one under new business was buried. We will deal with the rest of the new business. Any inquiries on other matters?

Correct. Before five?

Clerk 16:59:24

No, we won't.

Okay. Okay. Thank you. So sorry. May I ask?

Yeah. If you can get in the queue, please.

Oh, sorry. Yeah.

Thank you. Counselor Bly, go ahead.

I appreciate this discussion because it's important that we're clear. So can I just get clarification on when the new business items will be heard under this council agenda?

Clerk 16:59:43

Yeah, in the order of business that they're outlining.

Right, so that could happen when, if it's not before 5 today?

Clerk 16:59:49

It could be on Thursday between 1 and 5, or it could be until, couldn't be until Tuesday possibly. Because it's at the end of the agenda, so it depends on how long the items take.

Right. So sometimes what we've done is vary the agenda to deal with new business items. And so I'm wondering if that is an option today.

If that's a request, you'd have to get it seconded and we'd have to discuss it and then vote on it, I would assume. Is that correct? We would need a two-thirds vote in favor.

Two-thirds in favor. Yeah, I mean, I think just clarity is one thing to continue on with the items on the agenda. It's another thing to offer some clarity. And given the discussion this morning, I think that would be helpful. So I'd like to move that motion that we deal with new business items.

Okay. I'm sorry. If you can just give us a moment here.

Okay, so just to understand this correctly, so Councillor Bligh, you're putting a motion on the floor to cover off the rest of new business. Is that correct? Yeah. Great, thank you.

No, just new business. And then that was seconded by Councillor Orr. Councillor, is there any discussion?

Okay, so with that, we'll... Oh, sorry, sorry.

Councillor Kirby young yeah thank you I appreciate the desire to do that but I just out of respect to all the folks that are waiting for all their items and the expectation of the published agenda with the order that the items are gonna be considered in I will not be supporting the motion to vary I have no way of knowing how many new business items they are, if they're urgent or not. But I do know that we have a lot of folks that have been waiting patiently in the order and rejigging their day. There is an opportunity for them to be considered, and we have time and reserve dates set aside. So I'm not concerned that it's not that the items won't be dealt with, but I think out of respect to everybody who has been patiently waiting and working through the order, I'd like to stick with that. Thank you.

Thank you very much, Councillor. Councillor Bligh.

Yeah, thanks. I just do remind, you know, this process here, like I do appreciate that there are counselors that may see things differently in this chamber. But at this point, there's a massive curveball that was put forward this morning that has changed the public's ability to engage with a great deal of business that we do here. I think that what we're asking for, and it's been clear, I was very clear this morning because I'm not here to really be coy about this. It's that there is a motion that I think needs some certainty. And my concern is if it goes off into future reserve days, that there'll be some other procedural piece that might get moved that prevents it from actually being heard. I think is fair concern given the state of this meeting and the state of the meeting this morning. So that's, I'm just going to be very clear about the intent and I hope that we can deal with

business today and settle this piece thank you very much okay seeing no one else in the queue i'm going to call the vote if you can please go to the voting panel okay and that fails with um myself councillors kirby young dominato montague class and meisner and joe in opposition

Okay, so we will go back to item number three, which is the 2027 through 2030 capital plan. Before we begin this agenda item, if anyone believes that they have a conflict of interest, now is the time to declare it. Does anybody have a conflict of interest to disclose? Seeing none, this item does have a presentation, and we do have team members to present the item.

Clerk 17:05:21

So, Paul, please go ahead.

Colin Knight, General Manager of Finance and Supply Chain. I'm here to present the 2027 to 2030 capital plan.

I'm going to start with an overview of the citywide context, and then I'm going to be joined by a number of city leadership team colleagues who will present overviews of the service categories, areas included in the capital plan, followed by a presentation of the public engagement results related to the capital plan.

So when we look at the capital plan overall, this plan is a $3.5 billion draft capital plan. It includes an additional $0.1 billion in in-kind amenities. And in comparison, this is an increase to the previous 2023 to 2026 capital plan, which had a city-led portion of $3.3 billion. And I'll speak in the presentation about some of the factors that are supporting the increase in the capital plan. But a large focus of the plan is on fixing and protecting essential infrastructure. This is based on direction provided by council. And so over 70% of the capital plan will be allocated to the renewal and maintenance of essential infrastructure. As part of the plan, we've included an accelerated infrastructure renewal, which is based on direction previously provided by council to increase the infrastructure levy at 2% each year. We've also reviewed borrowing capacity and are proposing increased borrowing to address investment in essential infrastructure. As you'll see in the capital plan and accompanying report, we've taken a program-based approach which provides an opportunity to have funding to be allocated in areas as scope costs, operating impacts of projects are designed and developed. And lastly, just to emphasize that this capital plan has been developed, including public engagement feedback, and we'll talk about the findings of the public engagement as part of this presentation, and detail is included in the accompanying report.

So if we look at the 2027 to 2030 capital plan, a few points to start off with.

Clerk 17:08:26

The plan is developed using the city's capital planning framework, which looks at mid to long-term strategies, community plans, and overall service strategies in developing and informing the capital plan. This plan is a four-year capital plan, and it informs the annual capital budget over the course of the next four years. So the objective for this capital plan is to provide this four-year investment framework guided by council and board priorities, and this capital plan informs plebiscite borrowing, so the request that will go to the electorate as part of the plebiscite in October, and provides a plan for critical renewal and development of new infrastructure. Key inputs for development of the capital plan include council direction provided in the months leading up to the capital plan development, asset conditions, so information on facility condition that's been used to prioritize investments, which we summarize in this presentation and report. We consider the funding environment, so the capacity for funding, which is informed by taxes and fee projections and assessment of borrowing capacity. We look at initiatives already underway, so that's considered as well. And for some areas, and I'll speak to this, have a significant number of projects in the pipeline, and so that's considered as we look at developing the upcoming capital plan. We incorporate community and strategic plans in a variety of service areas. We also consider external funding opportunities in the capital plan development.

Some of the context informing the development of this plan. The economic and fiscal environment is one of uncertainty caused by geopolitical disruption that's impacting supply chain and driving up costs of fuel and construction. We also are in an environment of growing senior government budget fiscal deficits, which is constraining the availability of funding partnerships. And that factors into the projects that the city can incorporate in its capital plan. As we've presented to council previously, there's significant challenge around infrastructure renewal. And this has accumulated over many years and is an issue that's shared with many cities of similar age across the country. And it's really around aging assets and past underinvestment. In addition, we see the development industry is experiencing a large-scale slowdown that results in lower development-related revenue for the city. But as I noted, the capital plan is growing, and that's supported in large part by direction the council has taken around increasing city funding for infrastructure.

Clerk 17:11:31

And notably, the council direction provided recently to approve a 2% infrastructure levy to accelerate renewed investments and needed renewal. I'll speak now around asset inventory. So as noted, this information is a summary of asset information which has been used to inform capital plan development. I think, as you'll see in the information shown on this slide and the subsequent slides, there's a significant breadth, a number of assets that have a very large value and significant age. And in some areas, facility conditions that are below good. And so we need to make sure that and through this plan we provide investment that supports improving renewal and infrastructure condition.

So the 2% levy to accelerate infrastructure renewal will make a significant difference in the ability to address the $500 million annual infrastructure deficit. And so council over the past four years has supported 1% increases in the infrastructure levy, which has... added a significant amount of funding in the current capital plan. And with the 2% infrastructure increases directed by council, it'll provide an additional $250 million over the course of the capital plan. So as you can see in the chart, this accumulates and it has the impact of reducing the amount of time it will take to close the infrastructure deficit. It would take an estimated 40 years to close the deficit with a 1% increase, but because of the power of compounding with the 2% increase, we are able to close that gap in 20 years. So a halving of the amount of time it's estimated to take to address the infrastructure deficit.

I'll now shift to just talking about some highlights on the current 2023 to 2026 capital plan. I want to emphasize that significant progress has been made in delivering the capital plan, and that's based on improvements in delivery processes and efforts taken across the organization to ensure that we're able to expedite the delivery of projects. And as a result, Over 93% of the capital plan will be allocated by the end of 2026, and there will be construction that will continue into this year and future years, but significant progress relative to prior years around capital delivery.

Clerk 17:14:37

And you can see a number of the initiatives that are highlighted that have been delivered or in progress of being instructed as part of the current capital plan.

I'll now move to a summary of the 2027 to 2030 capital plan. Just to note again, as emphasized, council direction was incorporated in the plan development. Of course, there's many pieces of direction that can't be summarized here, but this provides a summary of some of the key capital plan-related direction that informed the plan development and is reflected in the proposed plan.

And this is a breakdown of the $3.5 billion proposed plan and the service areas where funds are allocated, again, with a significant focus on renewal of infrastructure.

And some of the key initiatives are highlighted here. The next section of the presentation will provide some more details on the various highlights, and the report has significant details around projects and programs contemplated in the plan.

And in addition to discussing the projects, we also have a focus on outcomes that will be achieved through the planned investments.

And the plan report that accompanies this includes a geographical view of the investments proposed in the plan. And as you'll see, there's significant investment across all areas of the city included in this plan.

Looking at how we will pay for this plan, you'll see that 73% is city contributions, 21% development contributions, and 6% partner contributions. And I will emphasize this is a shift from what we've seen in prior plans. In prior plans, it would be approximately 60%.

60% city contribution and 40% development and partner contributions. And so with the slowdown in the development market and with the constraints on senior government budgets, we've seen a shift and accompanying with council's direction to invest in renewal that's driving this shift to 73% city contributions. Were it not for the direction to increase City funding towards renewal, this plan would be smaller than the prior plan, but this approach is needed to advance critical investments in infrastructure renewal.

Clerk 17:17:49

Looking at borrowing capacity, so as a normal part of the capital plan, we assess borrowing capacity. We look at metrics that our credit rating agencies use to assess our borrowing. We look at future impacts on operating budgets. And I'll note that the city has received the strongest credit ratings, AAA credit ratings. Because of our strong approach, and so we've looked at our borrowing capacity and also incorporated independent advice assessment of our borrowing capacity and are recommending that we do have the capacity to increase borrowing in a responsible and financially prudent way to support investments in community infrastructure and renewal. And So the proposed plan and proposed borrowing is within the metrics that are responsible and prudent. However, at the same time, we are not recommending to increase above this amount because, again, as we increase beyond these metrics, it creates risks around the city's credit rating as well as impacts on future budgets in terms of affordability.

And so related to this, as part of the report, you'll see the proposed plebiscite borrowing of $790 million, just under $0.8 billion. And this, if approved by council, would be the plebiscite borrowing question that would be put to the electorate in October. And you'll see the breakdown of the recommended borrowing summarized here.

As part of our capital planning, we also look at the impacts on future operating budgets related to investments. And so when we make investments in new and expanded facilities, there are costs associated with operating those facilities that have to be factored into future budgets. We also have to factor in costs around repaying, borrowing. as part of the plan. So this summarizes the future impacts that will need to be accommodated in the budget as part of the plan. But again, this is consistent with prior years and something that is needed to support investments and renewal and growth.

So for the next section, I'm going to call on colleagues from the city leadership team to present an overview of some of the highlights of proposed both assets and service categories delivered as part of this current capital plan, as well as highlights of the proposed 2027 to 2030 capital plan. And so I'll first...

Clerk 17:20:51

And you can see the categories that will be included here. I'll first call Lon LeClair to speak on the streets area. You can use the arrows. Good afternoon, Mayor and Council. I'm LeClaire, General Manager of Engineering Services. So for this category, this is probably one of the most visible and consequential for most people's daily lives, is the streets category. The assets in this category include 1,500 kilometers of roads, tens of thousands of poles, almost 1,000 traffic signals, 30 vehicle bridges, of which six are major. What we've delivered so far in this capital plan are approximately 20 kilometers of new or improved bike lanes, 60 kilometers of roads renewed, 7 kilometers of sidewalks renewed. Thousands of poles have been replaced. Importantly, we started the renewal of the Granville Bridge. Phase 1 was completed. This is structural repair and recoding of the Granville Bridge steel frame. We've also closed the RFP on the means prevention fencing. This is the conceptual design. We have a consultant secured, so it's funded out of this plan, but it continues into the next plan. We've also completed the first phase of the Canby Bridge seismic upgrade and started the second phase. When we look to the next plan, what we're proposing to do, similar investments for cycling, which is another 20 kilometers of new or improved bike lanes. But we are looking at doubling the lane kilometers of road renewal, increasing sidewalk renewal by about three times what we did in the last plan. We will be continuing the structural repair and recoding of the Granville Bridge in the next phases and anticipating if we complete the conceptual design for the means prevention fencing by the end of 2027, we would then be moving on to detailed design and implementation of that.

Just to highlight the Canby Bridge work, this is a big project. The seismic upgrade results in a very significant improvement in seismic performance of the bridge. This project is a project that really wouldn't be happening if it wasn't for significant funding from the federal government to the tune of $84 million through the Disaster Mitigation and Adaptation Fund, but also very significant contributions from TransLink.

Another thing I did want to highlight as well, earlier this year, Council received a presentation from staff on the VANSTAT on the conditions of the roads and sidewalks. And in that presentation, you would have seen that the average condition of the road has been deteriorating for the last couple of decades. As a result, Council directed staff to include $104 million in renewal in this area.

Clerk 17:23:58

What that means is that for the first time in decades, actually, we will see the average road condition actually improve in the next capital plan over the next four years. In addition to that, and somewhat similarly, TransLink has also increased the funding for the major road network, almost tripling the funding of the funding that will be spent in Vancouver.

I'll pass it over to Steve.

Good afternoon, Mayor and Council. I'm going to be sharing the parks and public spaces plan as part of the capital plan. So parks and public open spaces often fill the role of third place for many of Vancouver, providing the many amenities and needs that fill the space between life and our time at work or school. For many, these spaces create a sense of belonging, provide an opportunity for health and wellness, and moments for disconnection and clarity. The city's parks and public open spaces network consists of a wide range of assets, as you can see on the screen, that people interact with every day, from the seawall and waterfront spaces to sports fields and courts, playgrounds, dog parks, plazas, and the essential facilities like washrooms and field houses. These spaces are part of the daily experience of living in Vancouver. When these spaces are designed and well maintained, Vancouver achieves a level of livability that sets it apart from cities around the world. These investments we are discussing today are focused on maintaining and improving these spaces so that they continue to meet the needs of a growing city while remaining accessible, welcoming, and resilient for years to come.

As I prepare to guide council and the public through materials supporting the important decisions today, a review of what can be achieved over four years is best captured by looking at what we've come to accomplish over the past four. Of the $273 million of city-led capital programming in the last four years, approximately 99% has already been allocated and in the process of being delivered or delivered. The park board team and engineering team are proud to have delivered two exceptionally strong capital delivery years in 2024 and 2025, both exceeding over 100% of delivery. And we remain on pace for 2026 for another solid year. Of note on this slide is the breadth of what has been delivered. We've invested across the entire parks and public spaces system rather than focusing on any single asset type. In park amenities, we've added new parks, upgraded existing parks, expanded sports infrastructure, renewed playgrounds, and advanced planning for our future inclusive destination playground. In our natural areas and urban forest work, we've restored habitat through creek daylighting projects, implemented green rainwater infrastructure, and planted approximately 11,000 trees. We've continued investing in our seawall and waterfront assets, renewing piers and marine structures that are critical to public access to our long-term and long-term asset management. And delivery included upgraded park buildings and infrastructure, including washrooms, fleet assets, decorative water features such as the Queen Elizabeth Park dancing fountains and waterfall. And finally, we've contributed to expanding and improving the public gathering spaces through public realm improvements, permanent neighborhood plazas, temporary public spaces that support vibrant and active communities, notably the improvements in Gastown and Granville Street.

Clerk 17:27:07

and the many neighborhood plazas that were either temporary and now converted to permanent, or new temporary plazas that are in place today. Overall, the current capital plan reflects significant investment in both maintaining existing assets and expanding opportunities for recreation, gathering, and access to nature across Vancouver.

As we focus on the four years to come, the proposed investment is $278 million, with funding coming from a combination of city contributions and developer-led funding. much of these investments being delivered by the Park Board and engineering teams, and in many cases, both. Overall, the plan reflects a balanced approach that focuses on maintaining service levels, renewing critical infrastructure, and making targeted investments where demand is greatest. The largest proposed area of investments is park amenities. This includes growth and renewal of our existing park system, as well as improvements within these spaces that increase accessibility, safety, playability, and year-round use across the city. In subsequent slides, I will highlight three priority projects for a little bit more detail. We're also continuing to work in the urban forest and natural areas, supporting biodiversity, habitat enhancements, tree planting, and climate resilience. and a significant portion of the plan is directed towards park buildings, infrastructure, and fleet, including investments in improving public access to washrooms and addressing aging infrastructure throughout our system. Finally, we're proposing investments in public realm improvements, pedestrian zones, and plazas, again through work with engineering and oftentimes led by engineering, to support public life, community events, business activity, and safe gatherings throughout Vancouver.

Highlighting one exciting project is the Broad Slopes Project. Again, this is a piece of work jointly led by Park Board and engineering. This is a really great example of how creating new park space in areas experiencing significant growth create benefits that can be achieved when departments work together. As a key destination and connection point along the Arbutus Greenway, this project will deliver a multifunctional neighborhood park. That includes open lawn space, a skate and small wheels area, pollinator and rain gardens, dog off-leash area, public washroom facilities, gathering spaces, and accessible pathways. The location is particularly important because it serves the Broadway Plan area and will provide benefits to more than 19,000 residents who live within a 10-minute walk of the space. One of the key outcomes of this park provision is increasing park provision by 40% in that neighborhood, and the project's estimated budget of $8.8 million is already underway and is expected to be complete in 2029.

Another project endorsed by our board as well as Council is the Beacons Field Synthetic Turf Renewal. This project reflects our focus on maximizing the use of existing park spaces in response to growing demand for sport facilities. The project replaces an existing gravel field with a modern synthetic turf field that can accommodate approximately four times the play of an existing natural turf field. Once complete, the field is expected to provide up to 3,000 additional permit hours to our system, helping address ongoing demand for quality playing surfaces. The location, well-suited for this investment because it's close to transit and complements existing sports facilities in the area.

Clerk 17:30:12

Project budget is $8.4 million, with construction expected in 2028 and 2029. And finally, highlighting another joint project between Park Board and Engineering, Columbia Park, which is an excellent example of a one-city approach to investment. It supports multiple objectives at once, accommodating population growth, improving park services, enhancing climate resilience, upgrading infrastructure, and strengthening neighborhood connectivity. The project combines several community benefits in a single initiative, including a new synthetic turf field, a renewed playground, a new washroom, and the Alberta Blue Greenway system. A unique feature of this project is the integration of an underground stormwater infrastructure with park improvements, allowing us to use limited urban space more efficiently while delivering benefits across our department. project budget for park improvements is roughly $10 million, and we expect this to start in 2028 and potentially be complete by 2030. This project illustrates how parks can contribute to a broader city goal while contributing high-quality recreational amenities. I'm happy to share the mic now with Margaret Witkins of ACCS.

Thank you.

Great. Arts, culture, and heritage includes cultural centers, entertainment and exhibition facilities, theaters, performance spaces, public arts, and heritage. These facilities help create the vibrancy of the city and shape its character and expression.

The 2023 to 2026 capital plan delivered a number of key projects within this area. This included the renewal and expansion of the Peony Amphitheater, a new covered multi-use outdoor venue with a 10,000 person capacity. It also included delivery of temporary and permanent public artworks and ongoing maintenance and restoration of existing artworks. CULTURAL SPACES GRANTS SUPPORTED APPROXIMATELY 150 PROJECTS ACROSS CITY-OWNED AND COMMUNITY CULTURAL SPACES, INCLUDING UPGRADES TO GALLERIES, THEATERS, AND ARTIST STUDIOS. NOTABLY, CAPITOL GRANTS SUPPORTED COUNCIL PRIORITIES RELATED TO CULTURAL REDRESS, INCLUDING RENOVATION TO THE CHINESE-CANADIAN MUSEUM, THE JOY KAGAWA HOUSE, AND THE FUTURE JAPANESE-CANADIAN HASTINGS PARK INTERPRETIVE CENTER.

Looking ahead to the 2027 to 2030 capital plan, there's a focus on maintenance and renewal of existing facilities, including major renovation and enhancements of the historic Fire Hall Arts Theater with an emphasis on accessibility and functionality. Improvements related to accessibility and functionality will also be advanced at the Vancouver Civic Theatres. Cultural grants will support city-owned and non-city-owned cultural spaces and cultural redress priorities.

Clerk 17:33:16

And there will be continued advancement of the public art program, including permanent and temporary artworks and maintaining and restoring existing artworks. A highlight is the Fire Hall Arts Center Renewal. This builds on council direction from the midterm capital update. The Fire Hall Arts Center Renewal is a priority project focused on accessibility and functional upgrades. It's a 12,000 square foot facility with 140 seats and a city-owned heritage facility that hosts over 200 events a year and serves around 35,000 attendees. with a strong focus on equity, disability, and Indigenous programming. This project will deliver critical renewal and functional upgrades, including elevator entrances, washrooms, as well as life safety improvements, removing barriers for audiences, artists, and staff, with delivery targeted by Q1 2029. I will now pass to my colleague, Chief Frye.

Good afternoon, Karen Fry, Fire Chief and General Manager for Vancouver Fire Rescue Services. Firstly, I'd like to thank each and every one of you. This will be my last presentation to you, Council, before I transition into retirement. Sorry, Donnie. We have accomplished so much in our term, and I can't tell you how much your support has meant to not only me, but to our entire department. Our city and our firefighters are safer because of you and your support for public safety. So with that support, it doesn't end when I leave. We move towards the next capital plan, and I will present on public safety, which includes VPD, VFRS, and the animal shelter. While I'm standing here today, I'd like to acknowledge my colleague, Chief Rye, with an R, who will be here to answer any questions that you have towards the VPD portion of the capital plan. So Vancouver Police and Fire have been protecting our beautiful city of Vancouver for over 140 years this year. Currently, VPD has five primary and 10 secondary police facilities and approximately 500 vehicles and equipment, while our Vancouver Fire Rescue Services has 19 fire halls strategically located throughout our city and five specialty facilities with approximately 150 vehicles and equipment. The city also has one animal control shelter and eight vehicles and equipment.

So the delivery of the last capital plan will see an allocated $144 million spend at the end of this year. Some of the biggest projects include our renewal and expansion of the downtown South Fire Hall 8. Due to be completed in 2029, it is a fire hall with social housing high-rise and daycare.

Clerk 17:36:19

Additionally, the renewal and expansion of our Grandview Fire Hall 9 is currently in the planning and redesign phase after a re-scope, and construction will begin this year. Finally, the animal shelter is under redevelopment that will see a 12,000 square foot purpose-built shelter beginning this year and completion expected in 2028.

For the 2027 to 2030 capital plan, we are requesting $205 million for our key projects and programs, and this will include a new fire hall 2 to be built at 422 to 496 Alexander Street, replacing the existing one at Main and Powell. Fire Hall 1 seismic upgrade. Fire Hall 1 currently is a working fire hall, our administration offices, and our fleet mechanic shop. The upgraded seismic standards will ensure that our firefighters will be in a better position to respond to our city when an earthquake hits. Additionally, we will also be including an upgraded HVAC system that will add much-needed cooling capacity to the building. For my partners and our partners at Vancouver Police, a $37.4 million investment in technology to support the operational needs of technology, infrastructure evergreening, computer hardware replacement, HR modernization, Also to maintain them to a modern policing capabilities with key investments in public safety, CCTV cameras, automated license plate recognition technology, drone as a first responder capabilities, which also have really helped our fire department during a lot of our large fires, and real-time integrated technology. So let me tell you about, as a key highlight here, a little bit about Fire Hall 2 at 422 and 496 Alexander Street. For those of you who haven't been in the existing one, to say that it is underbuilt for today's environment would be kind. We are busting at the seams. This fire hall, new fire hall, will be built in tandem with Fire Hall 9. Some of the key outcomes will be floor bays, which will allow all current apparatus to be parked inside and respond from inside. It will be built to the most up-to-date post-disaster requirements, and it will keep our firefighters safe. It will have upgraded ventilation, decontamination, and respite.

For both police and fire, We are looking for investments that will include renewal of our aging vehicles, 240 police cars, which include a marine unit and a modest 26 vehicles for growth. 50 vehicles, equipment for fire replacement, and an additional six apparatus for growth and surge capacity. With our last growth plan, we took out of our reserves, and so we are very limited right now in our ability to increase our staffing levels when needed for large events.

Clerk 17:39:29

Finally, police looking for $5 million for facilities that will support their ongoing lifecycle renovations and replacements over their building infrastructure. And with that, I will turn it over to my colleague, Craig Crawford.

OKAY. GOT IT. GOT THAT ARROWS WORKING. GREAT. GOOD AFTERNOON MAYOR AND COUNCIL. I'LL BE SPEAKING ON THE COMMUNITY FACILITIES AND CIVIC FACILITIES SERVICE CATEGORIES OF THE CAPITAL PLAN. COMMUNITY FACILITIES ASSET CLASS INCLUDES A BROAD RANGE OF PUBLIC FACING USES INCLUDING LIBRARIES, COMMUNITY CENTERS, REC CENTERS, POOLS, ICE RINKS AND CHILDCARE SPACES.

Looking back at the 2023-26 capital plan, some of the highlights that have been delivered include the Sunset Senior Center that recently opened, the Marpole Community Center that is just nearing completion right now. Two library upgrades and expansions are currently in progress. A community economic hub is currently under construction at 525 Powell. That's an indoor space for street vendors and is part of a social housing development. AS WELL, THE NEW VANCOUVER AQUATIC CENTER IS SCHEDULED TO START CONSTRUCTION BY THE END OF 2026.

As well in 2023-26 capital plan, there's a number of child care projects that have been delivered for, including David Lord George, Eric Hamber, Henry Hudson, and Sam Stone. That's a total of 282 that are complete, and another 65 are coming online when the Coal Harbor project is completed, which is currently wrapping up.

MOVING ON TO THE 2730 CAPITAL PLAN FOR THESE COMMUNITY FACILITIES ASSET CLASS. WE HAVE A COMMUNITY CENTER RENEWAL PROGRAM IN ALIGNMENT WITH THE 2730 CAPITAL PLAN FOCUS ON RENEWAL AND REPLACEMENT. the city's aging assets as well we're going to continue to modernize the city's libraries with a focus on the main library and as well we're looking forward to delivery of up to 160 more child care spaces these will be in-kind amenities delivered through private developers

Moving on to civic facilities and equipment, the civic facilities asset class includes a range of administrative buildings and service yard infrastructure. In 23-26, one of the key highlights was delivered was Sunset Yards Operations Center.

Clerk 17:42:37

It was completed earlier this year in April of 2026. and as well a very comprehensive capital maintenance and renovation program. That capital maintenance and renovation program includes a broad range of essential upgrades and renewals, includes accessibility upgrades, seismic strategic energy management, and specifically the ammonia charge reduction, which is an ongoing program. Just a couple of things this maintenance renovation program was able to fund was the urgent kids pool repairs and upgrading the rinks at Britannia and the agrodome.

Some of the key projects and programs under the 2730 Civic Facilities Program, including the next phase of upgrading the Sunset Yards facility. That's an ongoing project that has several phases based on a master plan that was developed a couple years ago. We're going to upgrade the Manitoba Yards by building two new operations buildings and continue our capital maintenance and renovation program delivery.

I want to highlight the Manitoba Yards Operations buildings. These designs of these buildings will be based on the Sunset Yards project, so we will save some design time and overall project delivery time by replicating a design of a successful project. It's going to create improved working conditions for staff. It's going to create a more efficient use of the site and be seismic resilient with some post-disaster capacity and reduced operating costs. These buildings, the Sunset Yards building was built to a passive house standard, so it should have excellent energy efficiency going forward. That's the end of my presentation, and I'm going to invite Josh up to talk about seismic and climate resilience.

THANK YOU, COUNCIL. I'LL COVER AREAS OF CLIMATE AND SEISMIC RESILIENCE WHICH HAVE BEEN BUCKETED TOGETHER HERE. IT INCLUDES INVESTMENTS SUPPORTING CLIMATE OBJECTIVES FOR THE CITY INCLUDING BUILDING EFFICIENCY, INNOVATION AND COOLING, PUBLIC EV CHARGING NETWORK AND CLIMATE ADAPTATION INITIATIVES ALONG WITH SEISMIC SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS IN BUILDINGS.

THIS SLIDE SPEAKS TO THE AREAS OF INVESTMENT IN THE 2023-26 CAPITAL PLAN.

FOR THIS UPCOMING CAPITAL PLAN, THERE ARE FOUR GENERAL AREAS OF PROPOSED INVESTMENT. FIRST IS CLIMATE ADAPTATION. INVESTMENTS INCLUDE THE FIRST PHASE OF STILL CREEK RESTORATION, WHICH IS A FEATURE OF THE RUPERT RENFROE PLAN IMPLEMENTATION. THIS IS FOR $7 MILLION. WE'RE ALSO CONTINUING PROGRAMS FOR EXTREME HEAT SAFETY FOR VULNERABLE RESIDENTS, UP TO 1500 UNITS.

Clerk 17:45:39

SECOND, WE HAVE BUILDING EFFICIENCY INNOVATION AND COOLING, INCLUDING FOR POLICY REGULATORY INCENTIVES AND INDUSTRY SUPPORT TO ENABLE MASS TIMBER PREFAB CONSTRUCTION AND CONTINUED STREAMLINING OF ELECTRICAL CONNECTIONS. THIRD, WE HAVE EV CHARGING. PUBLIC EV CHARGING INVESTMENT WHICH INCLUDES LEVERAGING EXISTING FEDERAL AND B.C. HYDRO PROGRAMS. THIS IS IN ADDITION TO PARKS PARKING FAST CHARGING AND THIRD PARTY CURBSIDE CHARGING WHICH WE HAVE RECENTLY OPENED UP. FOURTH, WE HAVE SEISMIC IMPROVEMENTS. THIS INCLUDES THE SEISMIC INVENTORY OF VANCOUVER'S BUILDING STOCKS, A KEY PART OF THE SEISMIC STRATEGY YOU RECENTLY PASSED, AND SOME PILOT RETROFIT PROGRAMS ON CITY-OWNED BUILDINGS. AND FOR CLARITY, THAT IS THE $1.3 MILLION ALLOCATION ROUNDED TO $1 MILLION. NOTABLY, ALIGNED WITH OUR CORPORATE APPROACH ON CLIMATE RESILIENCE AND SEISMIC RESILIENCE, VARIOUS CITY FACILITIES AND ASSETS INCLUDE UPGRADES AS PART OF CAPITAL PROJECTS TO INCLUDE RESILIENCE, SOME OF WHICH MY COLLEAGUES HIGHLIGHTED, INCLUDING CRAIG WITH MANITOBA AND SUNSET YARDS. CHIEF FRYE WITH FIRE HALL ONE AND ANOTHER EXAMPLE, COLUMBIA PARK UPGRADES WHICH INCLUDE FLOOD RESILIENCE AS PART OF THE PROJECT STEVE HIGHLIGHTED. AND NOW I'LL PASS IT BACK TO LAWN.

GM Engineering back again. Now to speak about this category, which is all things water. This category includes drinking water, rainwater, and wastewater. Ultimately, the assets included in this group include thousands of kilometers of pipes, meters, pumps, hydrants, valves. A lot of this equipment is largely hidden from view, but is essential to service residents and businesses across the city. In this capital plan, we've delivered or about to finish delivering 25 kilometers of sewer renewal, 40 kilometers of water pipe renewal, four renewed pump stations, and 7,000 water meters on properties that were previously unmetered. In addition to that, we've delivered green rainwater for infrastructure and flood management in key locations across the city. If you look at the next capital plan, we will be ramping up sewer renewal. So we're planning for 32 kilometers of sewer main renewal, continuing water main renewal, another four renewed pump stations, and in addition, some significant investment in green infrastructure, including some of the projects that were already mentioned, Columbia Park, Still Creek, Hastings Sunrise, and Mount Pleasant.

Generally, the pipes in this system, they last about 100 years and a lot of them are coming due for replacement because a lot of our city was built about 100 years ago.

Clerk 17:48:52

The ongoing goal is to renew it about 1% a year so that you do have kind of an ongoing forever replacement project, so to speak. In addition to that, because it's an ongoing forever project, we are also transitioning the way we fund it. So if you look at the funding strategy for sewers here, you can see that we're about equal on debenture and pay-as-you-go as we transition to pay-as-you-go. For water, we are already at the pay-as-you-go rate, so the great news for the water renewals work that's underway is that there is no ongoing borrowing costs because the fees that we collect that year for water help pay for the renewal.

In addition into the next capital plan in response to council direction, we're ramping up our metering of unmetered properties. So last in this capital plan, we've delivered 7,000 new water meters. In the next capital plan, we're planning on doubling that to 14,000 water meters on existing unmetered water properties. I will also talk to the next category, which is waste and energy utility. In this category, we have the region's only landfill. Of course, this is Vancouver-owned and operated landfill, but we do receive waste from all the cities across the region. We also have our own transfer station for solid waste at Manitoba Yard. We have two recycling centers, and then we have a host of equipment that's related to sanitation, including sweeper trucks and waste pickup trucks. In addition to that, of course, we operate our own neighborhood energy utility.

As part of this capital plan, there's a lot of obligation that comes with managing a landfill in terms of progressive closure, managing leachate and stormwater, but also capturing the gas that comes off of the landfill. And we've been very successful at being able to repurpose that gas as renewable natural gas. Also, our neighborhood energy system expands as development around that area that it serves expands.

In the next capital plan at the landfill, we will be continuing to do the ongoing stewardship of that site. In addition to the usual leachate gas and stormwater management, we're also going to be investing in renewal of the way stations and the stormwater management system. In addition, the neighborhood energy utility will continue to expand as consumer demand expands in the area.

The landfill, both of these as utilities, are kind of funded by users.

Clerk 17:51:56

And so the work that happens at the landfill, in terms of its funding strategy, it's generally all pay-as-you-go with some partner funding from Metro Vancouver.

And with that, I'll turn it over to Tag.

Clerk 17:52:15

Thank you, Lon. So behind so many of the modern services that a city provides for its residents are technology. So the asset class in terms of technology services that supports the delivery of those public services includes about 6,500 computers and laptops, 850 infrastructure components, so I think servers and network switches. We maintain over 400 software applications to deliver those services. Uniquely for a city of our size, we have 300 plus kilometers of fiber optic cable, which allows us to connect our city facilities and increase our resiliency. And then we have AV setups both in city council chambers as well as in the park board chambers. In terms of the current capital plan, we will have delivered approximately $135 million of value over the course of the last four years. The majority of this is in the maintenance of our core IT infrastructure. We implemented a new data center to move out of our city hall data center. We extended and renewed about 80 kilometers of that fiber optic network that I mentioned, as well as ensuring that we're replacing the client hardware that our staff use over the course of the capital plan. We've also modernized many of our core city internal processes, for example, our financial planning transformation and our human resources information system, which just went live recently. In partnership with DBL, we've focused and invested heavily in digital transformation around our permitting and licensing, resulting in positive outcomes for both staff and customers alike, reduced wait times, and improved service delivery. So together, these investments have strengthened our technology foundation, improved service delivery, and created many of the capabilities that support our ongoing digital transformation efforts. In terms of the next capital plan, you'll see a consistent theme, again, with the majority of the investment on our infrastructure and core foundational technology. So think about our renewal lifecycle for the end-user computing devices across City of Vancouver, VPD, and VPL. We're also going to increase the amount dedicated towards cybersecurity to ensure that we're protecting the vast amount of data that we hold both around city business and operations, as well as our citizens. We'll continue to invest in our digital transformation program, modernizing and digitizing permitting and licensing services, and then leveraging that investment across a range of other services. In terms of that core technology foundation, the investment will be used to sustain and modernize our foundational technology infrastructure, as well as the deployment of enhanced cybersecurity platforms, tools, and governance capabilities. We'll move the average computing device replacement to approximately five years, and we expect that the majority of that funding will be in that area. Other examples include Council AV modernization, upgrade of our 311 contact center, various database upgrades, as well as security monitoring and response services. In terms of technology modernization, we'll continue to create those foundational capabilities across departments that will improve efficiency, user experience, and service integration.

Clerk 17:55:21

So things like case management, enterprise payments, and identity, things that you invest in once and can use across multiple service areas. We'll also address technical debt, replacing end-of-life systems, enhancing performance, functionality, and integration between those systems. And with that, I'll hand it over to Ryan Bigelow. Thank you.

Afternoon, Council. Ryan Bigelow, Managing Director of Non-Market Housing Development and Operations. I'm going to go over the housing service category. So the city has over 250 sites that support a variety of housing, including shelters, SROs, non-profit and co-op housing, and market rental housing. The city directly owns and operates just over 1,000 SRO and social housing units, as well as a handful of market rental units. The city also acquires and holds land for future housing development. Notably, the city's housing assets are just part of a larger housing system, and most of the housing assets in Vancouver are partner-owned. So to support the preservation and growth of this partner housing, we provide capital grants.

SOME ANIMATIONS HERE, BUT I'LL SKIP OVER THAT. SO FOR THE 23 TO 26 CAPITAL PLAN, INCLUDED 675 MILLION TOWARDS HOUSING, 340 MILLION WAS CITY LED AND 335 MILLION RELATED TO IN-KIND ASSETS WE OBTAINED FROM DEVELOPERS. Notably, towards the end of the capital plan period, many senior government funding programs were wound down, as well as we saw a softening of the housing market. But despite these headwinds, the city and its non-profit delivery partners have leveraged over $1 billion in senior government funding and financing for housing development on city land during this capital plan, which is significant. But we don't expect the same in this upcoming capital plan. While 2026 has been filled with uncertainty for new housing developments, we intend to utilize all the funding in the 2023 to 2026 capital plan. Some highlights. Most of the housing capital went towards acquisitions of land for future housing development. We acquired or transferred 10 sites, which once developed will deliver over 900 homes. And we have additional acquisitions anticipated throughout the rest of 2026. We funded significant pre-development activities at a cost of $40 million, much of which will be recoverable when those projects proceed to construction. This helped initiate or advance 24 projects closer to construction, and once developed, these will deliver over 3,000 homes. Council also approved $30 million in capital grants for six projects to non-profits developing on their own land. Most of these started construction or will start construction shortly and tally up to about 800 homes. Lastly, we replaced 30 city-owned SRO rooms and provided a number of SRO grants, improving the livability of 480 non-city-owned SRO rooms.

Is there a seconder? Councillor Orr? Okay. Any discussion? Councillor Kirby-Young?

Is there any discussion?

Sure. I'm sorry, I'm just going to advance here. Councillor Meiszner?

Thank you. I just, Mayor, if you could inform me how many slides are left in the presentation, or if the clerks could let Council know. Sorry, can you repeat that? I just want to know how many slides are left in the presentation.

12 slides.

12? Okay, thank you.

Clerk 17:59:14

Just 13 slides to present.

And roughly how much time would that be?

Clerk 17:59:19

I think roughly 10 more minutes.

Any other discussion? Council?

Okay. All those in favor say yay. All those opposed say nay.

Sorry, clerk, how many do we have to have to the simple majority? Two thirds. Okay. It looks like that was two thirds. So we will extend to here.

the end of the presentation. Thank you.

Clerk 17:59:52

Okay, I'll talk a lot faster. For 27 to 30, limited senior government funding and the softening of housing market conditions are anticipated to continue and will have a significant impact on the delivery of new affordable housing in Vancouver. So the proposed plan includes $176 million towards housing, $104 million will be city-led, and these investment levels align with the anticipated conditions. So nearly all of the city-led plan will be funded by the empty homes tax at $88 million. So how are we going to use this $104 million of city-led capital? $75 will go towards acquisitions, SRO replacement, and development. We anticipate acquisitions of land and building to deliver approximately 210 affordable homes and to plan and initiate 10 new development projects with our pre-development capital. To make our housing dollars stretch and deliver more affordable housing, we will leverage senior government funding where it's available, but we also will explore alternative funding approaches where it's not. While acquisition funding is lower in this capital plan, greater emphasis is being put on redevelopment of existing city lands, which will help the city continue to progress its housing goals and targets. Capital maintenance is the next largest program at $17 million to preserve our existing housing stock, and we'll spread that across nine buildings and 771 units. Housing capital grants are the third largest program at $10 million to help nonprofits deliver affordable housing on their own sites. The grants are meant to complement senior government funding programs, not replace them, so we're earmarking funding for roughly two to three projects.

Just to illustrate some investments from the capital plan, I wanted to highlight two items that are advancing our housing goals on city land. First is the acquisition of an assembly on Renfrew Street and the future redevelopment of a nearby city-owned site that's underutilized. This acquisition was completed last year, and we're planning the development of the site to replace and expand co-op housing. Once developed, a nearby city-owned site can be unlocked for further development. Overall, this pocket of sites could deliver roughly eight times more housing than what exists today and demonstrates the magnitude of additional housing we can create on city land that we already own. LASTLY, I WANTED TO PROVIDE SOME GREATER EMPHASIS ON OUR ASSET PRESERVATION EFFORTS. SO I WANTED TO HIGHLIGHT ONE OF OUR BUILDINGS WHERE CAPITAL MAINTENANCE DOLLARS ARE GOING. 1067 SEYMOUR, CITY OWNED AND OPERATED BUILDING, PROVIDED AFFORDABLE HOUSING TO 110 RESIDENTS, PRIMARILY SENIORS. BUILDING WAS CONSTRUCTED IN 1991. SO IT'S NOT REALLY A NEW BUILDING BUT HAS MANY YEARS LEFT IN IT IF IT'S PROPERLY MAINTAINED. SO THROUGH THIS CAPITAL PLAN, WE INTEND TO COMPLETE MAINTENANCE AND REPLACEMENT OF KEY BUILDING SYSTEMS TO CONTINUE PROVIDING AFFORDABLE AND LIVABLE HOUSING HERE. So that's it for housing. I'm going to pass you over to Alicia McCallum to summarize some of our engagement through the capital plan. Perfect. Thank you, Ryan. Good afternoon, Mayor and Council. I'm Alicia McCallum, the Chief of External Relations, and I'm pleased to present you the results of our 2027 to 2030 capital plan engagement process. And in contrast to my colleague, Chief Fry, who did a great job of holding it together this afternoon, this marks my first time presenting in Council Chambers today.

Clerk 18:02:54

I'd like to start off by talking about the capital plan engagement background and objectives. We had more than two weeks from May 22nd to June 7th, and that gave people time to learn about the capital plan and share their input. We asked for input on specifically capital investment priorities, how the city manages infrastructure, financial strategies for capital planning. And the results are a snapshot of public priorities, and we want to remind everyone that should be considered alongside asset condition, service needs, financial capacity, and, of course, council direction. So in terms of how we engaged and who we heard from, we used online and in-person tactics to reach those who were interested or impacted. And that included a survey in seven languages, 10 pop-up events. We issued postcards. We did an email outreach. We circulated posters. And we had a social media campaign. In total, we heard from approximately 500 people in person, 4,265 online survey responses from residents, businesses, and community organizations. And that survey was open to anyone who chose to participate. So the results are a snapshot of participant priorities, not statistically representative as a sample of Vancouver.

In terms of the profile of survey respondents, we heard from a broad range of people across the city. The survey respondents included people living in different neighborhoods from different age groups. Business owners, sorry. I've never had a problem with projection. I don't think anybody, I think we've gathered that, yeah. People from different age groups, business owners and operators, and people connected to community organizations serving Vancouver. Respondents were a mix of homeowners, renters, people in different housing situations. About half of those respondents were homeowners. Nearly one quarter of those respondents lived in households with children under 18, and the results were weighted to match census data on age, gender, geographic region, and among those residents. In terms of the priorities for the capital plan investments, I'd like to give you now an overview of the respondents' priorities for investments. Respondents were asked to rate the importance of the 12 capital plan investment categories. Overall, the results show a strong interest in core infrastructure, transportation, community facilities, parks, and recreation. These priorities generally align with council direction, including increased investment in roads and sidewalks and renewal replacement of major recreation facilities. In the online survey, water, sewers, and drainage was the highest rated category, with 97% of respondents saying it was either very or fairly important. Other top categories included transportation and streets, community facilities, and parks and open spaces, waste collection and diversion and disposal. At the in-person pop-ups, participants identified housing as the top priority, followed by community facilities, transportation and streets, parks and open spaces, and child care.

When asked about transportation and street improvements, respondents prioritized protected bikeways and cycling connections, pedestrian safety, transit-supported street improvements.

Clerk 18:06:00

In terms of parks, open spaces, and related amenities, recreation facilities were the top priority, followed by park buildings and infrastructure, park renewals and amenity upgrades, urban forest and natural areas, and seawall and the waterfront. And in terms of top priorities for community center spaces, this slide will show you the top priorities for residents living near the five community centers identified by council for renewal or replacement. Across those five locations, amongst the strongest priorities for facilities were the fitness facilities, pools, libraries, or learning commons. Overall, the results show a strong interest in renewing these facilities to support recreation, wellness, learning, and flexible community use. In closing, I'd like to acknowledge and thank our public engagement team for their expertise and professionalism throughout this process, and I will ask Colin to return to the podium to wrap up our presentation.

THANK YOU. I'LL WRAP UP THE PRESENTATION WITH JUST A SUMMARY OF WHERE WE ARE IN THE PROCESS. AGAIN, THIS IS A KEY STAGE IN THE PROCESS FOR GETTING COUNCIL'S APPROVAL OF THE CAPITAL PLAN THAT WILL INFORM THE ELECTORATE APPROVAL OF THE BORROWING ON OCTOBER 17TH. And further, I'd just again like to acknowledge the work of many staff in the departments represented here for their work assembling this. And with that, I'll conclude the presentation. Thank you.

Great. Thank you very much.

That was a very comprehensive presentation. So thank you, everyone, for all the work that you put into it. Okay, can we please have a motion to recess until Thursday, July the 6th? No, we don't need a motion. Perfect. All right.

We are recessing until Thursday, July 16th, 2026 at 1 p.m. In the council chamber and online. Thank you very much.

Thank you.