Peanut Gallery Vancouver City Council
| | Est. 12,026 HE | |

VGH Campus Broadway Plan Policy Update

Motion 14 · Council Meeting, July 14, 2026

Carried Location 818-990 West 10th Avenue and 803-899 West 12th Avenue Moved by Sarah Kirby-Yung Watch recording

Summary

  • Council approved a new policy framework — the VGH Campus Broadway Plan Policy Appendix — to guide the redevelopment of the Vancouver General Hospital campus over the next 30+ years, replacing outdated 2000 and 2006 policy documents.
  • The VGH Campus covers 19.8 hectares in the Fairview neighbourhood, bounded roughly by Broadway, 13th Avenue, Oak Street, and Ash Street, and is owned primarily by Vancouver Coastal Health Authority (VCH).
  • The current zoning limits the campus to a floor space ratio of 2.6, which is no longer sufficient to support the modernization and expansion needed for VGH to function as BC's largest hospital and a provincial referral, teaching, and research centre.
  • The new Policy Appendix addresses land use, density, height, built form, public open space, heritage conservation (including the protected 1906 Heather Pavilion), transportation, sustainability, public benefits, and phased development.
  • The policy update aligns with the Broadway Plan (2022), the Broadway Public Realm Plan (2024), and the City's UNDRIP commitments, which require engagement with Musqueam, Squamish, and Tsleil-Waututh Nations in major planning decisions.
  • The policy applies only to VCH-owned lands; other sites within the broader FUCB Policy Area (e.g., BC Cancer Centre, Medi-tech institutions) will be addressed through future individual rezoning applications.

Report Images

Vote

Public comments

👍 In support 👎 Opposed 💬 Neutral / information
Read all 10 statements
Andrea Bizayon Vancouver General Hospital · Operations Director support

Statement Watch

Good afternoon Mayor and Council. My name is Andrea Bizayon and I'm an operations director at Vancouver General Hospital and a registered nurse by background. I am not a resident of Vancouver. Thank you for the opportunity to speak to the Vancouver General Hospital campus rezoning plans from the lands of the Coast Salish people, the Musqueam, Squamish, and TTsleil-Waututh nations. As a longstanding employee of Vancouver General Hospital, I'd like to express my strong support for this application and the future vision it sets out for the campus. The proposed rezoning is essential to supporting the continued advancement of patient care through innovation, modernization, and the ability to recruit and retain highly skilled and diverse health care workforce. As health care delivery continues to evolve, it's critical that the physical environment of our hospital campus enables us to deliver safe, contemporary, and culturally responsive care for the communities we serve. I'm aware that some members of the community have advocated for the preservation of the Heather Pavilion due to its historical significance and its role in education and learning. As a graduate of the Vancouver General Hospital School of Nursing class of February 1987, I have deep personal and professional connections to the campus and completed many clinical rotations within the Heather Pavilion, including D8-9, A5, C5, and others. However, I can say with confidence that my most meaningful learning experiences were not defined by the building itself. They were shaped by the mentors who guided me, the teachers who challenged me, and more importantly, the patients and families who entrusted me with their care. It's these human connections rather than the bricks and mortar that form the true legacy of learning at BGH. As I continue my own journey in reconciliation, I believe it's important to thoroughly consider what our physical spaces represent. In this context, I support the removal of outdated infrastructure and the opportunity to replace it with facilities that more clearly acknowledge the complex histories of healthcare delivery, including the experiences of our Indigenous patients. New development should intentionally support Indigenous-led culturally safe and culturally responsive models of care while also advancing medical excellence and innovation. Replacing aging structures with purpose-built facilities that reflect these values is an important step towards reconciliation and towards creating a healthcare environment that's inclusive, respectful, and forward-thinking. Thank you again for the opportunity to provide input to this important initiative and for considering the perspectives of those that have dedicated their career to serving patients and the broader community at Vancouver General Hospital. Thank you.

Philip Sweeney Vancouver Coastal Health / GF Strong and Ambulatory Care at VGH · Operations Director support

Statement Watch

Good morning, Mayor and Councillors. My name is Philip Sweeney. I am a resident of Vancouver. I am also an Operations Director for GF Strong and Ambulatory Care at VGH, working for Vancouver Coastal Health. Thank you for the opportunity to speak to the Vancouver General Hospital's campus rezoning plan and the lands of the Coast Salish peoples, the Musqueam, Squamish, and TTsleil-Waututh nations. As a longstanding employee of VGH, I would like to express my strong support for this application and for the future vision it sets out for the campus. I also believe that the proposed rezoning is essential for the ongoing advancement of patient care, allowing us to continue to innovate and modernize our services for decades to come. This work will further support our ability to recruit and retain our ever-growing, highly skilled, diverse healthcare team. It is crucial that the physical environment of our hospital campus facilitates public safety externally while continuing the evolution of providing culturally safe, contemporary, and responsive care for the communities we serve. I am speaking today about my experience, not as an operations director of VCH, but rather as an avid cyclist and commuter, having commuted to and from VGH by bike for the last 18 years, using Vancouver's usually excellent cycle pathway network. My concerns relate specifically to the cycle pathways along 10th Avenue, which run through the northern edge of the proposed rezoning plan. The section of 10th Avenue bike route from Oak to Heather is, to be frank, extremely dangerous and very scary. I actually avoid it at all costs. The current setup puts cyclists in harm's way seven times between Oak and Heather when you're heading east. The intersection at Laurel Street, two entrances to emergency, the loading bay for the Jim Patterson Pavilion, the loading bay exit and the thoroughfare for the Leon Blackmore Pavilion. and the parking lot between Blue Sun and the Old Heather Pavilion. These are all high-risk areas for cycle-versus-car or cycle-versus-pedestrian incidents. To highlight the magnitude of this issue, in addition to what we heard this morning, I have seen ambulances have to wait for cyclists to zip by before being able to enter the VGH emergency area ambulance bay. Westbound cyclists only has three potential issues in comparison. I am also a pedestrian who regularly crosses 10th Avenue to check in my programs on the north side of 10th Ave. It is just as dangerous. Cyclists, e-scooters, e-bikes are careening along the bike path, weaving in and out as they follow the path. For an analogy, it's like playing a real-life game of Frogger, trying to avoid all the vehicles, bikes, and scooters crossing 10th Avenue, only with no second chances. The buildings on the north side of 10th Avenue care for patients with vision impairment and arthritis. Many of these patients park in the VGH parkade on 12th Avenue, and then they walk over to their appointments. This population has difficulty navigating fast-moving objects and slow reaction times. So unfortunately, it's an accident waiting to happen. I strongly encourage the City of Vancouver to consider revising the 10th Avenue cycle route to put both of the east and west on the north side. Thank you very much for considering my input.

Anthony Norfolk Resident oppose

Statement Watch

Excuse me. Too bad. I'll try not to get myself all choked up. I don't know why.

Oh. I wasn't speaking, so I didn't know that I was in need. My apologies. Thank you. I've never done that before.

I'm being served by the mayor. Wonderful. My name's Anthony Norfolk. I live in Vancouver. I have, as my message to you all, which I hope you received, as you will gather, I have been involved in advocating for the Heather Pavilion for decades. But I think we need to start off with clearing up one misunderstanding. The Heather Pavilion is not designated. It is a portion, the original portion of the pavilion, the Fairview building, that is what has been designated. So when someone says that 40%, the Heather Pavilion takes up 40% of the site, of the VGH site, What are we talking about? What is 40% of what?

Because the much, much smaller Fairview building is what is in play here.

The staff report is correct in saying it's a portion of the Heather Pavilion. So let's start talking about the Fairview building. not the Heather Pavilion. So the Fairview building is not 40% of anything, let alone the fact that I suspect that 40% is wrong. Now, don't get me wrong. At the age of 84, I am a consumer of services from VGH, which I much appreciate. They are super. Absolutely. But I don't see why... the Fairview Pavilion, the Fairview building, has to go to achieve all that VGH would like to achieve. It is a minuscule portion of the site. Its value has been spoken to and passed on by previous council when designating it. That is rare. It's been through all the processes. And it may not have been used for care for a long time, but it is still occupied and used. I did precipitate the production for the city quite a while ago of a report by Richard Henriquez that lists the uses to which that building can be put ancillary uses to the broader uses of the hospital. There are, as someone this morning pointed out, there are examples where heritage buildings have been enclosed, enwrapped in larger buildings. There is absolutely no reason why the Fairview building cannot be treated in the same fashion. And in fact, Vancouver Coastal Health itself commissioned a report in detail about restoring the building. Detailed report.

I have it. I'm sure it's available to staff.

Because I certainly have Richard Henriquez's report here. You know, it's yay thick. There is no real valid reason for destroying a designated building. I don't know that it's ever been done. demolishing a designated heritage building. So when I look at the report, I'm simply asking you not to consider the repeal of the designation bylaw. Just simply refrain from supporting this part of the council report. That's my request.

Brianne LaPierre Vancouver Heritage Commission · Member (speaking in personal capacity) support

Statement Watch

Hello, Mayor and Council. My name is Brianne, and I'm speaking today in support of the Vancouver General Hospital Campus Renewal Project. I'm also a member of the Vancouver Heritage Commission, although I'm speaking today in my personal capacity. BGH is one of the most important public institutions in our province. Every day it serves not only Vancouver residents, but patients from across BC, and this proposal establishes a thoughtful, long-term framework to modernize and renew the campus over the coming decades. As a member of the Vancouver Heritage Commission, I know we all bring different perspectives on how to best support our city. We share a commitment to preserving Vancouver's history while ensuring it continues to evolve to meet the needs of future generations. When this project was brought to the commission, I advocated in support of this proposal because I believe heritage conservation and responsible city building goes hand in hand. Heritage is about more than preserving individual buildings. It is about preserving the stories and places that have shaped our city. The Heather Pavilion has served Vancouver with distinction for more than a century and its legacy deserves to be recognized. But we also have to be honest about the reality of the building today. The Heather Pavilion has not been used for patient care for more than 20 years and VCH has determined that its floor plans, circulation systems, and mechanical infrastructure are functionally obsolete. It was built in 1906 for a completely different era of medicine. At some point, preserving a building for its own sake began I believe our responsibility is to honor its history while ensuring VGH has a modern facility needed to save lives and provide patients and healthcare professionals with the standard of care they deserve. This proposal thoughtfully balances those objectives. It creates a pathway to replace modern aging healthcare infrastructure with modern facilities while improving accessibility, creating new open spaces, and strengthening climate resilience. The population is growing and health care demands are increasing, and facilities built decades ago need to be renewed to meet modern standards. This project does just that. The decision Council makes today will have an impact for generations, and I respectfully encourage Council to support this application. Thank you very much.

Elliot Klein Resident support

Statement Watch

yeah hi my name is ellie klein i'm a resident of east vancouver i live near uh and bike through the develop the general area of vgh pretty regularly once or twice a week um i strongly support this uh this motion i think that plan to modernize and replace any of these uh facilities is definitely beneficial given the growing health care demands that our city faces as it grows and as the population generally is aging And I think the part that I am most interested in is just the general revitalization of the campus area. Now, one thing I would just kind of want to draw some emphasis to, I've heard this brought up already a few times today, but I just wanted to get my own experiences as a cyclist regularly biking through West 10th. My experience heading West, not much of a problem. You're on the North side of the street and you're not generally interfering with any of the access the emergency or hospital spaces. But when I'm biking east on the south side, I'm constantly worried about kind of like crashing into or hitting anybody who's coming in and out of the hospital emergency areas. The biggest problem being is because the bike... lane heads downhill from the east side. So you're catching a lot of speed coming from Oak and you are heading down in the first building that you pass by on the south on the south bike lane is the emergency building or the emergency entrance. as well as other buildings that come up later on, and lots of pedestrian crosswalks. And this just does not really create a conducive environment for cycling, and it makes it more dangerous for any of the hospital services, emergency vehicles, even just people who are maybe walking out of the hospital, nurses who are leaving for break. It's just a dangerous environment. And so I've heard a lot of people propose something that I do believe also is a very good solution, is a bidirectional bike lane on the north side of 10th. I think that this would be beneficial because there's less general vehicle traffic coming in and out of properties on the north side, and also it creates less directions people need to look in when you've got the vehicle traffic traveling on that street. I know whenever I get to any intersection on my bike, you've got cars that are looking one way for the cars on the other way. They're looking for bikes coming from two directions on two sides of the street. It's just incredibly confusing. And I go through the 10th Avenue bikeway all the way out to Kitsilano, all the way out to Commercial. There are many parts of this bike lane that are bidirectional, and they work where the bidirectional is on one side of the street. It works very effectively. It's much safer, and it's a much more conducive way to bike. And I think that if we are looking to revitalize this area, I think that... reshaping and redesigning the bike lane to be bi-directional on the north side should be the main priority but apart from that i agree and support this development thank you very much speaking number seven daniel and then good afternoon mayor and council my name is daniel i'm not a resident of vancouver i reside on the uel and i'm here today to speak in support of the vgh campus renewal proposal thank you for your time TGH is one of the most important healthcare facilities in BC. It serves not only Vancouver residents, but patients from across the province who require specialized and lifesaving care. At the same time, our population is growing and aging. The healthcare infrastructure we rely on today was built for a different era. If we want our healthcare system to continue meeting the needs of future generations, we need to invest in modern facilities now, other than waiting until buildings become inadequate. According to the staff report, FGH campus buildings and infrastructure are aging, with 80% of inpatient beds located in facilities built between 1953 and 1989. Major infrastructure projects require thoughtful planning, but delaying renewal will only make future challenges more difficult and more expensive to address. I encourage council to support this renewal proposal so this essential hospital can continue providing world-class care for decades to come. Thank you very much for your time.

Neil Wiles Mount Pleasant Business Improvement Association support

Statement Watch

We can hear you great, Neil. Please go ahead.

excellent excellent thank you good afternoon mayor and council uh my name is neil wild i'm with the mount pleasant business improvement association i will do my best to be very very brief i'm here to speak in support of the amendments uh to the broadway plan with regards to the vancouver general hospital campus Sadly, I don't think it'll be the last time that we'll be looking for amendments to the Broadway plan. On the city's own website, Broadway plan states that the area can see up to 64,000 new residents and 45,000 additional jobs. We are in this area, and this area has already seen dramatic growth for the past decade. With that said, expanding services, especially in some of the aging facilities at VGH, seems only logical. The campus can only get as big as it can get because that's the size that it is. We do respect heritage aspects. We do respect them in our own neighbourhood, but I think sometimes the needs of the hospital and the greater community are going to outweigh that. With that said, we fully support this and look forward to seeing these changes over the next 40 years to help the community of Mount Pleasant. Thank you very much and have a great day.

Ken McDougall City of Vancouver Special Project Office

Statement Watch

Good morning, Mayor and Council. My name is Ken McDougall from the City's Special Project Office. I'm here to present the Vancouver General Hospital Broadway Plan updates. Shown here is an aerial photo highlighting generally the VGH area in red. The site is a large and unique site located in the Fairview neighborhood, and it's generally bounded by the lane between Broadway and 10th Avenue to the north, 13th Avenue to the south, Oak Street to the west, and Ass Street to the east. The VGH area is designated institutional in the Vancouver Official Development Plan, which are lands reserved for essential community-serving institutional uses such as major hospitals. VGH is located within the MetroCorp Broadway area, which is the principal center of business, employment, cultural, and entertainment activity in the city and region. Under the Broadway plan, the VGH institutional area includes broad policy direction to support the expansion of VGH to meet long-term institutional and health care needs. Current policy generally supports building heights up to 350 feet or up to the underside of the Queen Elizabeth Park view cone, and we're not restricted by helicopter flight paths. It seeks improved walking, rolling, and cycling connections, significant public open space, and active ground floor uses are strongly encouraged. Within the VGH institutional area, Vancouver General Hospital, through Vancouver Coastal Health Authority, or VCH, is the primary landowner. These lands constitute the VGH campus area and are the focus of the policy updates brought forward today. This is an aerial view of the campus as it currently exists. VGH has evolved into a nationally significant referral, teaching, and research hospital whose layered campus reflects more than a century of incremental growth. It remains the largest hospital in BC, providing acute and trauma care, serving as the provincial referral center for many adult programs and specialist services, while also acting as Vancouver's community hospital. Looking ahead, VGH finds itself at a critical juncture in the provision of provincial health care services. With a largely built out and landlocked site, new development requires the demolition of existing buildings to make space for new facilities. THESE NEW FACILITIES MUST BE OPERATIONAL BEFORE OLDER BUILDINGS CAN BE VACATED TO ENSURE CONTINUITY OF PATIENT CARE. VGH CAMPUS BUILDINGS AND INFRASTRUCTURE ARE AGING WITH 80% OF IMPATIENT BEDS LOCATED IN FACILITIES BUILT BETWEEN 1953 AND 1989. THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT BUILT IN THE MID-1970S IS TOO SMALL FOR CURRENT NEEDS. IMPATIENT AND EMERGENCY BED SHORTAGES CREATE DAILY OPERATIONAL CHALLENGES. WITH A GROWING AND AGING POPULATION IN VANCOUVER, THE REGION AND THE PROVINCE, DEMAND FOR HEALTH CARE SERVICES IS PROJECTED TO INCREASE BY 25% BY 2035, WITH EMERGENCY VOLUMES RISING WHILE AGING BUILDINGS AND LIMITED LAND RESTRICT EXPANSION AND MODERNIZATION. ACKNOWLEDGING THE CRITICAL ROLE THAT VGH PLAYS IN DELIVERING HEALTH CARE TO ALL BRITISH COLUMBIANS, THERE IS AN OVERWHELMING NEED TO EXPAND AND MODERNIZE HEALTH CARE FACILITIES AT THE CAMPUS AND REDEVELOPMENT IS A KEY PROVINCIAL, REGIONAL AND MUNICIPAL PRIORITY.

IN RESPONSE, ACHIEVING HEALTHCARE OBJECTIVES HAS BEEN A PRIMARY DRIVER OF THE CITY PLANNING PROCESSES AND STAFF ARE WORKING TOWARDS DEVELOPING A MORE FLEXIBLE FRAMEWORK OF POLICY AND ZONING THAT PRIORITIZES HEALTHCARE DELIVERY AT THE CAMPUS. An example of the flexible approach being taken, staff received a rezoning application for the VGH campus in fall of 2025. This application, as well as ongoing collaboration and discussion with VGH, led to three concurrent work streams being undertaken to assess and support VGH in the goal of modernization and expansion of the hospital. First is the development of site-specific policies to guide the long-term redevelopment of the VGH campus. These policies, in the form of Broadway plan updates, are the subject of this report. Second is a requested text amendment to the site's existing zoning to pursue a new emergency and inpatient care building along West 10th Avenue. This application was approved on consent earlier this morning. Finally, staff are assessing a VGH campus-wide rezoning application proposing long-term phased redevelopment to modernize and expand the hospital. This work is ongoing and would come forward in 2027. The VGH campus policy statement, which in the form of a Broadway plan appendix, is a long-term vision for the campus to enable renewal, growth, and modernization of healthcare facilities. It aims to provide a clear and robust framework of planning principles and design parameters while maintaining flexibility for VGH. Direction includes departures from past policies, approvals, and obligations in recognition of current challenges and future needs. I will now provide an overview of the proposed policy direction, highlighting key elements. STARTING WITH RECONCILIATION, WITH THE AIM TO FOSTER CULTURALLY SAFE AND WELCOMING ENVIRONMENTS THAT VISIBLY AND RESPECTFULLY REFLECTS LOCAL NATIONS' VALUES, HISTORIES, KNOWLEDGE, LANGUAGES AND ART, ENSURING THEIR PRESENCE AND PERSPECTIVES ARE EMBEDDED THROUGHOUT THE CAMPUS. KEY POLICY DIRECTION SEEKS OPPORTUNITIES TO COLLABORATE WITH LOCAL NATIONS ON CULTURAL VISIBILITY IN THE PUBLIC REALM AND OPEN SPACES. AS WELL, LOOKING FOR BUILDING DESIGN TO CONTRIBUTE TOWARDS CREATING CULTURALLY SAFE HEALTH CARE ENVIRONMENTS. In terms of land use and density, the policy promotes a mix of land uses and development density that supports and expands on the site's core healthcare functions with appropriate flexibility for the site to adapt to evolving service needs. Key policy direction includes flexible mix of healthcare-related land uses appropriate for a campus environment and for density to be determined through zoning based on healthcare requirements and the ability to achieve high-quality built form, site design, and open space outcomes. Policy includes direction on built form and site design to enable a coherent and high-performing health care environment that balances the complex functional requirements of a hospital campus with good urban design to improve the experience of patients, staff, visitors, and the broader community. Key policy direction includes accommodating large, efficient building forms for health care functionality while respecting protected public views and helicopter flight paths.

Policies promote a high-quality design leading to a more legible, coherent, and accessible campus with a strengthened public realm and improved integration with surroundings. One of the key areas of departure from past policies and approvals is for the approach to open space. Under existing approvals from the 2000s, the VGH campus is obligated to provide approximately nine acres of public open space, illustrated in the top right of this slide. Some portions of this concept have been implemented, including portions of an open space corridor along Willow Street, a plaza south of 12th Avenue. These examples are highlighted in the photos along the bottom. Space constraints on the campus and increased healthcare demands dictate a different approach with reduced open space requirements. THE KEY POLICY DIRECTIONS INCLUDE LOOKING TO ESTABLISH A CONNECTED OPEN SPACE NETWORK WITH A SYSTEM OF LINEAR CORRIDORS AND NODES BRINGING STRUCTURE TO THE CAMPUS. RATHER THAN THE EXISTING NINE ACRES OF PERMANENT OPEN SPACE EXPECTATION, THE NEW POLICY WOULD TARGET FOUR ACRES OF PERMANENT OPEN SPACE THROUGH LINEAR AND NOTAL SPACES. AS WELL THE POLICY SETS A TARGET FOR 30% OF THE CAMPUS AS PUBLIC OPEN SPACE THROUGH A MIX OF PERMANENT AND INTERIM SPACES THAT EVOLVE THROUGH PHASE DEVELOPMENT. The interim spaces would consist of large sites cleared for redevelopment, which are to be put into public use on an interim basis. The policy also looks to establish a continuous wellness walk circuit along streets and corridors linking buildings and open spaces. Another area of departure from existing obligations is regarding the approach to heritage. Through past approvals, portions of the Heather Pavilion, a building on site, are municipally designated and protected through a heritage revitalization agreement. However, the building has not been used for patient care in over 20 years and is functionally obsolete for modern health care uses. Retrofitting it to meet contemporary standards would be complex, prohibitively expensive, and suboptimal compared to new purpose-built facilities. Recognizing these challenges, plus growing healthcare demands and campus space constraints, the Heather Pavilion is proposed for demolition. In response, the proposed key policy directions look to establish a Heritage Conservation Management Plan to inform the future phased redevelopment of the VGH campus. This would enable consideration of interpretation as the primary conservation approach as an alternative to preservation and rehabilitation of the Heather Pavilion. The approach would include a review of existing heritage agreements, identifying modifications and council approvals needed for contemplated demolition. Proposed policy looks to advance substantive and meaningful strategies to commemorate the heritage value of the campus, including reuse of salvaged materials and heritage elements into new buildings and landscape. The VGH campus was presented to the City's Heritage Commission in March of this year, receiving support and principle for the redevelopment of the campus, subject to further work on conservation approaches for the Heather Pavilion.

The VGH campus policy statement contains guidance on transportation, looking to strengthen connections to and through the campus, supporting diverse mobility needs unique to a health care environment. KEY POLICY DIRECTION AIMS TO IMPROVE SAFETY AND COMFORT FOR ALL ROAD USERS, REDUCE CONFLICTS AND SIMPLIFY VEHICLE MOVEMENTS AND SUPPORT EFFICIENT HOSPITAL OPERATIONS, ENHANCE WALKING, CYCLING AND ROLLING THROUGH ACTIVE TRAVEL LANES SUCH AS THE TENTH AVENUE GREENWAY, SUPPORT FOR WIDER SIDEWALKS AND HIGH QUALITY PUBLIC REALM. THE POLICY ALSO SUPPORTS CLEAR WAYFINDING STRATEGIES AND STRENGTHENING INTERNAL CAMPUS CONNECTIONS. THE POLICY INCLUDES GUIDANCE RELATED TO SUSTAINABILITY AND RESILIENCE, TO PURSUE LOW CARBON DESIGN STRATEGIES AND VISIBLE GREEN ELEMENTS WHERE FEASIBLE, AND TO DESIGN BUILDINGS, INFRASTRUCTURE AND SYSTEMS TO MEET POST DISASTER STANDARDS TO MAINTAIN CONTINUOUS OPERATION AND CRITICAL SERVICES. Redevelopment of the VGH campus is subject to development cost levies and where applicable amenity contributions. Regarding amenity contributions, large employment hubs such as hospital campuses do come with growth costs to serve new employees. Although not fully covering the cost of growth, city policy looks to secure a nominal contribution, typically in kind. The determination of public benefits is subject to the rezoning process. However, the policy direction points to an in-kind contribution, such as child care or flexible office spaces for nonprofits or health-related community uses as potential contributions. The policy also encourages a community benefits agreement to advance local employment inclusion and procurement. Finally, the policy includes a flexible approach to phasing to meet expansion and modernization needs of the hospital over a 30-year time frame. Bases would include construction of new clinical health and support buildings and demolition of older buildings while maintaining operations. Sites cleared for future redevelopment are to be landscaped and programmed for public use in the interim. THROUGH THE WORK BEING UNDERTAKEN ON THE VGH CAMPUS, STAFF HAVE ENGAGED WITH LOCAL NATIONS THROUGH MEETINGS AND WRITTEN UPDATES. WE'VE INCLUDED POLICY DIRECTION RELATED TO CULTURAL VISIBILITY AND CREATING SAFE HEALTH CARE SPACES. FURTHER DISCUSSION IS ANTICIPATED AS PART OF THE ONGOING CAMPUS WIDE RESONING PROCESS. Staff have also sought public input online via Shape Your City and through an in-person information session. Comments received in support noted support for the modernization and expansion of the hospital, addition of more hospital rooms, retention of green space, and provision of multimodal transportation options. Comments of concern noted impacts from the size of new buildings, concern over the proposed demolition of the Heather Pavilion, impacts on privacy for neighboring residential properties, and for VGH to adhere to previous agreements with the city. Staff considered this feedback as well as feedback from advisory boards in the policy development. In conclusion, the two images here illustrate the VGH campus as it exists today on the left and a conceptual illustration of the potential cumulative change enabled through the policy on the right.

THE POLICY, SORRY, THE HOSPITAL MODERNIZES AND EXPANDS SHIFTING FROM WEST TO EAST ON THE SITE CREATING A MODERN AND COHERENT CAMPUS WITH A NETWORK OF LINEAR AND OPEN SPACES AND A LARGE INTERIM PUBLIC SPACE WHICH FURTHER UNLOCKS THE CAMPUS AND ALLOWS FOR FLEXIBILITY TOWARDS MEETING FUTURE HEALTH CARE NEEDS. THANK YOU. I WILL NOW HAND OVER TO REPRESENTATIVES FROM THE VANCOUVER COASTAL HEALTH AUTHORITY AND VANCOUVER GENERAL HOSPITAL FOR SOME REMARKS.

Dr. Vinay Dhingra Vancouver Acute / Vancouver General Hospital · Critical Care Physician and Senior Medical Director

Statement Watch

Thank you. Good morning, Mayor and Council. My name is Dr. Vinay Dhingra. I'm a critical care physician and senior medical director at Vancouver Acute, which includes Vancouver General Hospital. Thank you for your time. This is an exciting day for us at VGH, really. There are four individuals who will be speaking this morning to the VCH application before you. I'll be speaking about the clinical imperative. Fernando Pica will be speaking to you about business demands. Don Kazian will speak about phased redevelopment approach. And Addie Price will speak to you about the importance of reconciliation and culturally safe spaces. I've spent more than 30 years caring for people at VGH. My deepest commitment is to ensuring people continue to receive safe, seamless, quality care as their needs evolve. Every day, I see the extraordinary commitment of our healthcare teams, but I also see the growing pressures they are under. Annually, VGH care teams see more than 93,000 emergency visits, half a million outpatient visits, and perform more than 21,000 surgeries. These numbers have grown and will continue to grow. Our regional population is grown by 18% by as early as 2035, and those over the age of 70 who need more medical care by 47% in that same period. Every day, our teams are managing the effects of emergency department crowding, inpatient shortages, aging infrastructure, and infrastructure resulting in patients being seen and cared for in hallways, delayed admissions, longer waits, stress and strain on both families as well as healthcare providers. Supporting our vision for the future of VGH campus, this policy statement supports the kind of healthcare environment Vancouver residents need. Modern emergency care, better inpatient environments, clearer way finding, improved access, more resilient infrastructure and spaces that support patients, families and our staff. Our proposed campus redevelopment allows us to continue providing care throughout construction without losing beds or interrupting clinical services. We recognize the historical role of the Heather Pavilion and we're committed to a conservation management plan to honor that heritage. The Heather Pavilion, as you heard, has not provided patient care for more than 20 years and cannot be retrofitted or adapted to meet today's clinical standards. The other legacy that we carry with us is that of providing outstanding patient care. It's fundamental to the culture of Vancouver General Hospital. The ability for future generations of doctors, nurses, researchers, and healthcare professionals to provision that in facilities designed for modern medicine is a clinical imperative. Looking ahead, this policy gives Vancouver Coastal Health the ability to responsibly plan the next generation of healthcare infrastructure while maintaining uninterrupted care throughout its redevelopment. Mayor and Council, on behalf of the healthcare professionals, patients, and families, and generations who will depend on this hospital in the future, we respectfully ask for your support. Thank you, and I'll pass it on to my colleague, Fernando Pica. Thank you, Doctor. Good morning, Mayor, Council. My name's Fernando Pica. I'm a Chief Financial Officer for Vancouver Coastal Health and also VP of infrastructure. As you heard in the intro, you got a good summary of our VGH campus and our policy statement in front of you. What I'd like to do today is just for you, highlight a few of our, what we think are salient points for the policy statement for our campus. First, our campus is large and really complex. Many of you know it, we drive it every day. On any given day, depending on our patient census, BGH is on the top three largest campus in our country. It's BC's largest hospital site and the one of only two adult trauma centers. As you've seen our chopper fly to and from our hospital, it is the destination of some of the most complex patients in our province and one of the city's largest employers. Second, many of our buildings are quite dated. In particular, our Heller Pavilion dates back to 1903. Today it occupies almost 40% of our campus. As our doctor said, hasn't seen a patient or had any meaningful clinical activity in over 20 years. Most of our buildings on our campus do not meet census standards, sorry, seismic standards. And they struggle to deal with the new demands of extreme heat and cold and the power supply that we must draw on that campus. We are also in need of Buildings that can better withstand the effects of wildfire, of smoke, of heavier rainfall, and poor air quality. Third, our campus has limited space to grow. The campus is landlocked, making it near impossible for us to meaningfully expand. The reality is that VGH cannot grow without creating open space. The proposed policy statement that Council has will facilitate these conditions for us. Lastly, an expanded campus and all the activity that it will bring, must be safe for those that travel to and from it every day. We have been and will continue to be an avid supporter of cycling for the many thousands of employees that cycle to and from work. It is why we are requesting that Council support relocation of the West 10th Avenue bike lane to bi-directional lanes on the north side of the street. We're also requesting that the final configuration, including possible conversion of West 10th Avenue to one-way vehicle traffic, be assessed through the full campus rezoning process, with the goal of making West 10th safer for everyone. This will provide a much safer environment for cyclists, given the increased vehicle traffic we will have on that street, as ambulances, supply trucks, patient and staff vehicles on the south side of West 10th will travel. Thank you for your consideration. Pass this on to our Don Casian. Thank you. Thanks, Fernando. Good morning, Mayor and Council. My name is Don Casian, Principal of Casian Architecture and Interior Design and Planning. Today, I ask you to look beyond a single building, beyond a single block of land, and consider what the Vancouver General Hospital campus must become over the next century. I'm going to speak about three things very briefly. One is designing a world-class hospital campus, creating exceptional public spaces, and ensuring there's enough land to redevelop the campus while it continues caring for patients. One of the biggest misconceptions is that a hospital campus should be planned like a university campus, with buildings separated by generous lawns and open space. Modern hospitals simply do not work that way. Across the world, Acute care hospitals are becoming larger, taller, and more integrated because their physical form is driven by medicine and not by conventional urban development patterns. A quaternary acute care hospital functions as one interconnected system. And because healthcare today depends on highly integrated clinical services, modern hospitals require exceptionally large floor plates. We measure them at football fields. Our second phase and third phase of this project are the size of two, three, four, five football fields. Hospitals also need healing landscapes where patients, families, staff, and neighbors benefit from gardens, walking routes, sunlight, and places for reflection. The challenge is creating those spaces while keeping the clinical heart of the hospital connected. That is exactly what this policy achieves. It replaces the idea of one large, isolated open space with a connected network of healing gardens, wellness walks, public plazas, and green spaces that will evolve as the campus evolves. Over the past several years, we carefully tested many redevelopment scenarios while ensuring that the hospital could remain fully operational throughout construction. One conclusion became unavoidable, that the Heather Pavilion site is the key that unlocks the orderly phased redevelopment of the campus. It provides the opportunity to construct the future replacement for the Blackmoor Pavilion while the existing hospital continues operating. In turn, that preserves the space required to eventually replace the Jim Pattison Pavilions and allows each subsequent phase of redevelopment to proceed without interrupting patient care. As was mentioned, the Heather Pavilion cannot meet the demands of modern health care. Its layout and billing systems are functionally obsolete. The structure and form are impossible to retrofit for modern health care delivery. And it remains vulnerable to seismic risk, resulting in a retrofit that would be prohibitively expensive while still delivering a compromise below standard facility. This does make it one of the most difficult decisions, but ultimately necessary decision, a planning decision before you. The building is an important part of Vancouver General Hospital's history, and it deserves to be commemorated. The policy commits to exactly that through a comprehensive conservation management plan and meaningful commemoration. Mayor and Council, hospitals exist for one purpose, to care for people. Every generation before us has adapted this campus to meet the healthcare needs of its time. And today it's our responsibility to ensure Vancouver General Hospital can continue adapting to meet healthcare needs for the next 100 years. This policy does provide that planning framework to make that possible. Thank you. And I'll hand over to my colleague, Addie Price. Good morning, Mayor and Council. First of all, I'd be remiss if I didn't thank you for your commitment to reconciliation, as was evidenced by your land acknowledgement this morning and the beautiful artwork you have throughout your building. My name is Addie Price. I'm the Vice President for Indigenous Health at Vancouver Coastal Health. The Vancouver General Hospital, as you know, is located on the traditional ancestral and unceded territories of the Musqueam, Squamish, and TTsleil-Waututh nations. As we plan the future of this campus, our responsibility extends beyond clinical capacity. We must also create a space where Indigenous patients, families, and communities feel respected, welcomed, and culturally safe. For too many Indigenous people, healthcare institutions have historically been associated with exclusion, discrimination, and trauma. At Vancouver Coastal Health, our responsibility is to acknowledge that history while creating spaces that better support healing for future generations. The physical environment matters. Buildings, public spaces, and the overall character of a campus all contribute to whether people feel safe seeking care. This redevelopment gives us an opportunity to create a healthcare environment that better reflects Indigenous values, supports healing, and strengthens relationships with the communities we serve. In that context, the Heather Pavilion deserves thoughtful consideration. While the building has historical significance, its institutional architectural expression also reinforces memories and experiences that some indigenous people associate with historical trauma at residential schools, my family included. Our responsibility is to acknowledge that history while creating spaces that better support healing for future generations. This policy provides the opportunity to respectfully commemorate the past, while creating a campus that reflects today's values of inclusion, reconciliation, and culturally safe care.

Shelley Fleck Vancouver General Hospital

Statement Watch

I'm Shelley Fleck. I'm also representing Vancouver General Hospital in this file. I would like to add that we have consulted with EHS, VPD, our internal stakeholders, our emergency department. you know, users of the facility as well when it comes to the 10th Avenue bike lane and really have received some feedback what would work and what would not work. As a piece of this work, we also consulted with Lunt, who is a local transportation company here in Vancouver. We worked with them on what the possibilities might be to revise the 10th Avenue bike lane and then also the one-way or two-way traffic along there as well. So we are looking for some direction today from Council. to continue this conversation formally as we work over the next six months for the final rezoning obligation document that's gonna come before you in early 2027. We understand that it is a conversation and it is something we have to work through with Paul and Kent and our city colleagues, but it is something that we really do want the opportunity to have some earnest conversation around. We will also consult with cycling community as well. As Fernando indicated, we have an active cycling community at Vancouver Coastal. We are going to continue to support cycling. We will engage with our community.

I'm sorry to interrupt, but just to be clear, you want direction today?

Yes, we do.

On the bike lane. Thank you.

Paul Storer City of Vancouver · Director of Transportation

Statement Watch

Why don't I take that? Paul Storer, Director of Transportation. Yeah, thanks for the question. We haven't worked through construction phasing yet. There are different options with construction to look at how you, you know, build up so you construct the site, but we know it is going to be a difficult one to build off of the 10th Avenue bikeway. You know, 10th Avenue is a super complex corridor. It took us many, many years of conversation with the hospital and persons with disabilities and the other institutions along the corridor to land on the current design. So we're going to need to look at it really closely, both in terms of what we do in terms of facilities over the longer term, but also in terms of that construction phasing and impacts.

Okay. And do you know offhand how much that cost? Because that was a fairly recent project, the bike lane.

Yeah, so the current lanes were, I think, about 10 million total, a little bit more. If we looked at doing that work now, you know, construction costs have gone way up. It might be double that or something like that. Okay, thank you.

Transcript

194 segments

We're all set eyes are visible great

Clerk 12:08:12

Good morning, Mayor and Council. My name is Ken McDougall from the City's Special Project Office. I'm here to present the Vancouver General Hospital Broadway Plan updates.

Shown here is an aerial photo highlighting generally the VGH area in red. The site is a large and unique site located in the Fairview neighborhood, and it's generally bounded by the lane between Broadway and 10th Avenue to the north, 13th Avenue to the south, Oak Street to the west, and Ass Street to the east.

The VGH area is designated institutional in the Vancouver Official Development Plan, which are lands reserved for essential community-serving institutional uses such as major hospitals. VGH is located within the MetroCorp Broadway area, which is the principal center of business, employment, cultural, and entertainment activity in the city and region.

Under the Broadway plan, the VGH institutional area includes broad policy direction to support the expansion of VGH to meet long-term institutional and health care needs. Current policy generally supports building heights up to 350 feet or up to the underside of the Queen Elizabeth Park view cone, and we're not restricted by helicopter flight paths. It seeks improved walking, rolling, and cycling connections, significant public open space, and active ground floor uses are strongly encouraged.

Within the VGH institutional area, Vancouver General Hospital, through Vancouver Coastal Health Authority, or VCH, is the primary landowner. These lands constitute the VGH campus area and are the focus of the policy updates brought forward today. This is an aerial view of the campus as it currently exists. VGH has evolved into a nationally significant referral, teaching, and research hospital whose layered campus reflects more than a century of incremental growth. It remains the largest hospital in BC, providing acute and trauma care, serving as the provincial referral center for many adult programs and specialist services, while also acting as Vancouver's community hospital. Looking ahead, VGH finds itself at a critical juncture in the provision of provincial health care services. With a largely built out and landlocked site, new development requires the demolition of existing buildings to make space for new facilities. THESE NEW FACILITIES MUST BE OPERATIONAL BEFORE OLDER BUILDINGS CAN BE VACATED TO ENSURE CONTINUITY OF PATIENT CARE.

VGH CAMPUS BUILDINGS AND INFRASTRUCTURE ARE AGING WITH 80% OF IMPATIENT BEDS LOCATED IN FACILITIES BUILT BETWEEN 1953 AND 1989. THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT BUILT IN THE MID-1970S IS TOO SMALL FOR CURRENT NEEDS. IMPATIENT AND EMERGENCY BED SHORTAGES CREATE DAILY OPERATIONAL CHALLENGES. WITH A GROWING AND AGING POPULATION IN VANCOUVER, THE REGION AND THE PROVINCE, DEMAND FOR HEALTH CARE SERVICES IS PROJECTED TO INCREASE BY 25% BY 2035, WITH EMERGENCY VOLUMES RISING WHILE AGING BUILDINGS AND LIMITED LAND RESTRICT EXPANSION AND MODERNIZATION.

ACKNOWLEDGING THE CRITICAL ROLE THAT VGH PLAYS IN DELIVERING HEALTH CARE TO ALL BRITISH COLUMBIANS, THERE IS AN OVERWHELMING NEED TO EXPAND AND MODERNIZE HEALTH CARE FACILITIES AT THE CAMPUS AND REDEVELOPMENT IS A KEY PROVINCIAL, REGIONAL AND MUNICIPAL PRIORITY.

Clerk 12:11:24

IN RESPONSE, ACHIEVING HEALTHCARE OBJECTIVES HAS BEEN A PRIMARY DRIVER OF THE CITY PLANNING PROCESSES AND STAFF ARE WORKING TOWARDS DEVELOPING A MORE FLEXIBLE FRAMEWORK OF POLICY AND ZONING THAT PRIORITIZES HEALTHCARE DELIVERY AT THE CAMPUS.

An example of the flexible approach being taken, staff received a rezoning application for the VGH campus in fall of 2025. This application, as well as ongoing collaboration and discussion with VGH, led to three concurrent work streams being undertaken to assess and support VGH in the goal of modernization and expansion of the hospital. First is the development of site-specific policies to guide the long-term redevelopment of the VGH campus. These policies, in the form of Broadway plan updates, are the subject of this report. Second is a requested text amendment to the site's existing zoning to pursue a new emergency and inpatient care building along West 10th Avenue. This application was approved on consent earlier this morning. Finally, staff are assessing a VGH campus-wide rezoning application proposing long-term phased redevelopment to modernize and expand the hospital. This work is ongoing and would come forward in 2027.

The VGH campus policy statement, which in the form of a Broadway plan appendix, is a long-term vision for the campus to enable renewal, growth, and modernization of healthcare facilities. It aims to provide a clear and robust framework of planning principles and design parameters while maintaining flexibility for VGH. Direction includes departures from past policies, approvals, and obligations in recognition of current challenges and future needs. I will now provide an overview of the proposed policy direction, highlighting key elements.

STARTING WITH RECONCILIATION, WITH THE AIM TO FOSTER CULTURALLY SAFE AND WELCOMING ENVIRONMENTS THAT VISIBLY AND RESPECTFULLY REFLECTS LOCAL NATIONS' VALUES, HISTORIES, KNOWLEDGE, LANGUAGES AND ART, ENSURING THEIR PRESENCE AND PERSPECTIVES ARE EMBEDDED THROUGHOUT THE CAMPUS. KEY POLICY DIRECTION SEEKS OPPORTUNITIES TO COLLABORATE WITH LOCAL NATIONS ON CULTURAL VISIBILITY IN THE PUBLIC REALM AND OPEN SPACES. AS WELL, LOOKING FOR BUILDING DESIGN TO CONTRIBUTE TOWARDS CREATING CULTURALLY SAFE HEALTH CARE ENVIRONMENTS.

In terms of land use and density, the policy promotes a mix of land uses and development density that supports and expands on the site's core healthcare functions with appropriate flexibility for the site to adapt to evolving service needs. Key policy direction includes flexible mix of healthcare-related land uses appropriate for a campus environment and for density to be determined through zoning based on healthcare requirements and the ability to achieve high-quality built form, site design, and open space outcomes.

Policy includes direction on built form and site design to enable a coherent and high-performing health care environment that balances the complex functional requirements of a hospital campus with good urban design to improve the experience of patients, staff, visitors, and the broader community. Key policy direction includes accommodating large, efficient building forms for health care functionality while respecting protected public views and helicopter flight paths.

Clerk 12:14:33

Policies promote a high-quality design leading to a more legible, coherent, and accessible campus with a strengthened public realm and improved integration with surroundings.

One of the key areas of departure from past policies and approvals is for the approach to open space. Under existing approvals from the 2000s, the VGH campus is obligated to provide approximately nine acres of public open space, illustrated in the top right of this slide. Some portions of this concept have been implemented, including portions of an open space corridor along Willow Street, a plaza south of 12th Avenue. These examples are highlighted in the photos along the bottom. Space constraints on the campus and increased healthcare demands dictate a different approach with reduced open space requirements.

THE KEY POLICY DIRECTIONS INCLUDE LOOKING TO ESTABLISH A CONNECTED OPEN SPACE NETWORK WITH A SYSTEM OF LINEAR CORRIDORS AND NODES BRINGING STRUCTURE TO THE CAMPUS. RATHER THAN THE EXISTING NINE ACRES OF PERMANENT OPEN SPACE EXPECTATION, THE NEW POLICY WOULD TARGET FOUR ACRES OF PERMANENT OPEN SPACE THROUGH LINEAR AND NOTAL SPACES. AS WELL THE POLICY SETS A TARGET FOR 30% OF THE CAMPUS AS PUBLIC OPEN SPACE THROUGH A MIX OF PERMANENT AND INTERIM SPACES THAT EVOLVE THROUGH PHASE DEVELOPMENT. The interim spaces would consist of large sites cleared for redevelopment, which are to be put into public use on an interim basis.

The policy also looks to establish a continuous wellness walk circuit along streets and corridors linking buildings and open spaces.

Another area of departure from existing obligations is regarding the approach to heritage. Through past approvals, portions of the Heather Pavilion, a building on site, are municipally designated and protected through a heritage revitalization agreement. However, the building has not been used for patient care in over 20 years and is functionally obsolete for modern health care uses. Retrofitting it to meet contemporary standards would be complex, prohibitively expensive, and suboptimal compared to new purpose-built facilities. Recognizing these challenges, plus growing healthcare demands and campus space constraints, the Heather Pavilion is proposed for demolition.

In response, the proposed key policy directions look to establish a Heritage Conservation Management Plan to inform the future phased redevelopment of the VGH campus. This would enable consideration of interpretation as the primary conservation approach as an alternative to preservation and rehabilitation of the Heather Pavilion. The approach would include a review of existing heritage agreements, identifying modifications and council approvals needed for contemplated demolition. Proposed policy looks to advance substantive and meaningful strategies to commemorate the heritage value of the campus, including reuse of salvaged materials and heritage elements into new buildings and landscape. The VGH campus was presented to the City's Heritage Commission in March of this year, receiving support and principle for the redevelopment of the campus, subject to further work on conservation approaches for the Heather Pavilion.

Clerk 12:17:44

The VGH campus policy statement contains guidance on transportation, looking to strengthen connections to and through the campus, supporting diverse mobility needs unique to a health care environment. KEY POLICY DIRECTION AIMS TO IMPROVE SAFETY AND COMFORT FOR ALL ROAD USERS, REDUCE CONFLICTS AND SIMPLIFY VEHICLE MOVEMENTS AND SUPPORT EFFICIENT HOSPITAL OPERATIONS, ENHANCE WALKING, CYCLING AND ROLLING THROUGH ACTIVE TRAVEL LANES SUCH AS THE TENTH AVENUE GREENWAY, SUPPORT FOR WIDER SIDEWALKS AND HIGH QUALITY PUBLIC REALM. THE POLICY ALSO SUPPORTS CLEAR WAYFINDING STRATEGIES AND STRENGTHENING INTERNAL CAMPUS CONNECTIONS.

THE POLICY INCLUDES GUIDANCE RELATED TO SUSTAINABILITY AND RESILIENCE, TO PURSUE LOW CARBON DESIGN STRATEGIES AND VISIBLE GREEN ELEMENTS WHERE FEASIBLE, AND TO DESIGN BUILDINGS, INFRASTRUCTURE AND SYSTEMS TO MEET POST DISASTER STANDARDS TO MAINTAIN CONTINUOUS OPERATION AND CRITICAL SERVICES.

Redevelopment of the VGH campus is subject to development cost levies and where applicable amenity contributions. Regarding amenity contributions, large employment hubs such as hospital campuses do come with growth costs to serve new employees. Although not fully covering the cost of growth, city policy looks to secure a nominal contribution, typically in kind. The determination of public benefits is subject to the rezoning process. However, the policy direction points to an in-kind contribution, such as child care or flexible office spaces for nonprofits or health-related community uses as potential contributions. The policy also encourages a community benefits agreement to advance local employment inclusion and procurement.

Finally, the policy includes a flexible approach to phasing to meet expansion and modernization needs of the hospital over a 30-year time frame. Bases would include construction of new clinical health and support buildings and demolition of older buildings while maintaining operations. Sites cleared for future redevelopment are to be landscaped and programmed for public use in the interim.

THROUGH THE WORK BEING UNDERTAKEN ON THE VGH CAMPUS, STAFF HAVE ENGAGED WITH LOCAL NATIONS THROUGH MEETINGS AND WRITTEN UPDATES. WE'VE INCLUDED POLICY DIRECTION RELATED TO CULTURAL VISIBILITY AND CREATING SAFE HEALTH CARE SPACES. FURTHER DISCUSSION IS ANTICIPATED AS PART OF THE ONGOING CAMPUS WIDE RESONING PROCESS. Staff have also sought public input online via Shape Your City and through an in-person information session. Comments received in support noted support for the modernization and expansion of the hospital, addition of more hospital rooms, retention of green space, and provision of multimodal transportation options. Comments of concern noted impacts from the size of new buildings, concern over the proposed demolition of the Heather Pavilion, impacts on privacy for neighboring residential properties, and for VGH to adhere to previous agreements with the city. Staff considered this feedback as well as feedback from advisory boards in the policy development.

In conclusion, the two images here illustrate the VGH campus as it exists today on the left and a conceptual illustration of the potential cumulative change enabled through the policy on the right.

Clerk 12:20:47

THE POLICY, SORRY, THE HOSPITAL MODERNIZES AND EXPANDS SHIFTING FROM WEST TO EAST ON THE SITE CREATING A MODERN AND COHERENT CAMPUS WITH A NETWORK OF LINEAR AND OPEN SPACES AND A LARGE INTERIM PUBLIC SPACE WHICH FURTHER UNLOCKS THE CAMPUS AND ALLOWS FOR FLEXIBILITY TOWARDS MEETING FUTURE HEALTH CARE NEEDS.

THANK YOU. I WILL NOW HAND OVER TO REPRESENTATIVES FROM THE VANCOUVER COASTAL HEALTH AUTHORITY AND VANCOUVER GENERAL HOSPITAL FOR SOME REMARKS.

Thank you. Good morning, Mayor and Council. My name is Dr. Vinay Dhingra. I'm a critical care physician and senior medical director at Vancouver Acute, which includes Vancouver General Hospital. Thank you for your time. This is an exciting day for us at VGH, really. There are four individuals who will be speaking this morning to the VCH application before you. I'll be speaking about the clinical imperative. Fernando Pica will be speaking to you about business demands. Don Kazian will speak about phased redevelopment approach. And Addie Price will speak to you about the importance of reconciliation and culturally safe spaces. I've spent more than 30 years caring for people at VGH. My deepest commitment is to ensuring people continue to receive safe, seamless, quality care as their needs evolve. Every day, I see the extraordinary commitment of our healthcare teams, but I also see the growing pressures they are under. Annually, VGH care teams see more than 93,000 emergency visits, half a million outpatient visits, and perform more than 21,000 surgeries. These numbers have grown and will continue to grow. Our regional population is grown by 18% by as early as 2035, and those over the age of 70 who need more medical care by 47% in that same period. Every day, our teams are managing the effects of emergency department crowding, inpatient shortages, aging infrastructure, and infrastructure resulting in patients being seen and cared for in hallways, delayed admissions, longer waits, stress and strain on both families as well as healthcare providers.

Supporting our vision for the future of VGH campus, this policy statement supports the kind of healthcare environment Vancouver residents need. Modern emergency care, better inpatient environments, clearer way finding, improved access, more resilient infrastructure and spaces that support patients, families and our staff. Our proposed campus redevelopment allows us to continue providing care throughout construction without losing beds or interrupting clinical services. We recognize the historical role of the Heather Pavilion and we're committed to a conservation management plan to honor that heritage. The Heather Pavilion, as you heard, has not provided patient care for more than 20 years and cannot be retrofitted or adapted to meet today's clinical standards. The other legacy that we carry with us is that of providing outstanding patient care. It's fundamental to the culture of Vancouver General Hospital. The ability for future generations of doctors, nurses, researchers, and healthcare professionals to provision that in facilities designed for modern medicine is a clinical imperative. Looking ahead, this policy gives Vancouver Coastal Health the ability to responsibly plan the next generation of healthcare infrastructure while maintaining uninterrupted care throughout its redevelopment. Mayor and Council, on behalf of the healthcare professionals, patients, and families, and generations who will depend on this hospital in the future, we respectfully ask for your support. Thank you, and I'll pass it on to my colleague, Fernando Pica.

Thank you, Doctor. Good morning, Mayor, Council. My name's Fernando Pica. I'm a Chief Financial Officer for Vancouver Coastal Health and also VP of infrastructure. As you heard in the intro, you got a good summary of our VGH campus and our policy statement in front of you. What I'd like to do today is just for you, highlight a few of our, what we think are salient points for the policy statement for our campus.

First, our campus is large and really complex. Many of you know it, we drive it every day. On any given day, depending on our patient census, BGH is on the top three largest campus in our country. It's BC's largest hospital site and the one of only two adult trauma centers. As you've seen our chopper fly to and from our hospital, it is the destination of some of the most complex patients in our province and one of the city's largest employers. Second, many of our buildings are quite dated. In particular, our Heller Pavilion dates back to 1903. Today it occupies almost 40% of our campus. As our doctor said, hasn't seen a patient or had any meaningful clinical activity in over 20 years.

Most of our buildings on our campus do not meet census standards, sorry, seismic standards. And they struggle to deal with the new demands of extreme heat and cold and the power supply that we must draw on that campus. We are also in need of Buildings that can better withstand the effects of wildfire, of smoke, of heavier rainfall, and poor air quality. Third, our campus has limited space to grow. The campus is landlocked, making it near impossible for us to meaningfully expand. The reality is that VGH cannot grow without creating open space. The proposed policy statement that Council has will facilitate these conditions for us. Lastly, an expanded campus and all the activity that it will bring, must be safe for those that travel to and from it every day. We have been and will continue to be an avid supporter of cycling for the many thousands of employees that cycle to and from work. It is why we are requesting that Council support relocation of the West 10th Avenue bike lane to bi-directional lanes on the north side of the street. We're also requesting that the final configuration, including possible conversion of West 10th Avenue to one-way vehicle traffic, be assessed through the full campus rezoning process, with the goal of making West 10th safer for everyone. This will provide a much safer environment for cyclists, given the increased vehicle traffic we will have on that street, as ambulances, supply trucks, patient and staff vehicles on the south side of West 10th will travel. Thank you for your consideration. Pass this on to our Don Casian. Thank you.

Thanks, Fernando. Good morning, Mayor and Council. My name is Don Casian, Principal of Casian Architecture and Interior Design and Planning. Today, I ask you to look beyond a single building, beyond a single block of land, and consider what the Vancouver General Hospital campus must become over the next century. I'm going to speak about three things very briefly. One is designing a world-class hospital campus, creating exceptional public spaces, and ensuring there's enough land to redevelop the campus while it continues caring for patients. One of the biggest misconceptions is that a hospital campus should be planned like a university campus, with buildings separated by generous lawns and open space. Modern hospitals simply do not work that way. Across the world, Acute care hospitals are becoming larger, taller, and more integrated because their physical form is driven by medicine and not by conventional urban development patterns.

A quaternary acute care hospital functions as one interconnected system. And because healthcare today depends on highly integrated clinical services, modern hospitals require exceptionally large floor plates. We measure them at football fields. Our second phase and third phase of this project are the size of two, three, four, five football fields. Hospitals also need healing landscapes where patients, families, staff, and neighbors benefit from gardens, walking routes, sunlight, and places for reflection. The challenge is creating those spaces while keeping the clinical heart of the hospital connected. That is exactly what this policy achieves. It replaces the idea of one large, isolated open space with a connected network of healing gardens, wellness walks, public plazas, and green spaces that will evolve as the campus evolves.

Over the past several years, we carefully tested many redevelopment scenarios while ensuring that the hospital could remain fully operational throughout construction. One conclusion became unavoidable, that the Heather Pavilion site is the key that unlocks the orderly phased redevelopment of the campus. It provides the opportunity to construct the future replacement for the Blackmoor Pavilion while the existing hospital continues operating. In turn, that preserves the space required to eventually replace the Jim Pattison Pavilions and allows each subsequent phase of redevelopment to proceed without interrupting patient care. As was mentioned, the Heather Pavilion cannot meet the demands of modern health care. Its layout and billing systems are functionally obsolete. The structure and form are impossible to retrofit for modern health care delivery. And it remains vulnerable to seismic risk, resulting in a retrofit that would be prohibitively expensive while still delivering a compromise below standard facility. This does make it one of the most difficult decisions, but ultimately necessary decision, a planning decision before you. The building is an important part of Vancouver General Hospital's history, and it deserves to be commemorated. The policy commits to exactly that through a comprehensive conservation management plan and meaningful commemoration.

Mayor and Council, hospitals exist for one purpose, to care for people. Every generation before us has adapted this campus to meet the healthcare needs of its time. And today it's our responsibility to ensure Vancouver General Hospital can continue adapting to meet healthcare needs for the next 100 years. This policy does provide that planning framework to make that possible. Thank you. And I'll hand over to my colleague, Addie Price.

Good morning, Mayor and Council. First of all, I'd be remiss if I didn't thank you for your commitment to reconciliation, as was evidenced by your land acknowledgement this morning and the beautiful artwork you have throughout your building. My name is Addie Price. I'm the Vice President for Indigenous Health at Vancouver Coastal Health. The Vancouver General Hospital, as you know, is located on the traditional ancestral and unceded territories of the Musqueam, Squamish, and TTsleil-Waututh nations. As we plan the future of this campus, our responsibility extends beyond clinical capacity. We must also create a space where Indigenous patients, families, and communities feel respected, welcomed, and culturally safe. For too many Indigenous people, healthcare institutions have historically been associated with exclusion, discrimination, and trauma. At Vancouver Coastal Health, our responsibility is to acknowledge that history while creating spaces that better support healing for future generations. The physical environment matters. Buildings, public spaces, and the overall character of a campus all contribute to whether people feel safe seeking care. This redevelopment gives us an opportunity to create a healthcare environment that better reflects Indigenous values, supports healing, and strengthens relationships with the communities we serve. In that context, the Heather Pavilion deserves thoughtful consideration. While the building has historical significance, its institutional architectural expression also reinforces memories and experiences that some indigenous people associate with historical trauma at residential schools, my family included. Our responsibility is to acknowledge that history while creating spaces that better support healing for future generations. This policy provides the opportunity to respectfully commemorate the past, while creating a campus that reflects today's values of inclusion, reconciliation, and culturally safe care.

Thank you.

Thanks, Mayor. And thank you for the presentations and updates. I principally have two questions. One is around the Heather Pavilion and appreciating the comments that hasn't been used for medical care for many years and the challenges of retrofit to bring it up. I'm just curious if there was any exploration of and recognizing the prohibitive nature of this in terms of financing is the retrofitting, but also building around it as we've seen with some other heritage structures in the city. We've got some number of examples downtown where we've been able to maintain a site, a building, and then build above and around. I'm just curious if that was contemplated or if you could just comment on that given the nature and the interest in the Heather Pavilion.

probably every possible option on the planet, including that one. And we tried different ways to move around it, with it, incorporate it. The first big issue was we need a couple thousand stall parkade underground. because we're very short of parking. And then when you realize the... So we can't go under it. When you realize the floor plates of modern health care are just jammed with technology that needs to change with big high ceiling heights to get service, all of this equipment, and then the changes that happen on an annual basis to move these facilities around inside... It's really, it just didn't work, basically.

Okay. The report mentioned in the presentation around commemorative efforts, and so what does that look like in a more tangible way if there's no way to preserve the building in any fashion or parts of the building?

There's quite a range of possibilities. St. Paul's Hospital, for example, has taken parts of some of their old buildings. Probably not to the extent that we will, but we can use portions of the building. because the granite is granite. It is stable. It just needs to be taken apart and reconstructed, as well as in the landscape. There's lots of ways to incorporate the building in the landscape, the towers, the granite. There's a great piece of signage across the entry of the Heather Pavilion that would be great to preserve as well. We're thinking inside the building or outside the new buildings that happen. But those are all, the next couple of months we'll be studying those possibilities. And actually we're pretty excited about it.

Okay, thank you. I know others may have questions on that, but I just want to move to another question.

VGH referenced the interest around the 10th Avenue bikeway, particularly having a bi-directional route on the north side of the street and also one-way traffic. I'm just curious, what kind of conversations have happened, and staff can obviously comment as well, is like what kind of conversations have happened around that? It is a very busy area, having walked it and ridden it and I'm thinking with all the paramedic vehicles and so on and so could you comment on is that something that you need direction on today or is that something that will be contemplated as this evolves in the first phases?

WE HAVE HAD A NUMBER OF DISCUSSIONS AND WE WOULD ANTICIPATE HAVING ONGOING DISCUSSIONS WITH THE APPLICANT TEAM. I THINK HAVING TENTH AVENUE FUNCTION SAFELY AND FUNCTIONALLY IS THE CORE GOAL BOTH FOR VGH AND THE CITY. BEYOND THAT, WHETHER WE REQUIRE EXPLICIT DIRECTION IN SUPPORT OF ANY ONGOING DISCUSSION, WE INTEND TO DO SO AND WE'VE SIGNALLED THAT IN OUR REPORT TO DATE. Okay, so it sounds like this is an active conversation recognizing holistically we want this to be a safe place for whether it be visitors, patients, cyclists, pedestrians, and so you'll be continuing that. It doesn't sound like you need directions specifically, but this is going to be an ongoing conversation. That's our intention from a staff team. And there would be a report back to council as this progresses? Because I know it's a very long-term project. Yes, it would come forward with the rezoning, the campus-wide rezoning, which is an active application, which would be the next piece that would come forward in 2027. Okay. I'll leave it there because others have questions. Thank you.

Thank you, Councillor Meiszner.

Yeah, thanks. And thanks for being here. I actually had two similar questions, so maybe I'll just follow up for a bit more clarity on both of those. And I'll start with the 10th Avenue bike lane as well. Was there ever consideration of moving the location of the emergency room exit or entrance for the new emergency room to West 12th, for example, or a different street to reduce conflicts with that bike lane?

In the future future, once the Jim Patterson building comes down and gets reconstructed, emergency will come off at 12th. Okay. So, but that's... That'll be 20, 30 years from now. In the meantime, we're going to be adding a couple thousand cars onto 10th and Heather and 12th. And so there's lots of activity. Along 10th, we have many curb cuts to access arcades, as well as loading and supply chain stuff. So there's going to be a lot of activity. And during construction, we'll likely have to even move those bike lanes to the north side of the street anyways, because there's going to be lots of construction trucks for many, many years along 10th Avenue.

Okay. Thank you for that. Just to follow up on that, can I ask staff if that will be viable or possible to move that existing, I guess, unidirectional bike lane on each side of the street to the north side? of 10th during the construction. Is that the plan that we're contemplating or anticipating?

Clerk 12:39:44

Why don't I take that? Paul Storer, Director of Transportation. Yeah, thanks for the question. We haven't worked through construction phasing yet. There are different options with construction to look at how you, you know, build up so you construct the site, but we know it is going to be a difficult one to build off of the 10th Avenue bikeway. You know, 10th Avenue is a super complex corridor. It took us many, many years of conversation with the hospital and persons with disabilities and the other institutions along the corridor to land on the current design. So we're going to need to look at it really closely, both in terms of what we do in terms of facilities over the longer term, but also in terms of that construction phasing and impacts.

Okay. And do you know offhand how much that cost? Because that was a fairly recent project, the bike lane.

Clerk 12:40:32

Yeah, so the current lanes were, I think, about 10 million total, a little bit more. If we looked at doing that work now, you know, construction costs have gone way up. It might be double that or something like that. Okay, thank you.

Appreciate that, Paul. For the applicant, I understand, obviously, from your perspective, there is conflict existing there currently, and that will increase with this new development. Are you proposing to make any sort of contribution financially in order to help relocate that bike lane that was recently constructed to the north side of 10th, for example? Is that part of your plan or proposal?

Yes, it is.

To make a financial contribution towards that?

Correct.

Okay. And are you able to share what you're proposing?

In terms of financial contribution? Yes. Well, the cost isn't figured out yet. This will all be in the spirit of major construction going on and major budgets to do that. And safety is critical here.

Okay, that's good to know that you're open to that.

I'm Shelley Fleck. I'm also representing Vancouver General Hospital in this file. I would like to add that we have consulted with EHS, VPD, our internal stakeholders, our emergency department. you know, users of the facility as well when it comes to the 10th Avenue bike lane and really have received some feedback what would work and what would not work. As a piece of this work, we also consulted with Lunt, who is a local transportation company here in Vancouver. We worked with them on what the possibilities might be to revise the 10th Avenue bike lane and then also the one-way or two-way traffic along there as well. So we are looking for some direction today from Council. to continue this conversation formally as we work over the next six months for the final rezoning obligation document that's gonna come before you in early 2027. We understand that it is a conversation and it is something we have to work through with Paul and Kent and our city colleagues, but it is something that we really do want the opportunity to have some earnest conversation around. We will also consult with cycling community as well. As Fernando indicated, we have an active cycling community at Vancouver Coastal. We are going to continue to support cycling. We will engage with our community.

I'm sorry to interrupt, but just to be clear, you want direction today?

Yes, we do.

On the bike lane. Thank you.

Thank you. Councillor Zhou.

Yeah, thanks, Mayor. Thanks to our city staff and also Vancouver Coastal Health for all the work for this project. I think it's arguably, not arguably, I think it's the most important healthcare expansion project in the province in the next 10 years. So my question is about the capacity for the new hospital. So I've been involved in many... hospital redesign, a redevelopment project, BC Children's Hospital, my previous career at Fraser Health for the Cedar Memorial and also Opsford Regional Hospital. I think one of the challenges, when we build a hospital, we realize we should build bigger. There's not enough capacity. So my question first to our staff is, does this policy provide Vancouver Coast Health with enough flexibility in responding to the changing healthcare needs, technology, and population growth?

Clerk 12:44:05

Thank you for the question, Ken McDougall, Special Projects Office. I would say that we believe that it does. The intention of the policy statement is to provide some guidance and guardrails specifically around elements of public realm, safety on 10th Avenue and other streets, around direction for heritage, how to continue that conversation, open space. But outside of those pieces, I think we're intending to have large tracts of land available for the hospital that can be flexible and meet their needs.

Okay, so for instance, if in 10 years, we say you want to further expand the hospital, building a higher building or bigger building, does that policy provide that flexibility?

Clerk 12:44:44

The policy provides that flexibility, yes. And we intend to carry that forward into rezoning as well.

Okay, so I'll ask the same question to my Coastal Health team. Do you think this policy provides you that flexibility in terms of meeting the demand, the growing demand in the future?

Yes, it will.

Thank you. Good. The other question is about the child care space. So that's another challenge facing by the hospital operations. A lot of frontline nurses, doctors, they cannot find the child care space. I know it's briefly mentioned in this document, but it didn't mention how many more child care space it will create. Do you have any idea about child care?

Clerk 12:45:23

IN TERMS OF THE PUBLIC BENEFITS AND COMMUNITY CONTRIBUTIONS WHICH WOULD BE DRIVING THE CHILDCARE CONTRIBUTIONS FROM THE CITY PERSPECTIVE, WE DON'T HAVE A FINAL NUMBER. THE POLICY PROVIDES DIRECTION OF WHAT TO LOOK FOR. WE THINK CHILDCARE WOULD BE A GOOD PRIORITY, A GOOD THING TO LAND ON A HEALTHCARE CAMPUS SUCH AS THIS. BUT OFFICE SPACES ARE ALSO COULD BE CONSIDERED. PERHAPS VGH, I DON'T KNOW IF THERE'S ANYTHING TO ADD TO THAT.

No, to answer your question, no, we don't have a number. That is something that we would take under advisement as we're planning each building and starting to develop the campus. Child care, as you indicated, is very important to us as well. We have staff that work 24-7 and we are looking for a new model of child care that can provide that. spaces 24-7 as well, but that will be worked out as each building is developed.

Okay, including 24-7's childcare space as well.

That is something that we would want to pursue to see if it's something we could see happen.

Okay, great. Thank you. So the other question is about, I know the Oak Ridge, Oak VGH Station, Skytrain Station will be opening very soon. So I know this will improve the walking, cycling, transit access, also the emergency vehicle moment. But there are patients and visitors, they rely on driving to the campus. It's very important for people with mobility issues. How can we make sure that people rely on cars have reliable access to the campus?

That's all part of the planning that we've done with the buildings and the landscapes and the site work. It's a critical part of design, and so it will be incorporated.

Clerk 12:47:05

Yeah. Okay. Any things on planning? Yeah. Special projects office. We've heard through our processes that definitely driving, particularly those in moments of crisis or needing health care services, that's one of the primary ways that they would access the hospital. So it is one of the focuses. OF THE CAMPUS ULTIMATELY SUPPORTING ALL MODES OF TRANSIT BUT ACKNOWLEDGING THAT VEHICLE TRAFFIC WOULD BE A COMPONENT TO THIS. I THINK IN THE NEW BUILDING THEY'RE INTENDING AND PLANNING FOR UNDERGROUND PARKING TO COME ONLINE AS WELL AS THE PARK AID ON 12th AVENUE WHICH REMAINS IN PLACE FOR SOME TIME WHICH CURRENTLY PROVIDES OVER 2000 PARKING SPACES. SO IT'S ONE OF THE CHALLENGES ON THE SITE THAT WE'RE COGNIZANT OF AND CONTINUE TO WORK ON.

Okay, so my last very quick procedure questions. So this plan does not make sure that, I mean, for the future redevelopment project, we still need to approve on a case-by-case basis, right? Approve this plan does not guarantee we approve every single project in the future. Is that right?

Clerk 12:48:05

Correct. This is the policy framework that informs where we intend to go from a rezoning perspective, but ultimately in 2027, the work on a campus-wide rezoning, which would come back with the specific land use, the density, and other provisions would be included at that time. Thanks.

Councillor Bligh.

Thanks very much. Just a follow-up question to staff in terms of the reference to a wellness walk. Could you just share a little bit more about what that meant as one of the policy statements?

Clerk 12:48:39

Sure. It is a conceptual idea that's put in place. When we think of the hospital as a campus, to use an example, if people are familiar along 12th near Oak, there is an enhanced setback with an extra row of trees that currently exist there. If features like that were to be extended around the campus and connect and link through plazas and other things, that those features would accumulate into a wellness walk. as a key feature around the hospital, but we haven't pinned down specific details of exactly where just promoting the aspiration to work towards that.

Yeah. Okay. No, I really appreciate that. And given it's a hospital, of course, wellness walk is makes sense in that context. Um, And maybe to the applicant then, how does it extend to connecting, allowing connection between communities given the proximity to the rapid transit line on Broadway there and the hospital's sort of footprint is so, in the grand scheme of the plan, whether it's in the next few years or in 20 years, I have a keen interest in pedestrianizing this redevelopment vision to make sure that people see it as that public amenity that allows them to access a high rapid transit corridor like we are building on Broadway. So your sort of high-level vision of how you see that coming to fruition would be really helpful.

Wellness Walk and other pedestrian walkways and areas are really about the people feeling really great as they move through the spaces. And so, yes, there's linearity to the pathways, but there's also landscaping, and there's pockets of landscaping, and there's places to sit or to... step aside and look at something, look at something commemorating the Hilla Pavilion, for example, or another place to sit in the sun and just relax and chill after hearing some bad news or good news. And so basically be animated all the way, not just a bunch of row of trees and away we go, but it has to be animated so that people feel something along the way and feel good about it.

Yeah, and to be very clear, just given the configuration of the roads and streets in and around the hospital, my real interest is actually that it's seen as a bit of a cut through, if you will, than sort of walking along the sidewalk to the intersection and down that prevents pedestrianization rolling and walking. So not for necessarily patients or people accessing the hospital, but for people who see that it's been designed with pedestrianization in mind.

Well, the pathway will be clear, and there's lots of space for that for people. If you're busy and you just want to go straight through, then you're going straight through. Yeah, okay. You have the option to pull aside and linger. Yeah. But it's definitely a go.

Okay, I see someone else, and I do have one more question, so if you can be brief.

I just might add one little comment to that. You know, having worked there for a long time, I see lots of patients, families, but also staff in very intense times. And actually having areas like this to be able to get a breather, walk through, it is so healing, whether it's been a crisis that you've just heard or others. But for staff as well, it's very important.

Yeah, no, I appreciate that. That's a really important additional piece of context. Thank you. So on the bike lane, just to switch gears for a quick second, because it has been talked about in terms of moving it to the other side of the street. I've also heard mention of potentially additional traffic lights where there are now four-way stops. But one of the things I... haven't heard is what has the engagement been like with the medical facilities on the other side of tent? Because there are also, you know, skin cancer clinics, BC Cancer Agency that A lot of, every single one of those buildings has a parkade. There's many people coming and going every day. So I'm just wanting to make sure we're having the question asked here. Are we just going to potentially move the problem to the other side of the street and have someone else deal with it? Have we talked to them? Let's make sure we don't have this conversation in a vacuum. Any comments you have? I have about 30 seconds.

Just a quick comment about that is what we really want to do today is get into setting a goal for with transportation planning that during the coming months, we actually study the entire situation for the future, not just today. and talk to all the stakeholders and involve everybody that's required and do a thorough analysis and study of everything. Okay, but it hasn't been done yet. We've done a lot of it. We have talked to people across the street. We've talked to many people, but we need a goal here is what we're looking for.

Okay, that's my time.

We're at time. And so can we get a motion to extend this meeting until to hear final council questions? Councillor Klassen, seconded. Councillor Meiszner, council, is there any discussion? Great. All those in favour say yay. All those opposed say nay. Sorry, clerk, should I make this announcement now or after? Okay, thank you. Okay, great. Councillor Klassen.

Thanks very much. And first of all, I'll just start off by congratulating members of the foundation, physicians, and all the partners involved in this. I think there's been an incredible amount of work to get to this place, and so I'm very much looking forward to seeing the work advance. Don, you made a comment. about the campus development design being driven by medicine. And I want to sort of take issue with that comment because largely I've seen hospitals with their gigantic HVAC systems and ducting and what have you start to look like oil refineries rather than actually sort of great buildings. And so I wanted to just sort of talk to you a little bit about some of the things that can be done to try and make sure that this becomes a long-term, like this is going to be a building that's going to be around for 50 years. And it's a very important central part of our neighborhood. So I'm kind of curious to know how you intend to make this a beautiful part as much as a high-functioning part of our city.

Fortunately, we do more than just hospitals in our practice across the country in the Middle East. And so our objective is to take the functionality, because basically health care is inside-out design. But the architecture around it, et cetera, can be whatever it needs to be, to be inspiring, to reflect VGH's values, the city's values. and to address the goals. So it can be anything we want it to be. It's not designed yet, but there's no reason it needs to be a machine with oil refinery stuff sticking out.

Yeah, it becomes sort of less about being how many stories or how many beds, but about what the experience is around the building. I'm curious as to how you can... Our aging demographic is something that we have to live with right now and understand, and over at least the next 25 years, we're going to see that age advancing. So how is this campus going to respond to the need for being age-friendly? Being which friendly? Being age-friendly.

Yeah, so maybe I'll take that one. So what we are going to do in our design of new buildings is we will look to design them to be elder-friendly. There's a lot of best practice designs that really speak to creating spaces that are safe and healing for our geriatric population as well, knowing that, you know, we are a very busy campus, as you heard. We are going to create universal spaces. So if we get... more elderly people in a day than we accounted for in design, they can always go into another room that's equally designed the same way. So our approach to designing new buildings is going to be about universality and adaptability, and we will create design features that are elder-friendly in either the materials we use, the lighting we use, the colors we use, et cetera, and really look towards Don and his team to support us in that as we work with our stakeholders on that as well. I wanna talk about one fact that we are actually doing right now. is the emergency department. There's a way to certify for geriatric emergency sections of it. So we've actually got a clinical team that's doing that as we speak because that's very important.

Thanks very much. I am surprised with the kind of urgency that the Heather Pavilion components are being sort of dispensed with. Knowing fine architecture can sometimes incorporate. You have office space. You're going to need places to dine. or cafe to recreate people who are not going to be in their hospital rooms or the beds all the time. They want to meet with family members. The granite exterior of that building has something that's very sort of native to our region, and it also does give that life to it. So I'm just curious, is there not been even a portion of the building or something that could represent something very exciting on that sort of north side of the campus?

We would have to move it. Because the unfortunate part, the Headland Pavilion is right in the middle of the future. And as I said, we have big floor plates that need to sit on top of that site.

So just for time, Don, I heard you before respond to that about potentially taking some of the aspect of it. I just want to mention, because councillors always ask questions about child care, I know that... The 13th and William is the, we move forward with the idea of a 24-7 child care there. I remember getting excited response from members of the BCNU when we saw them at an event not long after. So clearly this is an area that we've done some actually really good work between that developer and VGH to try and make that happen. So that's exciting. I'm out of time. So thanks very much.

Thank you, Councillor Klassen. Councillor Frye.

Yeah, thank you. Great presentation, and thank you for all the work that you've been doing collectively. I want to just touch a little bit on the engagement. We talked about how a lot of the patients will be arriving by car, but I imagine a lot of patients will be arriving by subway soon enough once that's built. And I'm curious, lots of mentions of the Oak Street VGH station. I guess that's going to be the name, Oak VGH. And how folks are going to access. I know that there's mention here of like pedestrian ways along Laurel and Willow, both of which have more of an elevation gain. And I'm thinking about patients who may be less ambulatory, but, you know, still taking the train. How do we anticipate connecting folks from the SkyTrain to the hospital, especially if they have mobility challenges?

Thanks for the question. Kent McDougall, Special Projects Office. We don't have it in any detail. It is something we're aware of and putting forward in the policy is the potential of a tunnel connection. But that's more than just the Vancouver Coastal Health VGH itself as a landowner to make that connection. So it would involve other sites between the station. as well, potentially. So it's something we would continue to explore as an idea.

But I am correct in that Willow and Laurel are both more elevation game, and those are the streets that are identified for pedestrian, but they also have the most elevation relative to, say, Oak Street. Correct. They are uphill. Okay. But we're still going to prioritize the pedestrian... INTERFACE ON LAUREL AND WILLOW?

LAUREL AND WILLOW WITH THE GENERAL ALIGNMENTS OF THOSE STREETS AND STILL LEAVING LARGE CONTINGUOUS PARCELS AVAILABLE FOR HOSPITAL REDEVELOPMENT IS THE PATH PROPOSED IN THE POLICY. I THINK WE WOULD LOOK TO IMPROVE CONNECTIONS TO TRANSIT IN ANY WAY WE COULD, WHETHER THROUGH AN UNDERGROUND TUNNEL OR OTHER MEANS.

And I would love to replicate Councillor Bligh's shifting gears conversation around cycling. Do we anticipate that this might actually look to expanding cycling network maybe down the hill on Broadway to anticipate the kind of issues we're contemplating along 10th?

Great, thank you. Yeah, so we have direction from council to continue to plan for a future with bike lanes on Broadway. That wouldn't, like in terms of our analysis, that wouldn't replace the need for 10th Avenue. 10th Avenue has been a longstanding corridor even before it was a bikeway that was well used by people cycling. So what Broadway would do would be to provide an additional corridor for cycling and better access to the businesses and Broadway subway and things like that.

And now turning over a leaf to talk about pops and parks. Sorry, this is a bad pun. And I appreciate that some of the charm of VGH is the access to green space and the wellness. And how does the management of these public open spaces work? Is this going to be entirely the responsibility of Vancouver General Hospital? Or is it a mix of park board? How do we anticipate some of this will play out?

Thanks for the question. Ken McDougall, Special Projects Office. That is a good question. It's a topic of discussion that I think we're continuing to have, exactly how the mechanics, how these would be secured, how they are managed. VGH does have a desire to maintain ownership of many of these spaces, particularly the large interim spaces proposed, which allow for future redevelopment. in another generation, if you will. It allows a fallow field approach where they could contemplate what that next phase looks like into the future. So it is that next step of the conversation, I think, for us that would come forward with the rezoning application in 2027 would be details about how these spaces, their management, and how that would work.

And any tree canopy, of course, would remain park board, that kind of maintenance as far as public trees? Correct. Yes. Okay. Great.

Thank you. Thank you.

Thanks very much. Councillor Orr.

Thanks, yeah. Counselor Klassen asked a few of my questions around the pavilion. I know we've had conversations around this, but I think in terms of a way to balance kind of memorializing the heritage aspect of the pavilion with, of course, the traumatic experiences of our First Nations and a way to do that sort of in a kind of a sensitive way I think I mentioned sort of how the woodlands development kind of preserved a part of the building materials, actually the granite, and used that granite as a sort of a marker. I was wondering what kind of approaches that you've explored around finding that balance.

We've started exploring. The detailed work is going to be done this fall prior to the actual rezoning in the new year. So a few more months of work to do.

But is that something that you're going to sort of explore, like keeping some of the materials and the character without sort of, you know, relitigating that past?

Yeah, absolutely. And there's lots of great examples around the country, the continent. And so we're going to be exploring that with VGH and with our our partners at the city as well.

Okay, thanks. And then following on from Councillor Fry's talk around transportation and that connection, I know I imagine that the connection would be you'd have to look at other properties, but also funding, I would imagine, would come from, would that be TransLink? Would that be private funding to build that tunnel?

Yeah, thanks for the question. Like, conceptually, it's a difficult connection to make from the hospital to the station at Laurel and Broadway, just given the grades for people with mobility issues. So, like, conceptually, it's an idea we want to continue to explore and then look at how we might be able to connect that in with future hospital development and with the SkyTrain station, where funding would come from that's, you know, still very much available.

While I have you up, obviously we have the new SkyTrain and obviously we also have 24-7 bus service east-west on Broadway. What about north-south, like 24-7 bus service on Oak? Has that been contemplated by the city and TransLink?

Yeah, in TransLink's Access for Everyone plan, they do locate expanding the night bus system to try to hit more of the region, connect people, particularly people who have off-hours jobs, to be able to kind of come and go. Somewhere like the hospital is really important for people to access kind of off-hours. So we continue to talk to TransLink about that.

Great, thank you.

Councillor Malooney.

Thanks very much. My questions are for the Director of Transport. Can you run us through what the significance is of 10th Avenue for cyclists and what alternative routes there are for cyclists?

Yeah, so 10th Avenue is one of our busiest bikeways within the city. It's kind of our major east-west connection through the center of the city. It connects in major employment centers with a lot of the rest of the city. So VGH itself and the City Hall Precinct. Central Broadway is just one of our biggest employment centers. So it really is a... critical routes and we saw that again even before it was a bikeway we saw a lot of people cycling on 10th avenue so we as part of the 10th avenue bikeway we are also trying to we agreed that we would be also trying to improve parallel corridors so 14th avenue we implemented the first phase of it at a similar time are going to continue to expand that out planning for bike lanes on broadway off Broadway routes, planning for improvements there. But just in terms of 10th Avenue, there's a lot of demand that the corridor serves really well.

And can you run us through what consultation was undertaken in settling on the current configuration?

Yes, we had a multi-phase engagement process, kind of three phases plus an additional phase where we hired an independent consultant to work with us and the Hospital of Vancouver Coastal Health and BC Cancer to kind of work through all of those issues. There are a ton of issues along the corridor, including, you know, obviously emergency access and loading on the corridor and cycling through the corridor on people with disabilities, mobility impairments. travelling across 10th Avenue. So it was a lot of engagement to land on the concept that's in place right now. So if we're considering something different, we'd also want to consider how we engage the various communities who would have an interest in this.

Okay. And obviously safety considerations are paramount when reconfiguring transport routes. Council, doesn't conventionally provide specific direction on the design of cycling infrastructure, do we?

Not typically. Sometimes we will bring really tricky challenges to council. So a really important facility like a recent one would be Granville Connector where there were a lot of different options about how we could move forward with a lot of different trade-offs and interests. But, yeah, quite often we implement it based on council policy.

All right. And just perhaps remind me, so the cost of that, the current configuration, was it $20 million?

It was about $10 million, more or less.

And then you said it would probably be...

Just ballpark, like we haven't done any design, but construction costs have gone up and we'd be having to essentially move the whole roadway over. There would be more tree impacts, you know, different impacts in terms of access to driveways and other streets and things. So there'd be a lot of work that we'd need to do to even get a really good ballpark of what the cost would be. But I expect it would be more than what we spent already, probably significantly more.

And who would be responsible for that expenditure?

Yeah, I think that's a question we'd want to continue to talk to the hospital about. If we see an option that would improve safety on the corridor for everyone, we'd want to talk to them about that. We've seen a big safety improvement since we implemented the bike lanes. We saw transportation injuries drop by about 60% along the corridor, which was a great outcome. So in terms of city funding, unless we saw something that would dramatically reduce collisions, like I would struggle to invest a lot of city funding into a reconfiguration of 10th Avenue.

Okay, and perhaps my next question is for planning. Can you remind me of what the amenity contributions that are likely to come out of the redevelopment of VCH?

Sure, Ken McTugall, Special Projects Office. We're still very much dealing with the plan and not the rezoning, so this is probably a very high-level estimate, but based on the floor area proposed, it's in the $7 million to $9 million from a CAC, which for facilities like this, we pursue a nominal rate. There are high rates for residential developments that you would see. So it's in that range that we would estimate at this point, and it would come forward with the rezoning.

Sorry. And that would be dealt with during the design?

Correct.

Right. That suits me. Thanks very much. Councillor Kirby Young.

Yeah, thanks. I have one question following up on that. And previous councils, I believe it was two councils ago if I'm correct, had a fairly, I think, vigorous debate with respects to the bike lane changes at that time. Did VCH have a position on that at that point? My question is to VCH.

BCH was involved in the original plan that was subsequently implemented. We got to a point where we could negotiate some of the things that were important to us. It was clear at the time that the bike lane was going in. There was no ability to push back on that it was going to be unidirectional. And I think one of the things we would like to point out, we are not asking that the bike lane move off of 10th completely. We understand. It's a busy bike thoroughfare. We simply want it moved off the south side of 10th where we have two entrances into Emerge. We have two loading docks. We have a very busy street coming off of Laurel that separates the Diamond Centre and the Research Pavilion with the Jim Pattison Pavilion. It's just a very busy avenue for bikes. And so what we're asking is that the south side bike lane be moved, and we moved to a bi-directional bike lane on 10th Avenue. What we landed up doing, getting back to your initial question, is when we did agree on the design that went in there, one of the things VGH was able to negotiate was more drop-off spaces in front of the eye care centre and more drop-off spaces around the corner from the eye care centre. We were able to get some additional short-term parking along 10th Avenue because, as we've talked previously, we have a lot of patients that are not going to take transit. They are not going to take their bike. They are going to drive. Dropping patients off in the emergency department, if I'm bringing someone there, I'm going to drop them off. Then I have to go find someplace to park because there isn't long-term parking there. So it's just a very busy, busy roadway. begin with and a busy cycling roadway so we just feel strongly that we need the south side bike lane moved to the north and we are willing to do the work that we have to do with our city colleagues to come up with the safest plan possible and we will engage the stakeholders Okay, so globally, we're probably, it's extremely rare to have a bike lane in front of an ambulance entrance. I think we're one of the only hospitals in the world, maybe a couple others, but we did a search. But it's very, very unusual to have bike lanes right in front of ambulances trying to come into hospitals.

I would imagine, so just reflecting back, you are wanting to have this discussion, and tell me if I'm phrasing this correctly, not just from a safety perspective, but also for patient care, given the nature of what people are attending the various facilities for, correct?

Correct. And one of the things I think is a challenge for us is we aren't able to produce the data to show that it actually is still a dangerous bike lane. We had one of our senior VGH employees actually hit a cyclist. We had an ambulance three weeks ago where a cyclist ran into an ambulance coming out of the emergency department. So we just feel there's a safer option for the 10th Avenue bike lane. That's what we're asking.

Thank you. I appreciate this perspective. Thank you. Thank you. Counselor Orr.

Thanks. Just following on that discussion with my remaining time, are my bidirectional bike lanes generally more safe?

so typically we don't like to install bi-directional bike lanes on two-way streets the added conflicts that that creates tend to make them less safe we've seen that where we have done it so it is one of the things that we'd want to consider continue to talk about if we did look at bi-directional bike lane typically those can work well on a one-way street. Kind of regardless of where the bike lanes are on 10th Avenue, there's going to be a lot of vehicles crossing over those bike lanes and a lot of pedestrians crossing over those bike lanes. So whether they're crossing from, kind of coming from Broadway, crossing the bike lanes or turning off of 10th Avenue onto one of those streets, we would want to be sure that what we landed on was overall at least as safe as what's out there. So that's what we'd want to look at.

And in terms of liability, if there is a sort of a council direction around the bike lanes, what sort of legal opinions have either the city or VGH sort of explored?

Well, I guess council...

Council has the ability to make decisions like this from a policy perspective. So I don't know. I wouldn't expect there to be a significant liability issue if we're acting in good faith. Okay. And with 30 seconds left, have you explored the liability of that?

We have not. We are looking for the opportunity to work with the city on what a safer option might be, at which time we will do full due diligence on that component as well.

Clerk 13:16:34

Thank you.

Okay, thank you, Councillor. Okay, that concludes our questions. So just a couple of items before we adjourn, or not adjourn, rather recess until three o'clock when we will hear from speakers and then have a final debate and decision on this item. Staff have advised that report number nine, 122 East Hastings Liquor License Amendment, Permanent hour change is no longer required and will be withdrawn from today's agenda. The report is no longer required at the request of the license holder. So we will, again, recess council until 3 p.m. and we will start in camera at 1.15 p.m.

Clerk 13:17:27

Thanks very much.

The meeting is in recess.

Clerk 13:34:29

Thank you.

The meeting is in recess.

Thank you.

Clerk 13:50:50

The meeting is in recess.

The meeting is in recess.

Thank you.

The meeting is in recess.

Clerk 14:35:57

The meeting is in recess.

Thank you.

Clerk 14:50:59

The meeting is in recess.

The meeting is in recess.

Thank you.

The meeting is in recess.

Clerk 15:36:06

The meeting is in recess.

Thank you.

The meeting is in recess.

Welcome to TELUS conferencing. Hello, Tamara. Can you hear me?

Yes, I can hear you. Can you hear me? Echo, echo, Charlie. I can hear you. Thank you. Okay, perfect. Okay.

Welcome back, everyone. So we are on item two again, and we will now hear from registered speakers for this report. So public speakers should state whether they support or oppose the recommendations and may only speak once. I will ask, I'll also ask speakers if they are residents of Vancouver, if it's not so noted on the speakers list. So our first public speaker is Andrea. Thank you.

Good afternoon Mayor and Council. My name is Andrea Bizayon and I'm an operations director at Vancouver General Hospital and a registered nurse by background. I am not a resident of Vancouver. Thank you for the opportunity to speak to the Vancouver General Hospital campus rezoning plans from the lands of the Coast Salish people, the Musqueam, Squamish, and TTsleil-Waututh nations. As a longstanding employee of Vancouver General Hospital, I'd like to express my strong support for this application and the future vision it sets out for the campus. The proposed rezoning is essential to supporting the continued advancement of patient care through innovation, modernization, and the ability to recruit and retain highly skilled and diverse health care workforce. As health care delivery continues to evolve, it's critical that the physical environment of our hospital campus enables us to deliver safe, contemporary, and culturally responsive care for the communities we serve. I'm aware that some members of the community have advocated for the preservation of the Heather Pavilion due to its historical significance and its role in education and learning. As a graduate of the Vancouver General Hospital School of Nursing class of February 1987, I have deep personal and professional connections to the campus and completed many clinical rotations within the Heather Pavilion, including D8-9, A5, C5, and others. However, I can say with confidence that my most meaningful learning experiences were not defined by the building itself. They were shaped by the mentors who guided me, the teachers who challenged me, and more importantly, the patients and families who entrusted me with their care. It's these human connections rather than the bricks and mortar that form the true legacy of learning at BGH. As I continue my own journey in reconciliation, I believe it's important to thoroughly consider what our physical spaces represent. In this context, I support the removal of outdated infrastructure and the opportunity to replace it with facilities that more clearly acknowledge the complex histories of healthcare delivery, including the experiences of our Indigenous patients. New development should intentionally support Indigenous-led culturally safe and culturally responsive models of care while also advancing medical excellence and innovation. Replacing aging structures with purpose-built facilities that reflect these values is an important step towards reconciliation and towards creating a healthcare environment that's inclusive, respectful, and forward-thinking. Thank you again for the opportunity to provide input to this important initiative and for considering the perspectives of those that have dedicated their career to serving patients and the broader community at Vancouver General Hospital. Thank you.

Clerk 16:03:42

Thank you very much. Our next speaker is speaker number two, Philip Sweeney.

Good morning, Mayor and Councillors. My name is Philip Sweeney. I am a resident of Vancouver. I am also an Operations Director for GF Strong and Ambulatory Care at VGH, working for Vancouver Coastal Health. Thank you for the opportunity to speak to the Vancouver General Hospital's campus rezoning plan and the lands of the Coast Salish peoples, the Musqueam, Squamish, and TTsleil-Waututh nations. As a longstanding employee of VGH, I would like to express my strong support for this application and for the future vision it sets out for the campus. I also believe that the proposed rezoning is essential for the ongoing advancement of patient care, allowing us to continue to innovate and modernize our services for decades to come. This work will further support our ability to recruit and retain our ever-growing, highly skilled, diverse healthcare team. It is crucial that the physical environment of our hospital campus facilitates public safety externally while continuing the evolution of providing culturally safe, contemporary, and responsive care for the communities we serve. I am speaking today about my experience, not as an operations director of VCH, but rather as an avid cyclist and commuter, having commuted to and from VGH by bike for the last 18 years, using Vancouver's usually excellent cycle pathway network. My concerns relate specifically to the cycle pathways along 10th Avenue, which run through the northern edge of the proposed rezoning plan. The section of 10th Avenue bike route from Oak to Heather is, to be frank, extremely dangerous and very scary. I actually avoid it at all costs. The current setup puts cyclists in harm's way seven times between Oak and Heather when you're heading east. The intersection at Laurel Street, two entrances to emergency, the loading bay for the Jim Patterson Pavilion, the loading bay exit and the thoroughfare for the Leon Blackmore Pavilion. and the parking lot between Blue Sun and the Old Heather Pavilion. These are all high-risk areas for cycle-versus-car or cycle-versus-pedestrian incidents. To highlight the magnitude of this issue, in addition to what we heard this morning, I have seen ambulances have to wait for cyclists to zip by before being able to enter the VGH emergency area ambulance bay. Westbound cyclists only has three potential issues in comparison. I am also a pedestrian who regularly crosses 10th Avenue to check in my programs on the north side of 10th Ave. It is just as dangerous. Cyclists, e-scooters, e-bikes are careening along the bike path, weaving in and out as they follow the path. For an analogy, it's like playing a real-life game of Frogger, trying to avoid all the vehicles, bikes, and scooters crossing 10th Avenue, only with no second chances. The buildings on the north side of 10th Avenue care for patients with vision impairment and arthritis. Many of these patients park in the VGH parkade on 12th Avenue, and then they walk over to their appointments. This population has difficulty navigating fast-moving objects and slow reaction times. So unfortunately, it's an accident waiting to happen. I strongly encourage the City of Vancouver to consider revising the 10th Avenue cycle route to put both of the east and west on the north side. Thank you very much for considering my input.

Clerk 16:06:55

Thank you very much.

And as an aside, thank you for the work you do at GF Strong. On a personal note, my mom got really sick with encephalitis, and she spent 11 months at GF Strong. And I fully understand the impact that you have on a lot of people. So thank you. Speaker number three, Anthony Robert Norfolk.

Thank you. Thank you, Mayor and Council.

Excuse me. Too bad. I'll try not to get myself all choked up. I don't know why.

Oh. I wasn't speaking, so I didn't know that I was in need. My apologies.

Thank you.

I've never done that before.

I'm being served by the mayor. Wonderful. My name's Anthony Norfolk. I live in Vancouver. I have, as my message to you all, which I hope you received, as you will gather, I have been involved in advocating for the Heather Pavilion for decades. But I think we need to start off with clearing up one misunderstanding. The Heather Pavilion is not designated. It is a portion, the original portion of the pavilion, the Fairview building, that is what has been designated. So when someone says that 40%, the Heather Pavilion takes up 40% of the site, of the VGH site, What are we talking about? What is 40% of what?

Because the much, much smaller Fairview building is what is in play here.

The staff report is correct in saying it's a portion of the Heather Pavilion. So let's start talking about the Fairview building. not the Heather Pavilion. So the Fairview building is not 40% of anything, let alone the fact that I suspect that 40% is wrong. Now, don't get me wrong. At the age of 84, I am a consumer of services from VGH, which I much appreciate. They are super. Absolutely. But I don't see why... the Fairview Pavilion, the Fairview building, has to go to achieve all that VGH would like to achieve. It is a minuscule portion of the site. Its value has been spoken to and passed on by previous council when designating it. That is rare. It's been through all the processes. And it may not have been used for care for a long time, but it is still occupied and used.

I did precipitate the production for the city quite a while ago of a report by Richard Henriquez that lists the uses to which that building can be put ancillary uses to the broader uses of the hospital.

There are, as someone this morning pointed out, there are examples where heritage buildings have been enclosed, enwrapped in larger buildings. There is absolutely no reason why the Fairview building cannot be treated in the same fashion.

And in fact, Vancouver Coastal Health itself commissioned a report in detail about restoring the building. Detailed report.

I have it. I'm sure it's available to staff.

Because I certainly have Richard Henriquez's report here. You know, it's yay thick.

There is no real valid reason for destroying a designated building. I don't know that it's ever been done. demolishing a designated heritage building. So when I look at the report, I'm simply asking you not to consider the repeal of the designation bylaw. Just simply refrain from supporting this part of the council report. That's my request.

Clerk 16:12:39

Thank you very much. Okay. Speaker number four, Angus Thompson.

Speaker four is not on the line.

Clerk 16:12:50

Not on the line. Okay. Speaker number five, Brianne LaPierre.

Hello, Mayor and Council. My name is Brianne, and I'm speaking today in support of the Vancouver General Hospital Campus Renewal Project. I'm also a member of the Vancouver Heritage Commission, although I'm speaking today in my personal capacity. BGH is one of the most important public institutions in our province. Every day it serves not only Vancouver residents, but patients from across BC, and this proposal establishes a thoughtful, long-term framework to modernize and renew the campus over the coming decades. As a member of the Vancouver Heritage Commission, I know we all bring different perspectives on how to best support our city. We share a commitment to preserving Vancouver's history while ensuring it continues to evolve to meet the needs of future generations. When this project was brought to the commission, I advocated in support of this proposal because I believe heritage conservation and responsible city building goes hand in hand. Heritage is about more than preserving individual buildings. It is about preserving the stories and places that have shaped our city. The Heather Pavilion has served Vancouver with distinction for more than a century and its legacy deserves to be recognized. But we also have to be honest about the reality of the building today. The Heather Pavilion has not been used for patient care for more than 20 years and VCH has determined that its floor plans, circulation systems, and mechanical infrastructure are functionally obsolete. It was built in 1906 for a completely different era of medicine. At some point, preserving a building for its own sake began

I believe our responsibility is to honor its history while ensuring VGH has a modern facility needed to save lives and provide patients and healthcare professionals with the standard of care they deserve. This proposal thoughtfully balances those objectives. It creates a pathway to replace modern aging healthcare infrastructure with modern facilities while improving accessibility, creating new open spaces, and strengthening climate resilience. The population is growing and health care demands are increasing, and facilities built decades ago need to be renewed to meet modern standards. This project does just that. The decision Council makes today will have an impact for generations, and I respectfully encourage Council to support this application. Thank you very much.

Clerk 16:15:04

Thank you very much. Speaking number six, Elliot Klein.

yeah hi my name is ellie klein i'm a resident of east vancouver i live near uh and bike through the develop the general area of vgh pretty regularly once or twice a week um i strongly support this uh this motion i think that plan to modernize and replace any of these uh facilities is definitely beneficial given the growing health care demands that our city faces as it grows and as the population generally is aging And I think the part that I am most interested in is just the general revitalization of the campus area. Now, one thing I would just kind of want to draw some emphasis to, I've heard this brought up already a few times today, but I just wanted to get my own experiences as a cyclist regularly biking through West 10th. My experience heading West, not much of a problem. You're on the North side of the street and you're not generally interfering with any of the access the emergency or hospital spaces. But when I'm biking east on the south side, I'm constantly worried about kind of like crashing into or hitting anybody who's coming in and out of the hospital emergency areas. The biggest problem being is because the bike... lane heads downhill from the east side. So you're catching a lot of speed coming from Oak and you are heading down in the first building that you pass by on the south on the south bike lane is the emergency building or the emergency entrance. as well as other buildings that come up later on, and lots of pedestrian crosswalks. And this just does not really create a conducive environment for cycling, and it makes it more dangerous for any of the hospital services, emergency vehicles, even just people who are maybe walking out of the hospital, nurses who are leaving for break. It's just a dangerous environment. And so I've heard a lot of people propose something that I do believe also is a very good solution, is a bidirectional bike lane on the north side of 10th. I think that this would be beneficial because there's less general vehicle traffic coming in and out of properties on the north side, and also it creates less directions people need to look in when you've got the vehicle traffic traveling on that street. I know whenever I get to any intersection on my bike, you've got cars that are looking one way for the cars on the other way. They're looking for bikes coming from two directions on two sides of the street. It's just incredibly confusing. And I go through the 10th Avenue bikeway all the way out to Kitsilano, all the way out to Commercial. There are many parts of this bike lane that are bidirectional, and they work where the bidirectional is on one side of the street. It works very effectively. It's much safer, and it's a much more conducive way to bike. And I think that if we are looking to revitalize this area, I think that... reshaping and redesigning the bike lane to be bi-directional on the north side should be the main priority but apart from that i agree and support this development thank you very much speaking number seven daniel and then good afternoon mayor and council my name is daniel i'm not a resident of vancouver i reside on the uel and i'm here today to speak in support of the vgh campus renewal proposal thank you for your time TGH is one of the most important healthcare facilities in BC. It serves not only Vancouver residents, but patients from across the province who require specialized and lifesaving care. At the same time, our population is growing and aging. The healthcare infrastructure we rely on today was built for a different era. If we want our healthcare system to continue meeting the needs of future generations, we need to invest in modern facilities now, other than waiting until buildings become inadequate. According to the staff report, FGH campus buildings and infrastructure are aging, with 80% of inpatient beds located in facilities built between 1953 and 1989. Major infrastructure projects require thoughtful planning, but delaying renewal will only make future challenges more difficult and more expensive to address. I encourage council to support this renewal proposal so this essential hospital can continue providing world-class care for decades to come. Thank you very much for your time.

Great, thank you.

Clerk 16:19:15

And finally, speaker number eight, Neil Wiles.

Apologies, can you hear me?

We can hear you great, Neil. Please go ahead.

excellent excellent thank you good afternoon mayor and council uh my name is neil wild i'm with the mount pleasant business improvement association i will do my best to be very very brief i'm here to speak in support of the amendments uh to the broadway plan with regards to the vancouver general hospital campus Sadly, I don't think it'll be the last time that we'll be looking for amendments to the Broadway plan. On the city's own website, Broadway plan states that the area can see up to 64,000 new residents and 45,000 additional jobs. We are in this area, and this area has already seen dramatic growth for the past decade. With that said, expanding services, especially in some of the aging facilities at VGH, seems only logical. The campus can only get as big as it can get because that's the size that it is. We do respect heritage aspects. We do respect them in our own neighbourhood, but I think sometimes the needs of the hospital and the greater community are going to outweigh that. With that said, we fully support this and look forward to seeing these changes over the next 40 years to help the community of Mount Pleasant. Thank you very much and have a great day.

Thank you very much. Okay, and so that's the end of our speakers list. I'd like to thank everyone for coming to speak to council. Would someone like to move a motion? Great, I think that was Councillor Kirby-Young, seconded by Councillor Klassen. Council, is there any discussion?

Clerk 16:21:05

Councillor Domenato, please go ahead.

Thank you. I've circulated an amendment to the report, and so I was trying to log in here. And it is in response to considerations raised earlier on with respect to West 10th in particular. Sorry, can I put you on pause for one second?

I'm just going to restart your timer in the amendment queue. Please go ahead. Sorry about that.

So simply, it's a resolution to address considerations raised about mitigating pedestrian cyclists' vehicle conflicts within the VGH campus, in particular with consideration to West 10th and looking at a bidirectional bike lane as well as one-way vehicle traffic. And so I've circulated that to all of council for consideration. I think it responds to... Questions and concerns that we heard raised and I think an earnest desire to continue that dialogue around how we ensure safety for all in this area that is very very busy and will be probably busier in the future with the expansion of the campus so That's for count That's it council any discussion on the amendment Seeing no one in the queue I'm

Clerk 16:22:34

Ah, okay. So, Councillor Maloney, please go ahead.

Thanks. Yeah, I'm uncomfortable constraining staff with this direction. But really, this whole situation puts this council's decision, I think 2023 decision, not to put bike lanes on Broadway, particularly between Yukon and older streets, look even more unfortunate. We've heard today that a great deal of consultation took place in coming up with the current configuration, which has reduced crashes by 60%, according to ICBC statistics, not personal anecdotes. According to ICBC data, there are far more traffic incidents on both Broadway and 12th than on 10th in the VGH area. Staff have advised that bi-directional bike lanes are more dangerous when the street is not one way. And our staff have reservations about this. They're paid by the city to provide non-partisan expert advice. And with respect, the traffic engineering consultant hired by the hospital was hired to provide advice about how to move the bike lane to the far side of the road, taking into account the interests of the hospital primarily. An unprotected bike lane has been in front of St Paul's emergency entrance on Burrard Street for a long time. It does get less traffic because there are options. It has an unprotected bike lane in front of it, but there's an alternative safer bike route, 1 Street over on Hornby Street. We have a bike route four blocks away on 14th that doesn't go as far as 10th does, so it doesn't attract as much traffic. traffic because of the inconvenience for cyclists. And unfortunately, we don't have a bike lane on Broadway, again, thanks to a vote of this council, which would have been a good idea given that cyclists are going to have to put up with at least a decade of construction at VGH affecting their safety and convenience on 10th.

Thank you very much. Okay. Seeing no one else in the queue.

Clerk 16:24:54

Right. Sorry. Do we know who's on the queue? Because I'm not seeing anyone on here right now.

We need a couple of minutes or.

only have councillor dominato on the main queue oh okay okay well i'll take a two-minute recess just to okay yeah thank you thank you

Okay.

Can I get started, though? Is Councillor Meiszner the first one? Great. Thank you. Okay. Sorry for the delay. Councillor Meiszner, please go ahead.

Yeah, thank you. I am going to support this amendment from Councillor Domenato because we've heard clearly from VGH staff that are there, gosh, probably every day of the year. I know how hardworking you all are. and about the conflicts that are occurring with the current configuration of the unidirectional bike lane. And I think exploring moving the bike lane to a bidirectional format on the north side of 10th is certainly worth exploring, and I think those discussions should be part of this conversation. So I appreciate this amendment, and I'm very supportive of it. to reduce those conflicts between emergency vehicles and cyclists, as we've heard from some of our speakers today. Thanks. Thank you, Councillor Kirby-Young.

Yeah, thanks, Mayor. I'll be brief, and I think that it's incumbent on Council to look at exploration for this. It's struck by the irony and also how sad it is that a VGH employee, who I know healthcare professionals are in the business of saving, and supporting the health of people coincided or collided with a cyclist. Like that is troublesome, and I'm sure it was pretty traumatic for the staff person as well to have that experience. And it was also quite compelling. I think we heard that in some of the research there wasn't an example identified where there is a major hospital that has a bike lane running, a separated one running directly across where we have an emergency situation. Department so I think that's fairly compelling I know that this was a really live debate a couple of councils ago because of the nature of not just VGH but the adjacent facilities and you've got a lot of folks in there that are going for fairly significant treatments or may have mobility issues the arthritis center spinal cords skin care PC cancer and others and I know there was concern at the time and it You know, I'd sort of try to apply the, I'm not a medical professional or a transportation engineer, but I try to apply the common sense perspective. And when you have vulnerable populations that are in and around an area and you know that your population is going to be growing and medical services will only continue to increase in importance, it doesn't make a lot of sense to put something in that's going to create conflict. So I think there's enough of a grace of time here, I think, to explore and look at this option and see if it's viable. And I also think it might be helpful to inform future City of Vancouver transportation planning. It's great to have separated bike lanes and have them on both sides of the street where space allows, but we also want to increase our cycling infrastructure in general in other areas in the city, and we don't always have space on all of our roadways to do that, fully separated on both sides necessarily. We've done it, for example, it's been a priority for Council on the Granville Street Bridge and... other areas in key infrastructure where we can, but I think this may actually potentially open up other opportunities to do it in space-constrained areas. So I think it's a good exploration to look at, and I support doing that. I do think it's very important to sort of get that work underway and provide the direction because it will help with the planning. And we know that... having some sort of key parameters defined around projects is really important in major capital projects today because they are increasingly complex to deliver and they become increasingly expensive over time. So I think an early exploration of that actually should hopefully help the finances as opposed to trying to deal with something down the road and not sort of like tackling it up front. So I appreciate Councillor Dominato bringing the amendment and I do support it. Thank you.

Thank you, Councillor Zhoul. I think I'm on the main queue, not amendment queue. But I support this amendment. Thank you, Councillor Maloney.

No, I've already spoken to the amendment.

Thank you, Councillor Claston. Sorry, I'm supposed to be on the main queue. Okay, Mayor. Councillor Bligh.

Yeah, thanks very much. Sorry, I had to just step out during that recess. But a point of information through you, Chair, to staff on this amendment. I just want to clarify, it seems like the language is pretty open-ended in this. It's not saying, Paul, I can see you. Maybe, Paul, to you. I can see your head peeking over there. Look, there's been lots of discussion about this. I think it's worthy of continued conversation. There's obviously significant cost in the multimillion dollar range for movement of this, the spike lane, if that becomes the optimal decision, as well as one way on 10th has a number of considerations. So I guess I'm just asking in the language provided here. To me, the key words are to continue discussions, essentially, with options and then the consideration of. So they're all pretty like noncommittal, open-ended. Is that the kind of direction you think is helpful?

Yeah, that's how I would read that. And particularly, you know, looking to mitigating conflicts, whenever there's a conflict point, there's never, it's never 100% safe. It's something we wanted to do anyway, was look at how through development we can improve the bike lane. And we want to continue to talk to VGH about what those options are. So this leaves it quite open, I think, for improvements.

Yeah, okay. Okay, thank you. That's helpful. I'm willing to support this because I do think we're in very early stages and we should continue the conversation. You know, it's not lost on me the amount of calls we actually are hearing about these days in terms of injury with Lime scooters. I have to say in this emergency room is probably dealing with a significant spike in whether it's to do with the recent tourism summer, what have you. But it's not lost on me how much you're dealing with active transportation accidents that are had traumas and things like that unrelated to this bike lane. So it just seems like there's a lot happening in this space. We should keep the conversation going. But I think we have to recognize that cycling is actually maybe not the biggest risk right now in terms of active transportation across the city. We're hearing more and more that scooters are eclipsing cycling accidents. I think we do need to keep this conversation going and maybe there's a future decision actually around the choices we've made in regards to what we allow on our streets, not just how they move across the city. So I'll leave it there. Thank you.

Thank you. Councillor Maloney.

Thanks. I'm sorry, I'm not quite sure how much time I have left, but I just have a question for Paul through point of information.

So the capital, I want to know about the effect on staff resources in terms of this area of expertise in our city because I understand that we're only planning to undertake 20 kilometres of both new cycling routes and upgraded cycling routes in our capital plan over the next four years, which is a disappointingly small amount. And I understand that one of the constraints is staff capacity. So if we redesign this, how does that affect staff capacity and potentially put back other projects that might improve the safety of cyclists within our city?

That's a good question. With this direction, like in the plan, we'd identified that we hadn't gotten to the end of our conversation with VGH and had proposed that we would continue to work with them on it. It will take some staff resources. We'll hopefully be in a place where we can deliver the capital plan fully and do this work. But we haven't fully scoped out what this investigation is going to look like.

Okay, thanks very much.

Thank you. Okay, seeing no one else in the queue, we will put Councillor Domonato's amendment to vote.

Clerk 16:35:32

If you can please go to the voting panel.

Great, and the amendment passes with Councillors Maloney in opposition and Councillor Orr abstaining. So, Councillor Domonato.

I have nothing further at this time. Thank you.

Thank you. Councillor Meiszner.

Nothing further either. Thank you.

Councillor Maloney.

Thanks. Is this my last opportunity to speak to the motion?

Yes, unless there's another amendment.

I'm sorry?

Unless there's another amendment or whatever.

I don't have another amendment. I contemplated one about putting bike lanes on Broadway, but I'm holding my fire on that. I just wanted to express my enthusiastic support for the alteration of the Broadway plan to include the rebuild of VGH. I think that it's incredibly important that we get this going as quickly as possible because I'm deeply uncomfortable about the condition of the buildings. given that if we have a big earthquake, hopefully that won't happen any time in the next few decades so that we can have a suitable set of emergency services buildings where we can properly respond instead of having those buildings in danger as well. I think that... Obviously, the conditions that staff are working in and the conditions that patients have to deal with are very poor and very difficult. So it's with, yes, great enthusiasm that I'll be voting in favour of this. Thank you.

Councillor Clarson.

Thanks very much, Mayor, and I just want to thank staff. for bringing forward this important long-term vision for the Vancouver General Hospital campus. This is really one of the most important institutions in our city, and I think we as a city should be grateful for both the employment and also the health care services that it brings to our city. And I know that it serves patients from both Vancouver and across BC, and is a place where thousands of families experience life's greatest joys and its greatest challenges. In fact, Vancouver General Hospital was where I was born in the early 1960s, and my parents had their first apartment on 12th Avenue nearby the hospital. So I have a fairly long connection to the place. We heard a comment today that the hospital design is driven by medicine, and that's important. Clinical care, research, and patient outcomes must always come first. But I also think the great hospitals help shape great cities. And VGH is more than a collection of buildings or beds. It has to be seen as a part of Vancouver's urban fabric. The streets, the public spaces, the landscaping, and architecture all contribute to the experience of patients, families, visitors, and healthcare professionals, of course, who work there every day. Thoughtful urban design can contribute to healing, create a welcoming environment, and strengthen the surrounding neighborhood. And this is what I believe we should be aspiring to. Vancouver Coastal Health plays an extraordinary role in delivering world-class care, and as I say, we're very lucky to have it. But the conditions in the hospital today, as we know, are not conducive to providing quality care or even a happy workplace. So I'd like to acknowledge the VGH and UBC Hospital Foundation for its leadership in securing the philanthropic support that helps fund new equipment, research, and future facilities. And your collective work will help to build one of Canada's leading health care campuses. So looking ahead, we know that the Broadway Subway is an incredibly exciting part of this community that will help transform access to the campus. It will become even more connected for patients, health care workers, researchers, students, visitors, and strengthening its role as one of Canada's premier centers for health care and innovation. I also recognize the concerns that have been expressed, including myself, regarding the Heather Pavilion. I have a genuine appreciation for Vancouver's architectural heritage, and I regret that we could be losing that. But I'm heartened by the fact that we're having conversations about recognizing that heritage in some way. And we talked about the granite blocks, of course. I understand that the campus must continue to evolve to meet the health care needs of future generations, and I believe this framework strikes an appropriate balance. This policy positions the campus well and adds to Vancouver's health care needs for decades to come. So thanks to everyone who contributed to this work, and I'll be very pleased to support this. Thank you. Thank you, Councillor Kirby-Young.

Yeah, thanks. I'll be brief because I know we have a lot of business. I just want to express gratitude for the plan. I know it's almost 125 years ago now that the original facility was developed and it's gone through upgrades and iterations over that time. But this is a substantive vision that will be built out over 30 years, so literally the next generation. So people will see their kids and grandkids being serviced here. And we have very acute pressures in our city, not just for housing, but for taking care of the folks that we have here in the city, and that's a really important part of it. So the city's role really is to try to be a good partner to create the right conditions that will enable sort of a world-class healthcare facility to be built. I also do want to recognize and appreciate the speakers, including the gentleman that spoke about and called it the Fairview building as well. There are trade-offs. These are not always easy ones to make. But I do think that there will be a very positive legacy, not just for health care, but hopefully creation of a real wellness environment in this area. Thank you.

Thank you very much, Councillor Zhou.

Yeah, thanks, Mayor. Also, I'm wholeheartedly supporting this report today. I'm actually so glad to see this plan finally come to council. It's been like a long overdue project, I think, for our city. As someone who spent 15 years working in operations in healthcare, I have a first-hand understanding. of the complexity of hospital operations. Hospitals never stop. They operate 24-7 while balancing patient care, emergency response, research, education, because you are teaching hospital and thousands of staff working together. I also understand how difficult it is to modernize an aging hospital while continuing to provide uninterrupted care. Unlike many other developments, you can't simply close a hospital for renovations. Every decision has to prioritize patient safety, continuity of care, and operational efficiency. That's why I believe this policy framework is so important. This report also makes very clear that the VGH campus has reached a very critical point. As we saw from this report, approximately 80% of inpatient beds are located in buildings constructed between 1953 and 1989. The ED was built in 1970s and no longer large enough to meet demand. And the healthcare demand is expected to grow by 25% by 2035. So clearly status quo isn't an option. So what Council is considering today is to establish a long-term policy framework that allows Vancouver Coastal Health to plan for the next 30 years while ensuring that future rezonings will still come back to Council for public review and approval. So there is a transparency and accountability there. And also for my question, I'm also really like the flexibility provided in this policy. I remember when I was supporting the Surrey Memorial Hospital, the redevelopment project there, the next day after the opening, the occupancy rate in the emergency department was already at 100%. So we need to really think about 30 years, even 50 years down the road. And I really appreciate the staff have worked to balance multiple objectives. And also, we need to give our healthcare system the flexibility to grow and adapt. We need to improve access for patients, visitors, staff, emergency services. We need better public space, stronger walking connections, and improved integration with the surrounding neighborhood. And I also appreciate this policy recognizes the unique transportation needs of a major regional hospital. It supports walking, cycling, transit improvement, while maintaining flexibility needed for ambulance, patient drop-off, deliveries, hospital operations, and also people who rely on driving to the hospital because of the mobility issue. Yeah, with my previous experience, I know that good hospital design isn't just about constructing something bigger. It's about creating space that helps doctors, nurses, and healthcare professionals deliver best patient care, reduce operational challenges, improve patient outcome, and prepare our healthcare system for the future. So ultimately, this report is about ensuring Vancouver General Hospital can continue serving British Columbians for generations to come. It provides a very thoughtful framework that balances healthcare needs, neighborhood integration, transportation, public space, sustainability, and heritage, while preserving council's oversight through our accountability and transparency mandate. So for this reason, I am pleased to support the recommendations, and also I want to express my deepest appreciation to staff, to the Vancouver General Hospital, and the Vancouver Coastal Health. Thank you for everything you have done for our province, for our city. Thanks.

Thank you, Councillor Bligh.

Thank you, and thank you, Councillor Zhou, for articulating all that is important about what...

our health care system and hospitals do locally. And I think this is an exciting time for our city, of course, with St. Paul's and then with the VGH precinct sort of revitalization, if you will, for the future. So happy to be supporting. I'll just be very brief. We have a lot on in the next day and a bit. But really, I just want to highlight the opportunity I feel like we have to connect through this redevelopment plan. And so I think I've made that pretty clear so far. And it's because of what's south of this massive block and then, of course, what's north of it is just a major transit corridor. And so it's both what's happening in the hospital, but also how the surrounding communities relate to it. And I really see that as an opportunity to have a really robust, well-planned, cohesive sort of urban center hospital that really drives walkability and safety, as well as, of course, the existing active transportation law. West 10th. There are parts of our city that I think are incredibly walkable because somebody thought of something at some point, whether it's a little walkway in between two buildings. Human nature is we're looking for the shortest path to get somewhere and people are more likely. to access mainly active transportation over their vehicles if they perceive they can get there faster by walking. And I think that's what the high speed subway line does on Broadway and why it's such a unique benefit to the hospital. So whether it's people who are accessing the hospital for work or visiting people or their own healthcare appointments, as well as how the surrounding residents view the hospital as a link to the rest of the city, not something they have to sort of get around. And so if we're talking about big picture planning on this site, that's what I'm quite excited about. I will say it's regrettable that we have to deal with the building that's designated as heritage. And I can appreciate the cost and the seismic and all the pieces that have made that building, unfortunately, something that... needs to be considered. But I just want to recognize the speaker who did come to speak and holds up the value of heritage across our city. I do think that that is incredibly important. And, you know, if there are ways to preserve that in whatever form that looks like, I suspect everybody will be working together to make sure that that happens. But it is regrettable, but I will support everything that's sort of come forward today as well as, of course, the amendment that was moved and look forward to a future clearer vision in 2027 in terms of what that looks like.

Thank you.

Thank you. Councillor Frye. Yeah, thanks. Also happy to support the report and the policy update. VGH may be named for our city, but really, and it seems like it's our backyard, but really this is an important institution for the entire province. And I think this ensures that it will continue to be, and it will be the hospital of the future and for the future. And, you know, I spent a fair amount of time at VGH as a patient, as a supportive friend and family member during some dark times, but also as a really bored kid when my families who were... called to work but stuck for a sitter would drag me to VGH and have to wait around. And what struck me from our recent visit in behind the scenes and under in the tunnels was how little some of the aspects had really changed and how aged the facilities were and recognizing that that really does require that big picture long-term framework to renew the facilities, to expand the facilities, to modernize the facilities, and making all of that happening of course, while you're maintaining a continuity of care for patients who are so reliant on the services at FGH.

I'm also disappointed that we didn't see an opportunity to integrate the original Heather Pavilion, but I recognize that these are... challenging uh constructs within a pretty confined space i also would have liked to see more purposeful integration with the new transit infrastructure this new transit spine that we're going to be putting in along broadway and and recognizing those great channel challenges we talked about just getting from broadway subway up the hill but i'm confident that those will probably come at some point and um And I'm also hoping that this project will actually catalyze more work towards a Broadway cycling path because I think we are seeing where the challenges with West 10th may be more apparent. And indeed, some of the challenges with West 10th as we go east are also pretty challenging. And I think this all calls for more decisive action on delivering. significant cycling infrastructure along Broadway, especially as we see the emergence of the subway will reduce traffic.

But on the whole, I'm very supportive of this, and I really appreciate that we are making this move forward and those critical investments in health care infrastructure that we need. And I'm very hopeful for the future of EGH. And I really thank everybody for the work going into this.

Documents