VanStat Roads and Sidewalks Capital Funding
Motion 9 · Council Meeting, February 24, 2026
Summary
- Proposed directing staff to include approximately $104 million in the 2027–2031 capital plan for arterial road, local road, and sidewalk renewal, representing a major increase from the $34 million allocated in the current capital plan.
- Staff presentation showed city arterials are funded at roughly $3–5 million per year, enough to repave about 1% of the network annually; local roads receive about $2.5 million per year; sidewalks receive about $1 million per year against a $500 million repair backlog.
- Without increased investment, pavement condition index scores for city-managed roads are projected to continue declining.
- Councillors supporting the motion cited safety risks, legal liability from trip and fall claims, and the principle of returning to basic infrastructure funding.
- Councillor Rebecca Bligh asked that any report back clearly identify where the $104 million would come from and what other capital projects it would displace, and called for stronger pursuit of federal and provincial infrastructure funding.
- Councillor Maloney expressed concern the motion was focused on motor vehicle infrastructure and did not adequately address active transportation or accessibility needs.
Vote
Public comments
Read all 4 statements
Transcript
53 segments
Could I have a two-minute recess to draft a minor modification and amendment to the amendment, please? Otherwise, I could go after Councillor Dominato.
If you can go after Councillor Dominato, because I'm sure Councillor Dominato will have more than two minutes. Councillor Dominato.
Thank you. Given the run amendment, through you, a point of information to staff. I actually was wanting to ask a couple of questions around the presentation this morning, and particularly a couple of my questions were asked, a number of them were asked by my colleagues, but I'm interested in the context of what you delivered as a presentation around the road network and sidewalks. If you could speak to the issue of liability and legal liability around risks around tripping, hazards on sidewalks, cyclists hitting cracks or holes in potholes and streets. Could you comment on that and what we see typically annually in terms of liability concerns?
I don't know if we have anyone from legal here for that or if Lon wants to talk. I'll turn over to you.
I have a partial answer, and then maybe Lon can fill in some of the blanks. So we have a trip hazard program specifically for sidewalks, and part of the reason for that is to ensure that we will provide safe sidewalks for all of the folks who use them, but also to ensure that we're meeting our legal obligations as it comes to care and maintenance and the management of trip hazard. In that program, you know, we walk every single sidewalk every single year and we, you know, use our program of asphalt filleting to ensure that we don't have trip hazards to the degree that we can manage them reasonably. And that's typically what we point to when there is a trip and fall claim as the city's sort of due diligence. So similarly for road and sidewalk network or the road networks overall, I think the test is really are we doing everything that we reasonably can to manage our roads and like whether they're a local road or an arterial road. But maybe Lon has more to say about that.
I appreciate that. So what I'm hearing is the importance of the work is to mitigate and prevent ultimately claims. But would it be fair to say that the city has had claims? And so that may be, again, it reinforces the importance of, I don't want to put words in your mouth, so I'm just asking if you can comment on that.
It would be fair to say that we get claims, yes.
Okay. I'll stop there because this is my time for commenting and debate as well. So thank you.
Yeah, just wanted to say strongly in support of this amendment. In the presentation, we saw that with the predicted PCI and the current budgets that we have, that the average condition of our roads, particularly the arterial and local road network, would continue to decline. So I'm looking at the chart right now that we just saw a few minutes ago. It's quite a substantial decline. And as we all know, Vancouverites rely on safe sidewalks and roads that are in a good state of repair. and we heard that TransLink has increased their funding for the major road network, and I really believe that it's time that the city does the same. When I heard that we only have been allocating something like $2 million, I can't remember if that was for local roads or sidewalks, that was just kind of stunned by that low number, and I think this is a worthwhile investment, and it's long overdue, so I'm in strong support of this amendment from the mayor. Thanks. Thank you very much. Councillor Kirby Young.
Yeah, thanks. I was also on the queue to ask some questions, so I'm going to try to be quick then with the time. Can I question through you, Chair, to staff if I can, and try to fire these quickly because I also want to make comments. With respects to the Translake major road network funding that went from $6 to $16 million, do we also have cause for concern about risk to that with the recent provincial budget as well as the federal budget for any capital? projects. I know TransLink has tried to retain that because they know it's very valued by local municipalities the last few years, but they are also facing pretty significant financial pressures, so we should also be concerned about that funding, should we not?
My understanding is that for 2026 and 2027, the funding has been included as part of their financial plan, but that moving forward, I think it's sort of yet to be approved. And so there is some risk to funding at that level beyond those years.
And it does have to be reapproved annually, and that was in advance of the provincial budget. They did not see the support that they had hoped for. Is that correct?
I don't believe it's approved annually. Is it?
I believe it is.
But periodically, yeah, as part of the overall plan.
Okay. I'm pretty sure it's annual, having attended Mayor's Council for Mayor Sim. My other question was just around the cost for curb cuts and gutters are very expensive. Why is that, you mentioned?
In order to add curb and gutter to a road, like an unimproved road, you typically would have to excavate a significant amount of the roadway itself in order to kind of like refit the road. And so there's the cost of like the subsurface preparation and then the concrete work itself. And so concrete work is just generally expensive.
Okay. Thanks. I appreciate that. And then speaking to the amendment on the floor, I will say that it's sobering when you look at the stats with 40% of our road network in extremely poor or very poor condition. It's concerning. We hear about it all the time. It has a safety impact, obviously. It has legal liability. perspective, which Councillor Domonato pointed out and I was going to ask about that as well. But it also, I think, makes residents feel like the city is deteriorating. I think that this is a, quite frankly, this budget has been starved over the past couple of capital plans. And I think that this is reflective of a bigger trend of our aging infrastructure and the fact that the city of Vancouver has spent funding on a number of other priorities, filling gaps that were outside our jurisdiction and, quite frankly, our own suffered. And this is, I think, really about acknowledging that and riding the ship. When you leave them over time, they decay faster. They cost more to fix. And it's shocking, actually, when you look at the fact that 40% in a city like Vancouver's is in poor condition. And we would be in far worse shape if we didn't have the TransLink funding for the major road network. So this is pretty pivotal in terms of the fundamental basic things that we are required to do before we even get to the things that add to quality of life and fun in Vancouver, which also where we have gaps, and I think we need to address whether it's the infrastructure, community centers, and so forth. So I don't think that there should be a debate around this. I think that this is necessary. It's at sort of a significant crisis level, and I think council does need to take action on it. So I'm very happy to second and support the proposed direction. Thank you.
Yeah, thanks. I was waiting. I thought there was an amendment coming, but maybe it's not. I'll just comment if it isn't. I'm going to make my comments now on the motion as presented. I would concur with my colleagues that this is, given the information we've received today, while we do have some roads and we have sidewalks that are in good condition on Balancers, others that are not. And I would say... As we're looking to prioritize capital infrastructure in the city, while this isn't really sexy, and I appreciate the presentation that made it way more interesting this morning, it is pretty fundamental. And I consistently hear from residents about concerns about safety and accessibility of our sidewalks. And I consistently hear from cyclists about the conditions of the road and concerns of falls and safety concerns there as well. And so while this isn't exciting like opening a new community center or facilities like that, it is the real basics that we need to provide for and manage and really is in the direct purview of the city. But I really think if you step it back, it's not about asphalt. It's not about concrete. It's not about materials. It's not about roadways. It's really about ensuring that residents, whether they're walking, they're in a mobility device, they're driving, they're cycling, that they're safe. And also it's preventative as well, this effort. So happy to support the motion.
Thanks very much. I just have a point of information through you, Chair, to the staff. And I'm looking at the further that my question is, as part of the report back, would that include also a work plan in terms of our capacity to deliver? Because, you know, I think from a staffing perspective, you know, we've often... invested in capital infrastructure, but not necessarily had the complement of staff required in order to meet that accelerated demand. And I think of curb cuts and things like that, where we've actually, as a council, sort of wrestled with hiring external contractors to do that work. Would that be part of the report back?
Yeah. Yeah, happy to include that as part of the report back. I think it's really important that we are able to deliver on the funding that's available. And so we would, you know, leverage all of our tools, internal crews, external contracting. And yeah, that's a reasonable thing to include. We'd be happy to do that.
Great. And then further to that, would it also include where that money's coming from? Meaning... if it's dollars that would be otherwise allocated to a community center upgrade or upgrading the Vancouver Aquatic Center or a kid's pool or something like that, that we can clearly identify where that funding is coming from because $70 million is not something I think we have sitting on the sidelines waiting to be allocated.
Good morning, Mayor, Council, Sandra Singh, Deputy City Manager. The way we interpret this motion is this is a direction, if passed, this would be a direction from Council to include this amount in the draft capital plan. That plan will include trade-offs across a wide variety of city services, and we'll bring that to Council for consideration, and it will ultimately be your decision how to allocate it across the many city assets.
Yeah, this is not my first capital plan, so I just want to clarify that in the report back that it'll be very clear where this particular motions funding is coming from versus general trade-offs.
In the capital plan, our finance colleagues typically do indicate what the funding source is for the variety of assets, whether it's DCLs or CACs or tax-funded or government contributions.
I understand all that. So what I'm looking for is that a reallocation from what was planned to what would be delivered through this amendment. Because this is a specific ask. I think we're on the same page with where that's coming from. That'll be a question that comes up in the future. And then I just had a question around staff's interpretation of... Well, actually, I'll leave that just for my closing comments, which I'll just make now, which is to say I'm happy to support this. I think that we have underfunded what's required in terms of capital infrastructure, renewal and upgrades in terms of meeting the demand. But we've done that across the board. and focused on when I think about our next capital plan funding is how we can leverage the work we're doing intergovernmentally with other levels of government to make sure that we are maximizing our ability to access infrastructure funding that was allocated actually in the federal budget. $51 billion. And I just feel like we haven't been clear enough about what funding are we going after? What are we getting? What are we not getting? And particularly around the $17 billion that is matching funds with the province. I mean, so much of what we have to upgrade and balance in terms of development is around TODs and TOAs, which is provincially sort of, you know, provincial expectations, if you will, on a city to build more housing. And that costs us in terms of being able to pay for the roads and the sewers and all the things we need to deliver on that housing. I just hope that we push a little harder to be able to show our work and show where we're able to connect the dots with funding that we can get from the province, funding that we can get from the federal government, so that this isn't just taking away from other... underfunded projects that need infrastructure. And I just don't see us doing enough to get that funding in our city. We're a big city. We're on the map with the federal government. We need to be able to push that forward and make a case to get investment in our city. So that's what I'll be looking for. I'm supporting this with the caveat that we need to be able to show our work in terms of going outside of Vancouver taxpayers to fund these projects.
Thanks. Yeah, I appreciate any extra funding that goes to this cause and so I'm very supportive. I just wanted to, there were some questions that I was going to explore. One of the concerns that I have is that we've got city policies that prioritise, there's a hierarchy of transport modes that are prioritised in a particular order for a particular reason. This is a very motor vehicle traffic-focused motion, and while that is very important, we also... What I want to do is make sure that we find out what funding is required to do things like ensure the maintenance of the active transport network, the replacement of curb cuts, some of which... aren't best practice. They point wheelchair users out into the centre of the intersection instead of directly across to the opposite sidewalk curb cut. There are some... In terms of the actual dollar funding that's in the amendment... That is focused on the motor vehicle traffic rather than what I want to make sure that we're considering how much money is needed to make sure that we maximise accessibility and giving a more equitable funding allocation to transit, active transport. walking, those are things that we actually prioritize in existing city policy. So I would very much welcome this amendment to the amendment being seconded and supported.
Thank you.
Okay. I'm going to move to the amendment queue here, just as a matter of procedure.
I was hoping that that time I just spent would be on the amendment queue, actually, if it could be transferred, because I do have a whole bunch of questions that I...
Awesome. Councillor Zhou? Yeah, I just want to quickly ask... Do you have a seconder? Great. Councillor Orr, thank you. Councillor Zhou?
Yeah, thanks. Just want to ask a point of information through you, Chair, to the staff.
So just wondering, the transit route, that's funded by the TransLink, right? Not by the city?
It's a combination. So it's the major road network where there are some very significant transit activities that's funded by TransLink, but there are a number of bus routes and transit routes in the city that are on the city arterials that are funded by the city.
Okay, thanks. That's all my question.
Yeah, I'm supportive of the Mayor's amendment, and I think this actually amendment to the amendment from Councillor Maloney supports a lot of the unstated goals in our transportation planning and active transportation and accessibility and equity, so I think that this is also an important amendment to that amendment, and I'm happy to support it. Thank you very much.
If you could please go to the voting panel.
And the amendment fails with myself, Councillors Kirby Young, Don Minato, Montague, Klaassen, Meisner, and Joe in opposition. Okay, so we'll go back to the main queue. Councillor Maloney.
Thank you. This is a question, I think, for the director of, I'm sorry, the head of engineering. Could you just explain, so painting of car roads is budgeted, but painting of cycling and pedestrians?
infrastructure is only when requested. Could you just explain what the situation is there?
In terms of road markings, we do annual lane markings. Those include whether it's a painted bike lane or a painted delineation between lanes. Those are done annually. When we look at road markings, which might be the thermoplast, you know, for a bike stencil or something like that, that's something that we would do on request. Generally, they have a longer lifespan, so these would be thermoplastic crosswalks and things like that. Those are on request.
And how much extra would it cost to include automatic renewal of those markings instead of having them on request?
We did provide a memo to council last year specific to that question. So we can reissue that memo. It does tell you exactly what would be required for a regular maintenance program for all road markings.
And also, is there any work being done to influence the navigation apps to prevent rat running on streets that are more prone to damage?
We have been working quite well. We try. I mean, we don't have control over Google Maps and things like that. It's actually been an issue more recently with the amount of construction disruption that we've been experiencing in the last little while, in particular with the closure of Broadway. So we've seen people being rooted onto streets like local streets and lanes and creating a lot more traffic there. And so we have our own measures that we can bring in, like a left turn ban or a closure, a temporary closure, which we'll undo when the construction work is complete. But we've also been reaching out to those map apps to try to get them to not use lanes and things like that with some success.
Do you know which level of government would have the ability to regulate those kind of apps to require it?
I don't know, quite honestly. I mean, with the map providers that are through apps, the best we can do is have that conversation. And as soon as we bring in a measure which results in a closure, their app updates automatically because it often is very responsive to where vehicles already are.
Thank you very much. Okay. Seeing no one else in the queue, I'm going to call the motion to vote. to the voting panel great and that passes unanimously and that completes presentation number one thank you everyone thank you for your hard work So we're going to go on to the reports now. The first report we have is number one, 2STGD plus safety and inclusion action renewal. Before we begin this agenda item, if anyone believes that they have a conflict of interest, now is the time to declare it. Seeing no one declaring, this item does have a presentation and we do have our team members to present this item.
Statement Watch
Thank you. Mayor and Council, my name is Eric Mattel. I am the Director of Streets and Engineering Services. And today I'm here to talk with you about the condition of our roads and sidewalks. So for each of roads and sidewalks, we'll start with our assets and their condition. We'll talk about trends and projections. And we'll also talk about the challenges that kind of face each of those parts of the network. We'll talk about how we choose our projects and examples of some of the coordinated projects we've completed recently. So we'll start with roads. So from an asset management perspective, we classify our roads into three categories. The first is the major road network. So these are roads of regional significance. They are high-volume, multi-lane roads. They serve as major transit corridors or truck routes, so streets like Granville or Broadway or Hastings. And these are, in fact, the maintenance and rehab are funded entirely from TransLink. There's 121 kilometers of major road network in the city of Vancouver. The next category is our own arterial network. So along with the major road network, the arterials form the backbone of the transportation network. So also high volume, multi-lane, and there's 239 kilometers of arterial road in the city. The last category are the local roads. So there's nearly 1,100 kilometers of local road in the city. This category is a little more varied because there are, you know, the quiet residential street that you might think of when you think of a local road, but also in this category are higher priority local roads, local street bikeways, access to hospitals, routes to school, along with industrial roads and some commercial streets as well. So how do we assess the condition of these pavements and these roads? So every three to four years, we conduct a citywide survey of every street in the city. We do this following best practice. So we use vehicles that are equipped with sophisticated instrumentation. And we measure pavement distress, smoothness, strength. And from all of that data that we collect, we assign a score to every single block in the city. This score is a 0 to 100 score. It's called pavement condition index. And along with that, we also build a model of the roads in the city. And so with that model, we can... determine what are the best investments, what are the highest priority candidates for rehabilitation and repaving. And we also use this data to understand what different investment scenarios, what outcomes we can get from different investments. So this graph here is a theoretical plot of pavement condition and degradation over time. So on the vertical axis you have pavement condition and on the horizontal axis you have time.
And so over the course, like the life of a road, it would start in very good condition and it would deteriorate over time. And really what this is showing is that the most cost effective way to maintain a road is to actually keep it in sort of good and very good condition and to, you know, utilize the lower cost interventions like crack sealing and thin overlays. But that allowing a road to deteriorate further into poor and very poor condition, this becomes a much more expensive thing to repair, requires more extensive reconstruction. And it's also in this zone of sort of fair and poor roads where we have to do reactive pothole patching. So we get a number of requests from council and the public inquiring about the condition of our roads and potholes and sort of this is the overall condition of the road and why we have to do so much of that. So to give you a sense of what we talk about when we say very good and fair and very poor, these are examples. So on the left, you have a block of East Hastings that we paved last year. So this is a road in very good condition. On the right of this slide, you'll see West 10th Avenue. So this is a street that's in very poor condition. You can see the cracking and all of the surface defects. We will pave this road later this year. And in the middle, there is a block of commercial street that is in fair condition. You can start to see some of the cracking sort of longitudinally along the roadway. So when we complete our pavement condition surveys, we can tell the overall condition across the city. And so what this map kind of tells you, and I can appreciate that there's a lot on it, is that condition really varies across the city. The major road networks of those roads that are maintained or funded by TransLink are generally in very good condition, with the exception of Broadway, which because of subway construction, we'll come back and repave that shortly after that's completed. Our own city arterials, though, about half of them are in poor and very poor condition, and the local roads are kind of a mix of poor and good and fair conditions. The budgets that we have to work with, for the major road network, we have about $5 to $6 million, or until recently we did. TransLink has recently made a significant increase to their annual funding for the major road network rehab. For the arterial roads, we have about $3 to $4 million, $3 to $5 million annually, and that funding has stayed pretty flat over the last few capital plans. Similarly for local roads, we have $2 to $3 million. Again, that funding has been flat over the last number of capital plans. And so what that means is that for the city arterials, we can repave about 1% of the network, which would be okay if a road lasted for about 100 years, but it does not. And for local roads, it's really only a very small proportion of local roads that we can repave. And in fact, a lot of that is really just to deal with kind of emergency spot repairs that come up.
So this is a long-term trend. So this is a combination of measured data. So there's the red dashed line at 2023. To the left of that line, those are data points that we've collected through our survey. And to the right is what our pavement model tells us will happen at current investment levels. So the top line is actually TransLink's major road network. So TransLink sets a condition target of 75 PCI, and they fund to that condition. And so until recently, the average condition of the major road network in the city has been above 75 PCI, and it was only with the last survey did we see that dip. And that dip actually happened regionally, so not just in the city of Vancouver. And TransLink has responded to this data. And so their annual contribution to maintain our roads has been historically about $6 million a year. And they've increased that to $16 million a year moving forward. And so we're confident that the condition of the major road network will recover. So that's shown by the upward arrow. And that it will, you know, at least hit 75 PCI moving forward. If the city continues its trend of sort of flat funding in terms of absolute dollars for our own arterial network and the local roads, the expectation is that those roads will continue to deteriorate. And so you can kind of see where the trend line is taking us. Yeah, maybe I'll leave it there. And so to provide a bit more context, so this is a graph that shows the arterial road network. So the red line is the projected condition over time at current funding. And we added the green line, which would show the level of investment that would be required to sort of hold the average condition of the network flat. And so what that would mean is that some roads would deteriorate, others would be renewed, but that the average condition of the network would be stable. And so that would be an increase from about $5 million a year for arterial renewal to about $8 or $9 million a year. Similarly for the local roads, our annual budget is about $2.5 million a year, and it would take about $10 million a year to hold the average condition of the network stable. So what causes the deterioration of our roadways? I'm going to run through six kind of topics here. So these are the major drivers for roadway degradation. So we have heavy vehicles, specialty materials, peat areas, utility cuts, unimproved streets, and winter weather. So the first one is heavy vehicles, so trucks and buses. This is the primary reason why roads deteriorate, particularly our arterial network. You just can't build a road that's going to withstand the wear and tear of these heavy vehicles, particularly starting and stopping or on heavy truck routes. And so the image on the right, this is a section of 49th Avenue where you can kind of see the effect of a bus stop where a heavy vehicle is starting and stopping repeatedly in the same location.
Specialty materials are a challenge for us. They are expensive to procure, they're expensive to install and maintain, and they require specialty skill sets and equipment. peat areas. So peat is like a highly compressible organic soil or subsurface condition that exists in different parts of our city. And so in these areas, what you'll see is that the road is very typically in poor condition. Sidewalks are often sort of undulating and even sort of fences and houses are sometimes askew because there really just is no solid ground to build on in peat areas. And just for context, this is a map of the peat areas across the city that we're aware of. And so it's a problem that exists in a number of different neighborhoods and is, from a maintenance and renewal perspective, quite challenging. utility cuts for development or other kind of third-party utility work. We collect fees when folks cut our roads, and they have to do that in order to service development and renew utilities. But whenever you cut a road, you introduce a new seam in a road, a new point of failure. And even those fees that we collect, they can't fully restore the road to its prior condition. So this is kind of an ongoing battle for us. Unimproved streets. So when we say unimproved streets, we're talking about streets without curb and gutter. And so a street without curb and gutter... The curb and gutter serves a number of different purposes for drainage and other things, but it also holds the pavement structure together. And so when you don't have curb and gutter, you get separation of the asphalt much more easily, cracking in the roadway. And on streets like this, you also have typically gravel shoulders where parked vehicles are going to sort of mount and dismount the roadway. And so you get a lot more cracking and damage, which tends to allow more water in. So roads without curb and gutter tend to not last nearly as long as roads that are built with concrete curb and gutter. And finally, winter weather. So, you know, particularly in our city where the roads are, you know, typically not in great condition, there's already entry points for water through cracking and other defects in the roadway. And the freeze-thaw cycle of water where water is expanding and contracting over and over causes damage both to the surface and below the surface, particularly in our climate where, you know, our winters tend to hover around zero degrees. And so we get number of those cycles kind of over and over. So that's a big problem for road condition. Moving on to sidewalks. So we have about 2,200 kilometers of sidewalk in the city of Vancouver. We conducted our first detailed sidewalk condition survey in 2021.
So this was inspectors going out and measuring every defect, every tree heave, every crack. And so we now have very, very good data for the sidewalk network overall. In addition to that, we have inspectors who walk every sidewalk every year looking for trip hazards. And this is where you'll see crews come and install asphalt fillets to ensure that there are smooth transitions from panel to panel. This also protects us from lawsuits and other things. So kind of unlike the roads, the sidewalk condition overall looks pretty good. About 10% of our sidewalks are in poor and very poor condition, but we have a lot of sidewalks. And so when you have a lot of something, even 10% represents a big backlog of repair that we have to get to. And so we have about $500 million of backlog in terms of sidewalk outstanding repairs. So if we were to try to fix everything, that's what we think it would take to do that. Our annual funding for sidewalks, though, is about a million dollars and has been for a number of years. And so we're able to kind of do very little with this money. And in fact, you know, this represents about a 400-year backlog in terms of sidewalk repair overall. And so in practice, our sidewalk repair budget is largely used for emergency spot repairs, things like that. And so kind of similar to roads, we have specific challenges with sidewalks. And, you know, along with peat and utility cuts and specialty materials, the primary issue that we deal with the sidewalks is tree heaves. And so, you know, over the course of time, our city developed, we planted lots of large trees adjacent to sidewalks. And those trees and root systems are now like lifting panels and creating mobility challenges for folks across the city. We continue to plant trees, but we do it in a much smarter way. We use larger soil volumes. We have correct offsets. We choose better species. And so we don't expect this problem to reoccur with the new infrastructure that we build, but we have many hundreds of thousands of trees that we have to manage adjacent to our sidewalks. So how do we choose our projects? So we have a huge need for repair, and we have limited budget to work with. And so how do we choose? We base our determinations, obviously, on asset condition and on the outputs of our payment model, as one example that I talked about earlier. We look for projects that serve as many users as possible. We assemble the data that we get through service requests, and we input that into our decision-making process. We look for high return on investment projects. And so what this often means is partnering with others who are doing work in the roadway.
So that might be transportation, it might be parks, utilities, whether they're internal or external, coordinating with development or working with our partners like TransLink. And we also have large internal construction crews. And so this is a unique benefit that we have that other municipalities in our region don't. And we also have our own asphalt plant. And so what this allows us to do is deliver asphalt and concrete work very affordably, relatively speaking, and manage the quality and the timing and the control over all of our projects. When it comes to sidewalk, we look at a number of things to figure out where we would want to try to invest in sidewalks. And so separate from the full sort of $500 million backlog, if we look at where we see high pedestrian volumes, where are routes to transit, where are routes to school, where are routes to other amenities, we've mapped those things and have developed a way of choosing or prioritizing sidewalk investments where we can. And then so finally here, I'll just run through a few examples of what these coordinated projects sort of look like. So this one here is West King Edward. So this was completed last year. So rather than just a pure utility project where we're replacing sewers and water and having a large cut in the road, we're also repaving the road. We're making transportation improvements. We're introducing green infrastructure. And so in doing that, we're able to deliver much more value with a single mobilization and, you know, a single traffic impacts and other of the usual sort of like construction overheads. And so we're able to get more value in this way. This is an example downtown where after a number of utility cuts had taken place, rather than repairing cut by cut, we're rebuilding the entire intersection and also taking the opportunity to make other enhancements to the intersection from a design perspective. Here's an example. This is the sidewalk on Howe Street near Canada Place. So, you know, we had heard from our partners, and we understand that this is a very important place. You know, it's a welcome mat for visitors and others, and the overall condition of the sidewalk here is very poor, and so we prioritized this as one of our kind of few large-scale sidewalk rehab projects recently. This is an example of a bus route conversion downtown. So, you know, when we do get new bus routes in the city, that is very exciting, but it also introduces new challenges for us. Again, the weight of those vehicles, particularly on roads that are not designed for them, can be, you know, it just introduces a new... maintenance obligation for us over time and so when we can we upgrade the road to you know ensure that those changes in the network have a minimal impact overall and so this is an example where we've rebuilt the pavement structure and introduced other infrastructure at bus stops to to help with that and that was my last slide
Statement Watch
Yeah, Lon LeClaire, General Manager of Engineering Services. With our streets crews, they don't see the differentiation that transportation does. So in transportation, we have kind of a further classification, which would include collector. But for the purposes of our streets maintenance, this is... a street that carries heavy vehicles like trucks and buses. And so for that reason, we treat it as arterial in the world of road maintenance.
Statement Watch
It'd be like a rough estimate. Good morning, Ross McFarland, Streets Capital Program Manager. So on the topic of bus pads, TransLink does provide some cost share funding for kind of installing new bus pads as bespoke projects, but also in the course of us doing our larger arterial or MRN paving projects, we also look for opportunities where we can install those bus pads at the same time.
Okay, and do you have an idea of what they cost? Are they super expensive or... It's okay.
I'd have to go back and check with our PM team of some of the recent costs for the ones we've been installing.
Statement Watch
Good morning, Mayor, Council, Sandra Singh, Deputy City Manager. The way we interpret this motion is this is a direction, if passed, this would be a direction from Council to include this amount in the draft capital plan. That plan will include trade-offs across a wide variety of city services, and we'll bring that to Council for consideration, and it will ultimately be your decision how to allocate it across the many city assets.
Yeah, this is not my first capital plan, so I just want to clarify that in the report back that it'll be very clear where this particular motions funding is coming from versus general trade-offs.
In the capital plan, our finance colleagues typically do indicate what the funding source is for the variety of assets, whether it's DCLs or CACs or tax-funded or government contributions.