Peanut Gallery Vancouver City Council
| | Est. 12,026 HE | |

Amendment – Below-Market Rental 1405 Main Street

Motion 7 · Public Hearing, February 3, 2026

Defeated Location 1405 Main Street and 1510 Quebec Street Moved by Pete Fry, Sean Orr Watch recording

Summary

  • Proposed requiring 20% below-market rental units within the 1405 Main Street development.
  • Mover argued the city holds public land in trust and should apply the same inclusionary standards it requires of private developers.
  • Applicant indicated affordability requirements would undermine the project's ability to service the financing needed to build at this scale.
  • Majority opposed on the basis that below-market units would reduce revenue available for broader city priorities and could jeopardize project viability.
  • Councillor Maloney abstained; all ABC and NPA councillors present voted against.

Vote

Transcript

14 segments

Great, thank you very much. Clerk, do we have any other speakers in the chamber? Okay. Okay, so we now will take a two-minute recess for any additional speakers to call in or come forward to the podium.

Thank you.

We have a quorum.

Okay, welcome back, everyone.

We do have an additional speaker, Kyra Young.

Yes.

Hi. Kyra, can I please get you to state whether or not you're a resident of Vancouver for the record?

Yes, I'm a resident of Vancouver, address 6642 Maple Street.

Thank you very much. Please go ahead.

Okay. I've been listening to the meeting online and thankfully I was able to call in because I didn't think I was able to. So I understand that development is necessary and changes do happen. Both would be great if they made sense. This has already been stated by the previous speakers, but the talk of the traffic and the congestion, it really doesn't make sense. McGee's got over 1,400 kids. Maple Grove actually has over 600. There's a potential swing site at the old Maple Grove that they're still discussing filling that with the potential of another 600 kids. The UBC traffic, the Langara traffic, all of that. Additionally, what I wanted to say was, as well as being part of the neighborhood, I also teach at Maple Grove Elementary School. And I've been there as a teacher for over 25 years, and I've seen the changes and the weight that has been put on our school numbers. My children currently go to McGee Secondary and the same thing goes there. Maple Grove is completely full. Like right now, we are absolutely full. We have a wait list. Students who live across the street can't come to our school. Last year, 60 students were displaced and had to be moved to another school until there was space for them to come back to us. And some of them are still not with us. They're still waiting. So adding a large bill potentially bringing in more young families where their children supposed to go. Our brand new school, we're like, I don't know, five years old or something like that. We're happy to get it, but it's smaller. We can't fit what we have in our neighborhood right now. Earlier stated as well, students who are supposed to be so happy to get into this brand new school, they've been pushed out to portables. There are two portables that are sitting in what used to be Maple Grove's old tennis courts. to accommodate this influx of people. There's also currently talk of opening up the remaining two portables because we still don't have the space. So there needs to be better planning. So if this development goes through, as you heard from everybody else, it's just not a good idea. It's not sustainable for our neighborhood. It's not sustainable for the residents. And it's not going to work for our entire community. So I appreciate that you have listened to everybody. I'm hoping that you will really think about it and to think about like the future of our neighborhood. So thank you. And that's all I have to say.

Great. Thank you very much. Okay. Clerk, do we have any speakers in the chamber or online? We do not. Seeing no further speakers, the speakers list is now closed. Clerk, has there been a large volume of public comments received on this item since 5 p.m.?

Clerk 19:03:35

There has not been.

Okay. Seeing that there are few or no public comments received after 5 p.m., I'm now closing the receipt of public comments. Does the applicant have any additional closing comments?

Thank you very much. Do our team members have any closing comments?

Clerk 19:03:59

Staff do not, thank you.

Okay, does council have any final questions for our team members, noting no additional questions to the applicant are permitted? Councillor Domenato.

Thanks, Mayor. And through you to staff, I have a couple of clarifying questions. A number of the residents identified concerns with traffic flow and safety in the context of the proposed development, but also it sounds like regardless of the development in the current context of the school and drop-offs. So could you comment on... What might be, if this were supported, how do we address those concerns? And what does engineering undertake in terms of new developments and looking at traffic flows?

Documents